>> ^Stu:

>> ^Sepacore:
There is no reason a female couldn't achieve the same at teen or pro level. Speed and balance (and timing) is all it takes to be highly competitive.

There's a huge reason. If a female were to play in college or some how make it to the professional level. She may have tons of skill and balance like you say, she might even be the next Barry Sanders, but even he got hit. you put a 140 pound-150 pound girl in at running back, she will get injuries that would end the career as soon as it starts. Quickness is a lot, but men's natural ability to have that extra muscle and padding is why they keep men and women in different leagues.


If we were focusing entirely on brute-force forms of football, I agree. Except I wasn't, I was thinking more in the direction of how she could continue to utilize her honed skills.

I'm not disputing that males have a significant muscle advantage for handing out and taking impacts, but nor was I forgetting there are multiple versions of football, given that I loosely referenced such as a precursor to my point. My statement was an alternative to the 'testosterone wins everything' view.

To clarify, I specifically had Touch Football in mind when stating there would be no reason females couldn't effectively play with men post-puberty.

>> ^Stu:

>> ^Sepacore:
There is no reason a female couldn't achieve the same at teen or pro level. Speed and balance (and timing) is all it takes to be highly competitive.

There's a huge reason. If a female were to play in college or some how make it to the professional level. She may have tons of skill and balance like you say, she might even be the next Barry Sanders, but even he got hit. you put a 140 pound-150 pound girl in at running back, she will get injuries that would end the career as soon as it starts. Quickness is a lot, but men's natural ability to have that extra muscle and padding is why they keep men and women in different leagues.


This pretty much. Just take gender out of it and look at any professional football player that is under 170lbs of mostly muscle (which as has been referenced would be much harder for a woman to accomplish). Then tell me how many of those guys exist and actually play.

It's not just women that would struggle in professional football, it's ANYONE who doesn't have the frame and dedication to produce a highly athletic, robust, and strong physique. There's a reason why 300lb lineman can outrun some of the most fit guys at your local gym. Professional players are pushing the limits of our bodies for any gender!

>> ^Sepacore:

There is no reason a female couldn't achieve the same at teen or pro level. Speed and balance (and timing) is all it takes to be highly competitive.


There's a huge reason. If a female were to play in college or some how make it to the professional level. She may have tons of skill and balance like you say, she might even be the next Barry Sanders, but even he got hit. you put a 140 pound-150 pound girl in at running back, she will get injuries that would end the career as soon as it starts. Quickness is a lot, but men's natural ability to have that extra muscle and padding is why they keep men and women in different leagues.

Nope. The BArrY Levinson!

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1713476/>> ^ant:

>> ^PlayhousePals:
Good thing I hate fish and/or sea food of all kinds =oO

Boo! I love them, but I hate the bones and other hard parts. So no sushis for you!
Hmm, The Michael BAY?

In reply to this comment by Payback:
>> ^Megsta: That's 1 point more than Barry has. Sockpuppet troll much?

Said the Sockpuppet Troll...

>> ^Megsta:

That's 1 point more than Barry has.


Sockpuppet troll much?

>> ^Megsta:

He had his party in control of congress for almost half his first term. What was the excuse then for getting nothing done? At what point do issues become his rather than blaming Bush, or congress, or Joe from accounting? At some point Barry and his administration need to take a little responsibility for getting nothing done, rather than constantly blame everyone else.


What are you talking about nothing done? The rich got saved under Obama, they're getting everything they want, which is his job.

He had his party in control of congress for almost half his first term. What was the excuse then for getting nothing done? At what point do issues become his rather than blaming Bush, or congress, or Joe from accounting? At some point Barry and his administration need to take a little responsibility for getting nothing done, rather than constantly blame everyone else.

That's 1 point more than Barry has.

dont sleep on barry O

HAHA! That's awesome...I was correct on accident I suppose. Or I knew that all along...>> ^Ryjkyj:

>> ^rottenseed:
I don't moderate my channel. The irony is that it's the "law" channel.
[edit] is that irony?

I think in this case, you're dead on:

"Irony deals with opposites; it has nothing to do with coincidence. If two baseball players from the same hometown, on different teams, receive the same uniform number, it is not ironic. It is a coincidence. If Barry Bonds attains lifetime statistics identical to his father’s it will not be ironic. It will be a coincidence. Irony is “a state of affairs that is the reverse of what was to be expected; a result opposite to and in mockery of the appropriate result.” For instance:
If a diabetic, on his way to buy insulin, is killed by a runaway truck, he is the victim of an accident. If the truck was delivering sugar, he is the victim of an oddly poetic coincidence. But if the truck was delivering insulin, ah! Then he is the victim of an irony.
If a Kurd, after surviving bloody battle with Saddam Hussein’s army and a long, difficult escape through the mountains, is crushed and killed by a parachute drop of humanitarian aid, that, my friend, is irony writ large.
Darryl Stingley, the pro football player, was paralyzed after a brutal hit by Jack Tatum. Now Darryl Stingley’s son plays football, and if the son should become paralyzed while playing, it will not be ironic. It will be coincidental. If Darryl Stingley’s son paralyzes someone else, that will be closer to ironic. If he paralyzes Jack Tatum’s son that will be precisely ironic."
- Baba Ram Carlin

>> ^rottenseed:

I don't moderate my channel. The irony is that it's the "law" channel.

[edit] is that irony?


I think in this case, you're dead on:

"Irony deals with opposites; it has nothing to do with coincidence. If two baseball players from the same hometown, on different teams, receive the same uniform number, it is not ironic. It is a coincidence. If Barry Bonds attains lifetime statistics identical to his father’s it will not be ironic. It will be a coincidence. Irony is “a state of affairs that is the reverse of what was to be expected; a result opposite to and in mockery of the appropriate result.” For instance:

If a diabetic, on his way to buy insulin, is killed by a runaway truck, he is the victim of an accident. If the truck was delivering sugar, he is the victim of an oddly poetic coincidence. But if the truck was delivering insulin, ah! Then he is the victim of an irony.
If a Kurd, after surviving bloody battle with Saddam Hussein’s army and a long, difficult escape through the mountains, is crushed and killed by a parachute drop of humanitarian aid, that, my friend, is irony writ large.
Darryl Stingley, the pro football player, was paralyzed after a brutal hit by Jack Tatum. Now Darryl Stingley’s son plays football, and if the son should become paralyzed while playing, it will not be ironic. It will be coincidental. If Darryl Stingley’s son paralyzes someone else, that will be closer to ironic. If he paralyzes Jack Tatum’s son that will be precisely ironic."

- Baba Ram Carlin

Tags for this video have been changed from 'jehovah, witness, masturbation, barry white, amazing, funny' to 'jehovahs witness, masturbation, barry white, amazing, funny' - edited by xxovercastxx

Better than the Barry White version!

First started with the video, noticed there was no Barry, then watched via the link.
In reply to this comment by nomino:
That's funny.

Just out of curiosity, did you click on the link in the description after realizing there was no audio in the embed? Or did you read the description, click the link and got what I intended to deliver via youtubedoubler? I don't want people to miss the compounded effect of having the video with the audio. >> ^hpqp:

I think this is actually a video of JWs jerking the Holy Spirit off.