search results matching tag: al franken

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (60)     Sift Talk (2)     Blogs (19)     Comments (175)   

newtboy (Member Profile)

TIM KAINE Questions Betsy Devos For Secretary of Education

TIM KAINE Questions Betsy Devos For Secretary of Education

newtboy says...

The fail is strong with this one. She's shown pretty convincingly why buying cabinet positions should be a felony, just like buying politicians (which she admitted she and her family have done to the tune of $200000000). She is a good test to see if the right will just go along with any insanity Trump decides on or if they plan on doing their job and representing their constituents, because putting this woman in charge of anything is asking for failure.

*related=http://videosift.com/video/Bernie-Sanders-grills-Betsy-DeVos
*related=http://videosift.com/video/Betsy-Devos-Embarrassed-by-Sen-Al-Franken
*related=http://videosift.com/video/Betsy-Devos-thinks-Grizzy-Bears-mean-schools-need-guns
*related=http://videosift.com/video/Senator-Elizabeth-Warren-questions-Betsy-DeVos

Senator Elizabeth Warren questions Betsy DeVos

Senator Elizabeth Warren questions Betsy DeVos

newtboy says...

*related=http://videosift.com/video/Bernie-Sanders-grills-Betsy-DeVos
*related=http://videosift.com/video/Betsy-Devos-Embarrassed-by-Sen-Al-Franken
*related=http://videosift.com/video/Betsy-Devos-thinks-Grizzy-Bears-mean-schools-need-guns

Bernie Sanders grills Betsy DeVos

StukaFox (Member Profile)

siftbot says...

Congratulations! Your comment on Betsy Devos Embarrassed by Sen. Al Franken has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

This achievement has earned you your "Silver Tongue" Level 6 Badge!

Betsy Devos Embarrassed by Sen. Al Franken

Betsy Devos Embarrassed by Sen. Al Franken

newtboy (Member Profile)

Why Bernie Waited to Endorse Hillary: A Closer Look

NetRunner (Member Profile)

Al Franken Discussing 'Violence Against Women Act'

longde says...

No evidence that sharia is becoming accepted in the US. What city/county/state uses it?>> ^lantern53:

Doesn't this fly in the face of sharia, which is becoming more and more accepted in the US? How can we respect other religions and their customs while prosecuting the men who are allowed to rape and beat their wives?
...so confusing...

How PROTECT IP Act Breaks The Internet

xxovercastxx says...

*length=3:51
*fear

Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
Lamar Alexander (R-TN)
Kelly Ayotte (R-NH)
Michael Bennet (D-CO)
Jeff Bingaman (D-NM)
Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
Roy Blunt (R-MO)
John Boozman (R-AR)
Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
Benjamin Cardin (D-MD)
Bob Casey, Jr. (D-PA)
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
Christopher Coons (D-DE)
Bob Corker (R-TN)
Richard Durbin (D-IL)
Mike Enzi (R-WY)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Al Franken (D-MN)
Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY)
Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
Kay Hagan (D-NC)
Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
Tim Johnson (D-SD)
Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
Herb Kohl (D-WI)
Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
Joseph Lieberman (I-CT)
John McCain (R-AZ)
Bill Nelson (D-FL)
Marco Rubio (R-FL)
Chuck Schumer (D-NY)
Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)
Tom Udall (D-NM)
Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)

This is a list of the clueless idiots and corporate shills who are bringing us this abomination.

Al Franken shreds anti-gay witness

Crosswords says...

>> ^jmzero:

If I was representing "organized religion"s interests in this debate, my position would be to get government out of the marriage business altogether. Let government oversee civil unions as a matter of contract and civil law. Let people then define marriage however they see fit. Churches would thus be in the clear to think of gays as unmarried (even if they had a civil union) or as still married even if a civil union was ended (if that church doesn't recognize divorce). Some churches would do gay marriages, some wouldn't. Similarly, some churches currently recognize a baptism performed by some other subset of churches or denominations, and some don't. And yet there isn't big fights about this or something, because there's no single government standard that everyone can't agree on.
Now, certainly, for practicality sakes there's no reason that they couldn't still do the civil union stuff in association with whatever kind of marriage ceremony is preferred - but either could also proceed without the other. Marriage is a word loaded with baggage, and is tied to personal issues and relationships that government needn't concern itself with. At the same time, the concept of a civil union is still useful in helping to protect people in a relationship - and there's perfectly good reason for the government to manage that.


That would be logical if their goal was to be allowed to freely practice their religion. Unfortunately their real goal is to make society conform to their religion. They are trying to justify their opinions, marriage between a man and woman, be having it legislated and enforced on everyone. If everyone is made to do it, it must be right.



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon