I still don't know what a blank fist is, but I can only surmise from your swagger it has something to do with your short, but well-deserved stint in the adult entertainment industry.

I salute you a high hard 5 on your big diamond day! Con gratis!

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

If anyone is ripe for puncture and derision it's the tradeshow marketroids who run this stuff. I've been to CES and Comdex - and it's pure cheese. 99% glitz 1% substance. At least the adult entertainment expo next door is honest about what it's doing.

Yes. Just yes. Someone on Kotaku (where I originally saw it) made a snide remark about virtual boy - totally and completely off. This setup is absolutely nothing like that black and red horror. I started listing out ways it's better, but it would be much faster to say there was practically nothing good about virtual boy and there is almost nothing bad about this. Imagine Punch-Out. A lightsaber game. Survival horror... I have a hard time thinking of a genre that wouldn't be improved by this. Single-screen multiplayer probably wouldn't work well, but there might be a way to do it.

After thinking of the phenomenal gaming implications I realized there's another industry which could immediately benefit from this - adult entertainment (for better or for worse). That might actually be the fastest way to get the tech adopted too - look at at VHS and the internet. There could probably be some amazing less-controversial entertainment made for it as well - a murder mystery show where you could look around the entire scene and zoom in on stuff would be pretty incredible. It would obviously have to all be rendered material rather than live-action video, but I don't think that would be too big of a problem.

In short: I will buy this. For now, I'm just going to have to find time to rig up my pc to give his demo a whirl.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'porn, marketing, affiliate, adult, entertainment, money' to 'banporn, banketing, banfiliate, bandult, bantertainment, baney' - edited by maatc

KaiEr,
"You won't hear someone say "Fu*k Bush!" on national TV... why?" -- lol, are you kidding?! you do if you watch more than just Fox News.

"Billboards for adult entertainment do not show nudity... why?" -- Because you can charge money to see it. Um, decency laws are not speech.

"You are not going to stay on a plane very long after yelling "I love terrorists!"... why?" -- um.. really.

Since you seem to know part of the Constitution, why'd you skip out the relevant part:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

So, specificly, that last part means, you can stand on public property and hold up just about any sign you want.

I know you aren't seriously trying to engage in intelligent debate, cause nothing you said makes sense. The freedom of speech applies to not being arrested for something you say. The "yell fire" counter-example to this is just dumb. As long as your speech is not threatening anyone, or cause for public concern, it should be free. Where does you brownshirt mentality end? "F*ck Bush" is that ok if the u is missing? How about "Bush sucks"? Who defines profane? Is it just what you can't say on TV regulates speech?

And your gun thing, well, this would be the same as being arrested for having a gun in your house. Or not being allowed to carry one (where conceal laws apply). 'Bear arms' does not mean waive them around or induce panic. But it does me you should be able to own them without hassle.
I'm very shocked an intelligent person like you can come to this conclusion. Maybe you don't really believe what you wrote, or maybe you are parroting something you read on freepress... but it's kind of sad. (And while I'm at it, why do you not post videos or vote for them? It's in the name of the website, not CoolForums. It further leads me to the sockpuppet conclusion)

I hate it when people become completely retarded to try to prove a point that was insane to begin with.

The Constitution does garantee freedom of speech, however, there are limits to that speech.

Billboards for adult entertainment do not show nudity... why?
You won't hear someone say "Fu*k Bush!" on national TV... why?
"The Who" is not going to start a concert in your neighbors yard... why?
You are not going to stay on a plane very long after yelling "I love terrorists!"... why?

The kid was on the side of a road, not private property. He had a sign using profanity. He argued with the police.

Bottom line, police were right, kid and moron followers were wrong.

The shortest Amendment to the Constitution states "A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" Try standing on the side of the road waving a gun around. Same principle.