This guy has an attitude problem, how about giving the officer some respect? Not talking back and being whiny would have gone a long way.

It's a BS arrest, but I don't think arguing about the arrest while it's happening is going to help in any way.

So all it takes for an 8 year old to jump start himself to smart ass teenager with an attitude problem is a little anesthetic? Sign me up!!!

Dont be angry Enzoblue, JPM floundered a bit last season but its his choice/job/challenge/idea of fun (in most motor racing you need to be in the right team at the right time to win regularly).
The only big thing wrong in nascar+JPM IMHO is a bit of an attitude problem (like in Paybacks comment).

Notice what is said. Culprit first reacts to what he actually saw:
"I saw sparks coming from under the car as if it had a tyre down or something."
Looks like something broke. Likely a wheel/tyre/suspension/pit crew/previous contact problem.
And then he thinks it over and tries to come up with a more popular angle:
"I just wonder if Montoya was going down the back catching up with the field and he didnt know the safety truck was up there and they called him on the radio.."
Look ma he hit the big yellow track dryer on the end of the straight, he must be blind/stupid/distracted and dangerous. LOL

JPMs slightly awkward comment about the truck driver looking scared (not in this video) was funny too.

I was hoping it was going to be this interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpM0wPKBOro

Still an upvote from me though. Idra is my on and off love/hate idol. Its funny because not so long ago he wasn't really viewed as this badass. He was just some Harry Potter lookalike with an attitude problem that lost to every single Korean. Ahh BroodWar I do miss thee so.

Wow, you have an attitude problem... that's for sure. The fact that you've "played covers" means nothing. They sound different, get over it.
>> ^Duckman33:

>> ^schlub:
I didn't say he didn't do a good job or that he didn't do the song justice. I just said he doesn't sound like Freddie. If I'd heard only the audio, I would've known it was NOT Freddie Mercury singing.
>> ^Duckman33:
>> There's nothing wrong with MilkmanDan's ears my friend. Being a singer who has had to cover many different vocal styles myself and has also heard this song as well as most other Queen song many, many times, I listened to the two comparatively and I'm sorry to tell you but he's about as spot on as you can get without being Freddy himself.


So we are all wrong and you are correct. OK you know better than the rest of us, even those of us who actually played covers for a living. I get it.

I dislike the catholic church as an institution, but not catholics..and it isn't to say there are no Christian catholics..but in any case, what's crap is the attitude problem..civil discourse is already at a minimum in society..but its becoming culturally acceptable to be intolerant towards religious beliefs and christians in general because of inanity like this..to just openly mock and deride people for what they believe..this is just another disrespectful egotist lowering the bar by vomiting up hate speech against people who have faith. if this is all the respect an atheist can come up with for his fellow man, it doesn't go very far in convincing me of his so called superior truth..it really just shows the whole ignoble farce for what it is..

Everything I believe is in the bible, there is nothing extra beyond that. I appreciate your warning. I will take it into consideration. It is possible I developed an attitude problem from my interactions here. I tend to respond to the prevailing social dynamic, which in this case is blatant hostility. It's not as if I don't see what's going on, and some things need to be said regardless of perceived appropriateness. However, I will endevour to be more congenial..thank you for your magnanamousness.

>> ^SDGundamX:
@<A rel="nofollow" class=profilelink title="member since January 21st, 2011" href="http://videosift.com/member/shinyblurry">shinyblurry
I've re-read my post. I can find absolutely no condescension in it. I honestly hope you live a better life because of your beliefs and that those beliefs inspire you to help people in meaningful ways.
My theology is Christian, I didn't just come up with it myself.
I have attended all sorts of churches--Catholic, Protestant, Russian Orthodox, Mormon, Armenian, Unitarian and so forth. The theology you have described here is quite clearly different from what those churches preach. Also, did you not claim in a previous post that much of what your understanding of Christianity has come through revelation from God? That would seem to clearly contradict your own statement above.
I have read many of your comments and am genuinely concerned that you don't realize the tone you are taking. You don't seem to be trying to engaging with other people as fellow human beings. Basically, you're talking at them, not to them. I offered you advice in the hope that you could craft your message in a way such that people would actually stop long enough to listen to what you have to say and not miss it entirely because they were too focused on how you phrased it. If it's any consolation, I've given the exact same advice I gave to you to self-proclaimed militant atheists on the Sift who seem to revel in mocking those with religious beliefs, as if their atheism somehow made them better people.
I suspect, though, you have not come here to listen to what other people have to say... you've come here to preach. You are welcome to do so. But you really shouldn't be too surprised if people choose to ignore you. After all, you are for all practical purposes ignoring them as well.
Good luck with the proselytizing (I mean that sincerely, not sarcastically).
Peace.

>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^MaxWilder:
She's got every right to complain.
I agree but I think she's got an attitude problem. She's a judge and this is her courthouse; you're telling me she doesn't have enough pull to have the stairs modified? For $50 plus a few hours labor this whole thing is fixed. Instead she gets CNN on the case. Sounds like she's more interesting in making an ordeal than solving the problem; excellent qualities for a judge, I might add.


She's got an attitude problem? She quotes the pushback she's gotten from talking to whoever is in charge of the building. "That they hope people will be mature? Um, that's not a solution." The attitude problem is from whoever won't spend the few hundred bucks to get the glass frosted.

Also, there is another set of stairs below, so you can't wall it off with plants. The plants would cost more than frosting the glass anyway.

To everybody who says this is a dumb story, I agree. Why isn't the building manager getting it fixed immediately? That may be a better story. Fucking government bureaucracy.

>> ^MaxWilder:

She's got every right to complain.

I agree but I think she's got an attitude problem. She's a judge and this is her courthouse; you're telling me she doesn't have enough pull to have the stairs modified? For $50 plus a few hours labor this whole thing is fixed. Instead she gets CNN on the case. Sounds like she's more interesting in making an ordeal than solving the problem; excellent qualities for a judge, I might add.

>> ^dgandhi:
>> ^shinyblurry:
I really don't know what you're complaining about..sorry that you were forced to watch my video and read all the comments. You do know you don't have to do that, right?

I'm complaining about you being an ass, I already said that a couple of times.
I'm not complaining about you posting a video, and I clearly have not argued that you are "forcing" me or anybody else to have a discussion about it. The point I am making, and that you keep providing more evidence for, is that in comments on and the discussion around this video, you have managed to consistently be a condescending ass.
Your redundant "you don't have to watch it" false apology is a prime example, I have not said you should not have posted it, I have only said that it is nonsense. That I should save myself the displeasure of your video is not what you really mean, you mean that you don't want to hear it. Since you have been lurking here for years you probably picked up on the fact that quality control involves critique, it's just that you are so used to special treatment for your theological views that you didn't consider what you were getting into.
If you want to have a theological discussion, bring it, but do your homework, don't bother with the old tropes like "atheism takes faith" or "only anti-theists are atheists", and certainly don't lead with nonsense that even you must know will be disregarded as the propaganda it is by anybody who does not already agree with you.


You can make a federal case about my supposed attitude problem if you want. Are you aware of the fact that you're on the internet right now? Who on this site doesn't have an attitude problem anyway? Anyhow, since you keep complaining, I'll just say that if I offended you I am sorry. I didn't mean to offend you. If you do want to debate theology, I'm happy to take you up on it.

If I did have a problem with the things I'm hearing here, it's that they're boring and shallow. I've heard them all before, and argued them all before. For and against. I used to be agnostic and like most of you here, had no idea there was a spiritual reality. Like most of you, I considered it nonsense..then I woke up from my ignorance and found out that everything I knew (or thought I knew) was wrong. I don't really expect you to relate to that, since you have no basis of comparison, but I can tell you that there is a lot more going than is apparent to you. Anyhow, most of this is just sniping anyway, trying to provoke a reaction. Problem is, I just don't have an ego to burst about it. Is there anyone here who has actually read any philosophy? Becuase if so, some of you might realize that God is an idea deserving of serious philisophical consideration, a subject debated by some of the greatest minds this world has ever known. Is it *the* question in those circles. It would be laughable if you were to come to a real debate and say "well you don't have any evidence". And you do? Let's get real here..

>> ^kceaton1:I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that you have no idea what "Mormon bible" really means. Since I don't believe in that one or the one with extra action with angels or the one with unicorns or the one with "x^n"... There are A LOT of bibles. Which church is the TRUE church; please enlighten me so I may rip that ONE to shreds. I'm sorry that my "Christianity"™ is not good enough for you.
As to the rest... Go ahead and link every direct observation about the Devil and Hell. It's different in each bible as well. Keep going I can't dig a grave any faster than you are already. BTW, the "Ten Commandments" are old school. So do you follow the New Testament or do you pick and choose what to like when it suites you.
I looked at my religion and others discretely and with observation and found the contradictory fallacies, logical arguments that fail, and the diversity of books, translations, and the number of religions to be enough to stop "divinity" in it's tracks for me.
You've yet to show me any logical reason to follow, somewhere I messed up, or otherwise. You are purely on the defensive. If I may say so, you need to take a hard look at religion is giving you. What would happen if you shut it down, for argument's sake? Would your life, your actions dramatically shift? All I have seen, for now, is by rote memorization quotes or otherwise I learned in seminary or Sunday school. Some of it is different of course, but I guarantee that the majority is the same.
Do you think all people that have chosen to forgo there faith and live a moral life without the fear of an afterlife reprisal all did so because they're Mormon? The only commonality we share is that we chose to question those in authority and piece things together ourselves; as we've been all lied to, which was the best reason to question in the first place.
This will be the last of my responses as I think it is on your shoulders now to logically come to your own conclusion; if you think faith/belief are the only key factors then why preach, as you will never be able to open any eyes with platitudes. If you try to defend again you will only repeat what you've already said.



Whoa there little fella. First of all, you've been asking elementry questions about the nature of God, which presupposes in our discussion that He does in fact exist. All I did was try to answer them. You gave the impression that perhaps you believed in *something*. Which Church is the true church? That would be the Body of Christ my friend. There is no institution which has exclusive rights on Christianity. This is the first fallacy of the Mormon church who has the believe they are the only true church, otherwise their "updates" would be exposed for the fraud they are.

Second, what is this that I don't understand what the Mormon bible means? Isn't that the book of Mormon? What am I not understanding? Jump to conclusions much? The true bible is the one the disciples of Christ wrote, which is the New Testament. There have been many different translations, but essentially they all say pretty much the same thing with the same quotes. The major ones which differ are funnily enough, the Mormon version and the Jehovah Witness version. These cults both started up within the last 200 years and pervert the teachings of Christ to their core. They both deny Christs divinity, with the JWs claiming Jesus was an angel, and the mormons claiming Jesus was the first creature, but not divine. As we know from the bible, anything which denies the divinity of Christ is in the spirit of the antichrist. Meaning, Mormonism by definition is a satanic religion. Worshipping the God of Mormonism is the same as worshipping Satan.

Third, you should really do some real research and gain some understanding before you just go off the cuff. The Old Testament is the original bible, in which is the wisdom of the Lord, and the prophecies which predict the coming of Christ. Christ was a jew. The Old Tesament was His bible, and also the bible of the early disciples. It isn't a matter of picking and choosing. A true Christian believes in both. Christ told us that the ten commandments are still valid, and that he was not there to overthrow the law, but to fulfill it.

Look, I'm sorry you had to grow up Mormon, but I can tell you that your upbringing didn't prepare you for this conversation. You don't seem to know even elementry conceptions about who God is, and what the bible says. For you to just turn your vitriol on me, someone who tried to answer your questions, shows your profound lack of maturity. You're going way out of your way to be as callous and insulting about it as possible. And regards to your purile question, I know what it's like to live without faith. Unlike you, I wasn't indoctrinated; for most of my life I was agnostic. I came to God independently, without religion. From there I followed God to Christianity. If you want to talk about shredding something, I think it should be your bad attitude problem. Good luck and God Bless.

Watching these videos makes me sick. I have to pause and do something else for a while, or I'll get too mad. Fortunately, only that one guy in the first half had the real attitude problem, and the rest were inquisitive without being too arrogant.

But really, at what point will the general public start demanding better police training? A police officer should never have a problem being filmed in public. If they follow procedures, and have a "peace officer" attitude, it can be nothing but good PR. As soon as I see that somebody has a problem being filmed, I immediately know it's because they abuse their authority on a regular basis, and don't trust themselves to behave properly.

So, guy in blue shirt that looks asian and was kind of alluding to him having the possibility of causing problems for them. Was he a bike cop or something?

And the guys in the T shirts at the beginning, did they call themselves marshals? Because black dude obviously had an attitude problem, but other guys in the shirts seemed OK. And dude taking pictures with his cell phone was...trying to turn it around on them? Or sending their pictures off to see if they could bust them with something to get rid of them?

It almost looks like the police were doing them a favor by staying around because the marshals and what not were looking for trouble.

If those guys can't identify themselves, just because they have a specific shirt on doesn't mean they automatically have the authority...and not identifying themselves seems sketchy.