Gotcha...verrrrry interesting...consider my horizons expanded.
In reply to this comment by rottenseed:
it's my shtick to mock when I see people getting chastised by "the man" (usually played by daggy-pie)
In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
...same to you...you also haven't a clue about the situation.

I rather gave you more credit than that. Still so inclined actually.
In reply to this comment by rottenseed:
yea...go **** ****** ******** **** ****** ****** mother's mouth>> ^dag:

Just becaused you starred it out - it doesn't make it OK. We're not 'bots looking for bad words. These kinds of ad hom comments are against the guidelines of the Sift. Please desist.
In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
Awwwww...poor whiny ...don't worry, you'll always be Queenie of the dupes.
In reply to this comment by bareboards2:
http://videosift.com/poll/Would-it-be-helpful-to-have-a-notadupe-in
vocation

it's my shtick to mock when I see people getting chastised by "the man" (usually played by daggy-pie)
In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
...same to you...you also haven't a clue about the situation.

I rather gave you more credit than that. Still so inclined actually.
In reply to this comment by rottenseed:
yea...go **** ****** ******** **** ****** ****** mother's mouth>> ^dag:

Just becaused you starred it out - it doesn't make it OK. We're not 'bots looking for bad words. These kinds of ad hom comments are against the guidelines of the Sift. Please desist.
In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
Awwwww...poor whiny ...don't worry, you'll always be Queenie of the dupes.
In reply to this comment by bareboards2:
http://videosift.com/poll/Would-it-be-helpful-to-have-a-notadupe-in
vocation

Dad, I'm all for the high road.

And I am generally and often appreciative of your acumen, intentions, and perspectives. However, this time, I would prefer you to dissect and analyze this situation. Particularly before you so cavalierly wave your banwand in my general direction.

And to your inference to my ability to exercise self control I am underwhelmed. Your comment had my upvote until then. Perhaps you do not care though.

I am surprised and perplexed at you on this I am sorry to admit. You may not like having to intercede when your "children" or those that you perceive act thus do not play nice. I empathize. I have let things go and reached a capacity and so answered in kind. It might be argued reservedly so and in a manner to communicate my displeasure and that a cessation might be advisable. I am sorry others were drawn into it. I haven't divined the machinations of that yet but will. However, I have addressed each with equanimity.

As to you, I would appreciate more of a even hand rather than a rubber stamp.

In reply to this comment by dag:
Rather than dissect and analyse your comment and mine - or call out other users for similar action, how about you just be nice and perhaps stop commenting to this particular user.

If you don't think this is possible - or you don't understand my intent, perhaps take a break from the Sift - go out and smell the flowers, take some time off. If you're not capable of this, eventually, a break may be enforced. Thanks.


In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
Starred what out Dag? Point of fact, you/she/others may construe or infer to your mind's content or discontent. By design or otherwise, it is rather up to the mind(s) of the reader(s). However, it does indeed seem you are 'bots looking for bad words. Are you going to ban me for *'s. I have seen much worse here, by far. That is neither here nor there. It is your cite after all.

BTW, this unfortunate situation was promulgated by this individual(**********) calling me names and accusing me deleteriously and not just once. Hence my ire and venom. I rather feel like not letting it go as have I before, other cheek and all that.

While not generally given to responding in kind. I unfortunately feel justified if not morally on the high ground.

In reply to this comment by dag:
Just becaused you starred it out - it doesn't make it OK. We're not 'bots looking for bad words. These kinds of ad hom comments are against the guidelines of the Sift. Please desist.

In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
Awwwww...poor whiny *****...don't worry, you'll always be Queenie of the dupes.
In reply to this comment by bareboards2:
http://videosift.com/poll/Would-it-be-helpful-to-have-a-notadupe-invocation

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Rather than dissect and analyse your comment and mine - or call out other users for similar action, how about you just be nice and perhaps stop commenting to this particular user.

If you don't think this is possible - or you don't understand my intent, perhaps take a break from the Sift - go out and smell the flowers, take some time off. If you're not capable of this, eventually, a break may be enforced. Thanks.


In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
Starred what out Dag? Point of fact, you/she/others may construe or infer to your mind's content or discontent. By design or otherwise, it is rather up to the mind(s) of the reader(s). However, it does indeed seem you are 'bots looking for bad words. Are you going to ban me for *'s. I have seen much worse here, by far. That is neither here nor there. It is your cite after all.

BTW, this unfortunate situation was promulgated by this individual(**********) calling me names and accusing me deleteriously and not just once. Hence my ire and venom. I rather feel like not letting it go as have I before, other cheek and all that.

While not generally given to responding in kind. I unfortunately feel justified if not morally on the high ground.

In reply to this comment by dag:
Just becaused you starred it out - it doesn't make it OK. We're not 'bots looking for bad words. These kinds of ad hom comments are against the guidelines of the Sift. Please desist.

In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
Awwwww...poor whiny *****...don't worry, you'll always be Queenie of the dupes.
In reply to this comment by bareboards2:
http://videosift.com/poll/Would-it-be-helpful-to-have-a-notadupe-invocation

Also Dag, does this mean rottenseed receives such a warning as well for his comment on my Profile Page?

PLEASE, sir, first before any such action on your part, might I please intercede? The above was not truly a request for action as I do not feel it necessary. And neither am I insulting your intelligence or perspicaciousness. I merely wish to be clear. He was, perhaps even nobly, giving tit for perceived tat and I understand. He is not aware of the situation either. I think it, if I may humbly offer such, illustrates that things sometimes are more complicated than is seen at first blush.

And, Dag, I am not presuming to dictate when and how you act on your own site. I am asking you to, in my case, to at least ask about the situation. I think that I may have in some small way earned that.

Besides, rottenseed's string of *'s is much more pregnant.... Just saying.
In reply to this comment by dag:
Just becaused you starred it out - it doesn't make it OK. We're not 'bots looking for bad words. These kinds of ad hom comments are against the guidelines of the Sift. Please desist.

In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
Awwwww...poor whiny *****...don't worry, you'll always be Queenie of the dupes.
In reply to this comment by bareboards2:
http://videosift.com/poll/Would-it-be-helpful-to-have-a-notadupe-invocation

Starred what out Dag? Point of fact, you/she/others may construe or infer to your mind's content or discontent. By design or otherwise, it is rather up to the mind(s) of the reader(s). However, it does indeed seem you are 'bots looking for bad words. Are you going to ban me for *'s. I have seen much worse here, by far. That is neither here nor there. It is your cite after all.

BTW, this unfortunate situation was promulgated by this individual(**********) calling me names and accusing me deleteriously and not just once. Hence my ire and venom. I rather feel like not letting it go as have I before, other cheek and all that.

While not generally given to responding in kind. I unfortunately feel justified if not morally on the high ground.

In reply to this comment by dag:
Just becaused you starred it out - it doesn't make it OK. We're not 'bots looking for bad words. These kinds of ad hom comments are against the guidelines of the Sift. Please desist.

In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
Awwwww...poor whiny *****...don't worry, you'll always be Queenie of the dupes.
In reply to this comment by bareboards2:
http://videosift.com/poll/Would-it-be-helpful-to-have-a-notadupe-invocation

...same to you...you also haven't a clue about the situation.

I rather gave you more credit than that. Still so inclined actually.
In reply to this comment by rottenseed:
yea...go **** ****** ******** **** ****** ****** mother's mouth>> ^dag:

Just becaused you starred it out - it doesn't make it OK. We're not 'bots looking for bad words. These kinds of ad hom comments are against the guidelines of the Sift. Please desist.
In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
Awwwww...poor whiny ...don't worry, you'll always be Queenie of the dupes.
In reply to this comment by bareboards2:
http://videosift.com/poll/Would-it-be-helpful-to-have-a-notadupe-in
vocation

yea...go **** ****** ******** **** ****** ****** mother's mouth>> ^dag:

Just becaused you starred it out - it doesn't make it OK. We're not 'bots looking for bad words. These kinds of ad hom comments are against the guidelines of the Sift. Please desist.
In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
Awwwww...poor whiny ...don't worry, you'll always be Queenie of the dupes.
In reply to this comment by bareboards2:
http://videosift.com/poll/Would-it-be-helpful-to-have-a-notadupe-in
vocation

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Just becaused you starred it out - it doesn't make it OK. We're not 'bots looking for bad words. These kinds of ad hom comments are against the guidelines of the Sift. Please desist.

In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
Awwwww...poor whiny *****...don't worry, you'll always be Queenie of the dupes.
In reply to this comment by bareboards2:
http://videosift.com/poll/Would-it-be-helpful-to-have-a-notadupe-invocation

Awwwww. *promote

*dead

awwwww, I wanted to watch again.

I love this movie....

WHERE ARE THE JAZZHAN... awwwww.

Now I get it....

it want to be choggie when it grows up.

choggiejr, idn't it cute, lil bonerless? Awwwww....
>> ^BoneRemake:

I am only as insulting as you make me.
does that make sense ?
I love you overcast, I really really do !

awwwww rotty, you sound soft like me.

to play devil's advocate.... i knew the difference between good music and utter shit when i was her age. and i was aware of the connection between music and the soul. her age is not entirely a good excuse.

however, i basically feel the same way about it as you do.... except c&c music factory should never ever be burned. ... and you should see my marky mark impression.

>> ^chicchorea:

Awwwww...just one more time. >> ^ant:
>> ^chicchorea:
...been trying for almost half a century...better luck to you.

...mwhahahaha...huhhhh, I mean...MWHAHAHAHA
>> ^ant:
>> ^chicchorea:
...see?!
>> ^ant:
Argh, this song is stuck in my head now.


Argh, make it stop!!!!!!!!


It stopped after a few minutes since my last comment about it. I forgot how the song goes and I am not going to play the video to recall it back into my tiny brain.



No way, dude. However, I have Britney Spear's Hit Me One More Time song in my head from your phrase.