search results matching tag: bad movies

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.011 seconds

    Videos (36)     Sift Talk (2)     Blogs (5)     Comments (95)   

ant (Member Profile)

Tammy And The T-Rex

Honest Trailers - Hook

ChaosEngine says...

Hook was one of the first movies I ever remember going to and realising “this is a bad movie”. Not in a “this is a boring movie for parents/girls/younger kids than me” sense, but in the sense of “I am exactly who this movie is aimed at.... and it still sucks”

So cheers, Hook. You were the first thing I remember critically assessing. I owe you for that.

You still suck though.

Siskel & Ebert - Pulp Fiction

The Disaster Artist (Official Trailer HD)

The Kick-Ass Movies - Bad Taste - (Best Scenes)

RFlagg (Member Profile)

siftbot says...

Congratulations! Your video, Arrival: A Response To Bad Movies, has reached the #1 spot in the current Top 15 New Videos listing. This is a very difficult thing to accomplish but you managed to pull it off. For your contribution you have been awarded 2 Power Points.

This achievement has earned you your "Golden One" Level 41 Badge!

RFlagg (Member Profile)

Bullets of Justice - Trailer

Bill Murray - You Think You Know Movies?

Bill Murray - You Think You Know Movies?

Everything Wrong With The Avengers In 3 Minutes Or Less

Quadrophonic says...

@Shepppard first of, I think it's a great action movie.
But there are many points in this video i would say are right. For example I didn't see the Cpt. America movie... and why should I? They didn't film a coherent story like Lord of The Rings or Star Wars where it's expected you see the movies in order.
I don't like to be forced to watch for example Cpt. America, just to know what the Tesseract is. It's standalone movie and should be understood without the other movies. In the case of the Avengers it should be enough to know who the Characters are.

In my opinion this is just bad movie making. If you have a film that is based on a book for example, it also shouldn't be necessary to read the book to understand the film. It's nice to have something in the movie only Fans fully understand. But it definitely shouldn't be the main object the story is driven by.
It would be like watching Lord of the Rings, without anyone explaining what the ring does. And after the movie you ask some fan and he says "Yeah you have to read the book to understand that."

P.S.: On a side note, Peter Jackson did not make a good job in explaining what the ring is/does/makes so important but at least he tried.

Bad Trailer

Prometheus Actually Explained (With Real Answers)

EvilDeathBee says...

Christ that video was annoying. 2 try-hard dickheads trying to defend that piece of crap movie and that indecipherable robot voice.
When you have a movie that raises so many questions and answers none of them, relies heavily on external media and lots of tiny hints that is so easily missed to attempt to explain the story, hasn't a single likable or believable character, when it's own DVD release's marketing tagline is "Questions Will Be Answered" just to sell the POS, you simply have a bad movie and no amount of explanation will fix that.

EDIT: I actually believe there could have been a good movie there, and an interesting and mysterious story. However, it was so poorly executed, it's just pretentious wankerey

A Good Day To Die Hard - First trailer

Deano says...

>> ^EvilDeathBee:

Despite Die Hard 4 being a PG13 puss fest, the fact it had the mac guy in it and of course the BS technobabble, it wasn't a bad movie. I look forward to this one


They're doing that with Taken 2. Over here it's a PG-12. One review I read said he basically kills people by pushing them. He pushes a lot of people in the film. Films like that should be 18-rated.



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon