search results matching tag: blackout
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (61) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (7) | Comments (146) |
Videos (61) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (7) | Comments (146) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Goodbye Stitched Fabric Background and Good Riddance! (Sift Talk Post)
Isn't that Blackout?
Quote hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
OK, everybody ... Freak out! ( in the immortal words of Klaus Meine ... anyone ... anyone?)
Steve, are you with me?
Tags for this video have been changed from 'jet, fighter, blue angels, aerobatics, aircraft, flying, blackout, g force, g lo' to 'jet, fighter, blue angels, aerobatics, aircraft, flying, blackout, g force, g loc' - edited by kulpims
Steve, are you with me?
Tags for this video have been changed from 'jet, fighter, blue angels, aerobatics, aircraft, flying, lessons, blackout, g force' to 'jet, fighter, blue angels, aerobatics, aircraft, flying, blackout, g force, g lo' - edited by kulpims
Steve, are you with me?
Tags for this video have been changed from 'jet, fighter, blue angels, aerobatics, aircraft, flying, lessons, blackout' to 'jet, fighter, blue angels, aerobatics, aircraft, flying, lessons, blackout, g force' - edited by kulpims
Chinese Guy Does Hadouken to Blow Out Candles
Great solace descended on China that one day they had a slow news day. Or a media blackout about something big. One of those two.
Mysterious down vote (Sift Talk Post)
Have you had any other blocks of missing time?
Any blackouts?
Did you ever wake up in a strange town in someone else's clothing?
Sometimes these questions need to be asked.
Camp stove generates electricity for USB charging
>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
Wood fiber has about the same energy density as carbs, so it is essentially cooking a hamburger for your electronics <img class="smiley" src="http://cdn.videosift.com/cdm/emoticon/teeth.gif">
Burning wood isn't exactly "Green" though, so this is a clever marketing angle that is mostly untrue.
Edit, did some googling, and found their electrical output is about 2Watts (not enough to power most light bulbs), and they cost about 130 bucks. Those kind of cost to power ratios are WAAAAAAAAY out of touch of the needs of third world counties, you need kilowatts before you have any real needs met. If you ran this 24/7 for a year, the annual cost of electricity...not including the burning material is 7.42 dollars per KWH. The average cost of electricity in the US is about 10 cents per KWH, marking this as a third world solution is pretty shitty.
Actually, they have a bigger HomeStove as well, and neither it nor the CampStove are really meant to have a primary purpose of generating electricity - the main purpose is to cook things, and the surplus electricity is a nice side effect. According to this page: http://www.biolitestove.com/homestove/homestove-technology/ , the reason this is better than a regular fire or older rocket stove is fewer CO emissions (eco-friendly) and less smoke (health hazard) for cooking the same meals.
In India, there are tons of people with mobile phones, but the power grid is not reliable and there are frequent rolling blackouts. Of course, people could just wait for power to come back to charge their phone, but if you are cooking at the time, why not use the stove?
I think the high price of the CampStove is meant to help lower the price of the HomeStove for these other markets.
America, if you want a candidate with viable plans vote for:
This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by geo321.
America, if you want a candidate with viable plans vote for:
This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by RhesusMonk. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.
America, if you want a candidate with viable plans vote for:
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Blatant-BLACKOUT-of-Ron-Paul-on-CSPAN
Revolution - Trailer
(tosses half-written screenplay about a blackout into the trash)
meh
America, if you want a candidate with viable plans vote for:
Sorry, but I think this is a dupe: http://videosift.com/video/Blatant-BLACKOUT-of-Ron-Paul-on-CSPAN
Although your's is much higher quality
Blatant BLACKOUT of Ron Paul on CSPAN
Conspiracy implies colusion, I think they all just hate him seperately. I don't understand why.
Wiki page here said he caried 2 states.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_presidential_primaries,_2012
Touche, I did infer you thought he's my guy.
The all caps was to emphasize the important part, not to 'yell', people often tend to read the first few words and begin their arguement against a straw man arguement, and I hate replying to them.
He is intelligent, if not smart. He is honest to a fault. Many of his ideas are outrageous at best, but come from an intelligent arguement perhaps taken too far. He will not win, and won't be the retardican nominee, but may force them to ignore the vote to deny him!
And NO, I am not dumbocratic QM, fuck you right back! ;-}
I'm an old school republican (fiscal conservative, social liberal) that's more pissed at the neocons than I ever could be at the democrats. The dumbocrats are useless, but somewhat consistant, the retardicans drank the coolaid and went bat shit crazy on me. What does that leave me with, and don't say 'Tea party', they're a big part of the problem.
>> ^ChaosEngine:
>> ^newtboy:
You didn't hear that he won 2 states because the GOP claimed he didn't and the media repeated it, all before the votes were counted. Apparently audits have shown that he did win.
Ahh, so it's a conspiracy. Fair enough. Unfortunately that's not what you said. You said:
>> ^newtboy: Wikipedia shows him having won 2 primaries,
Please show me where it says that.
>> ^newtboy:
What I'm saying is that apparently Paul is the only one smart enough to play BY THE RULES set up by the retardicans which allow you to win without the most votes...if you think that's underhanded, blame the retardicans that set it up that way so THEY don't have to follow the votes. What I NEVER said is that he's my candidate, you infered that.
Actaully, I didn't. I told you to get over the fact that he lost. I never claimed he was your candidate. You inferred that I inferred that.
>> ^newtboy:
I agree that this WOULD be underhanded and sneaky IF HE DIDN"T TELL EVERYONE PUBLICLY THAT WAS THE PLAN. Saddly for those wanting to denegrate him, he DID repeatedly state this plan, and was ignored.
THANK YOU FOR USING ALL CAPS. I WOULD NEVER HAVE UNDERSTOOD OTHERWISE!!
Publicly stating you plan to ignore the will of the voters does not make it better.
>> ^newtboy:
If you want someone to be mad at, it's the retardicans and the media who ignore this intelligent, honest candidate.
"intelligent, honest candidate"? I don't think so.
Oh, and "retardicans"? What are you, the democrat @quantummushroom?
Blatant BLACKOUT of Ron Paul on CSPAN
>> ^newtboy:
You didn't hear that he won 2 states because the GOP claimed he didn't and the media repeated it, all before the votes were counted. Apparently audits have shown that he did win.
Ahh, so it's a conspiracy. Fair enough. Unfortunately that's not what you said. You said:
>> ^newtboy: Wikipedia shows him having won 2 primaries,
Please show me where it says that.
>> ^newtboy:
What I'm saying is that apparently Paul is the only one smart enough to play BY THE RULES set up by the retardicans which allow you to win without the most votes...if you think that's underhanded, blame the retardicans that set it up that way so THEY don't have to follow the votes. What I NEVER said is that he's my candidate, you infered that.
Actaully, I didn't. I told you to get over the fact that he lost. I never claimed he was your candidate. You inferred that I inferred that.
>> ^newtboy:
I agree that this WOULD be underhanded and sneaky IF HE DIDN"T TELL EVERYONE PUBLICLY THAT WAS THE PLAN. Saddly for those wanting to denegrate him, he DID repeatedly state this plan, and was ignored.
THANK YOU FOR USING ALL CAPS. I WOULD NEVER HAVE UNDERSTOOD OTHERWISE!!
Publicly stating you plan to ignore the will of the voters does not make it better.
>> ^newtboy:
If you want someone to be mad at, it's the retardicans and the media who ignore this intelligent, honest candidate.
"intelligent, honest candidate"? I don't think so.
Oh, and "retardicans"? What are you, the democrat @quantummushroom?
Blatant BLACKOUT of Ron Paul on CSPAN
>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
The Republican party would never allow an unpopular fringe candidate to use bureaucratic loopholes to subvert the will of Republican voters. It would be political suicide. Doesn't this anti-democratic vote-rigging campaign tactic go against his whole "I'm an outsider here to clean up Washington" angle?
...You mean like the GOP and GW did with the entire election...no...the republicans would never do anything underhanded like that. Never!