That's what he *says*, but he certainly does not offer and proof / argument for this. Sure he waffles on and offers some form of malformed circular logic, but no proof.

Shinyblurry we've talked about this before, and I know you claim that you've gotten your "knowledge" of "God" from your direct explicit conversational contact with him, and a perceived personal manifestation of his presence, but personal experience doesn't stand as any kind of argument / proof for his existence.

I could say that they Stay Puft Marshmallow Man appeared to me in my room last night and told me that eating lettuce was immoral and Justin Bieber is his earthbound minnion. But I'm sure if I told you that's you'd not believe me and look for some kind of proof.

>> ^KnivesOut:

Well you know he's a secret gay muslim terrorist who is going to start governing the US under Sharia Law. I mean, he only had to fake 4 years as a "normal" president so he could get his second term, so that now he can REALLY fuck up this country by inviting his Al Qaeda mole operatives to attack the waffle house down the street.
Muslim.
9/11.

Really? Damn, that Obama is one cunning motherfucker. Good thing those Pakistanis are onto him.

Well you know he's a secret gay muslim terrorist who is going to start governing the US under Sharia Law. I mean, he only had to fake 4 years as a "normal" president so he could get his second term, so that now he can REALLY fuck up this country by inviting his Al Qaeda mole operatives to attack the waffle house down the street.

Muslim.

9/11.>> ^ChaosEngine:

>> ^Hybrid:
As a non-American, I and the rest of the world, want Obama to win. I simply do not understand how it is such a close call in America itself, yet the rest of the world clearly sees that Obama is the only logical vote...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20008687

Amen, brother. Romney should put that in his campaign.
"Romney! Slightly more people in Pakistan reckon he'd be a better president than Obama"
@shinyblurry, you said that "Obama is going to radically transform this country even further (for the worst)". Exactly what "radical" transformations has the US undergone? From the outside, it looks pretty much as it always did (with marginally more humane healthcare).

Apart from watching the record attempt itself, the rest of the video was filled with so much waffle...

The video could be two hours long... the thing is if his incredibly waffling and outright 180'ing on issues hasn't made you realize what a flake he is already this video sure isn't going to change your mind....

>> ^Deano:

>> ^spoco2:
Hey look, it's a short, amusing and witty way of saying what took this life sapping video over 13 minutes to only half get across.
Upvote

I accept that guy's point but he does go on a bit. I've stopped watching that one and i hope I'm not missing any relevatory stuff towards the end.


I skipped around the whole thing. No, no you're not. It's the usual waffle.

Brain bug = original blue waffle.....?
Amazing work none the less.

Yes, if you don't support gay marriage, you are, by definition, anti-gay. (I have never heard of any gay person who doesn't like straight people getting married. Have you???)

You're correct that homosexuals aren't defined by their ability to marry one another. They, like all humans, are defined in part by their rights, of which marriage is one.

You're correct, Chik Fil-A didn't donate to anti-gay campaigns. They donated to the anti-gay organizations that run them. Same difference, as far as I'm concerned, but if you want to split hairs...

As our country is more closely aligned with fascism inasmuch as government is "gay married" to the corporations, then where/how corporations spend their money is of increasing importance to the consumers who are, in essence, voting to support issues with their dollars.

Your analogy of the birthday present is not the same thing, because I, unlike a corporation, do not have political power like they do. If the present was $50 Million, and it was donated to Al Qaeda, then yes, you would have supported terrorism with your "gift."

Anyone who says the following is clearly running an anti-gay agenda:
"I think we are inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at Him and say 'we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage' and I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to try to redefine what marriage is all about."

Dan Cathy, Chick-Fil-A Pres. and COO, The Ken Coleman Show, June 16th.


... even though he clearly has little understanding of how marriage was originally defined in the Bible (which commands that brothers-in-law marry widows, or that rapists marry the women they rape) as if that even mattered!.


>> ^Edgeman2112:

>> ^Trancecoach:
You're right. The fact that they do things for married couples doesn't mean that they're anti-gay. The fact that they donate large bundles of money to anti-gay campaigns, on the other hand, does mean that they support anti-gay policies.
Did you not watch the video??>> ^Edgeman2112:
This is reaaaaaaaaaaaallly stretching it. Just because they do things for married couples doesn't mean they hate gays. I side with the chicken people on this one because they're a victim of gross generalization.


Yes I watched the video, but you are the one who fell for the sensationalism.
Let's be rational and fair here. If you don't support gay marriage, does that automatically label you as anti-gay? F-ck no it doesn't. If gay people don't like straight people getting married, does that make they're anti-straight? F-ck no it doesn't. It's a ludicrous generalization.
Each group of people isn't defined by their ability to marry one another. This is the mistake complainers are often guilty of making.
And no, they didn't make donations to anti-gay campaigns. They made donations to the organizations. What they then do with that money is not Chic Fil A's business. If I give you 50$ for a birthday present, then you donate that to Al-Queda, the media will portray me as supporting terrorism.
I don't like to jump to conclusions based on things I hear on the internet, and I do love that spicy chicken sandwich with a half and half sweet tea and waffle fries.

>> ^Trancecoach:

You're right. The fact that they do things for married couples doesn't mean that they're anti-gay. The fact that they donate large bundles of money to anti-gay campaigns, on the other hand, does mean that they support anti-gay policies.
Did you not watch the video??>> ^Edgeman2112:
This is reaaaaaaaaaaaallly stretching it. Just because they do things for married couples doesn't mean they hate gays. I side with the chicken people on this one because they're a victim of gross generalization.



Yes I watched the video, but you are the one who fell for the sensationalism.

Let's be rational and fair here. If you don't support gay marriage, does that automatically label you as anti-gay? F-ck no it doesn't. If gay people don't like straight people getting married, does that make they're anti-straight? F-ck no it doesn't. It's a ludicrous generalization.

Each group of people isn't defined by their ability to marry one another. This is the mistake complainers are often guilty of making.

And no, they didn't make donations to anti-gay campaigns. They made donations to the organizations. What they then do with that money is not Chic Fil A's business. If I give you 50$ for a birthday present, then you donate that to Al-Queda, the media will portray me as supporting terrorism.

I don't like to jump to conclusions based on things I hear on the internet, and I do love that spicy chicken sandwich with a half and half sweet tea and waffle fries.

This is pretty funny



I am going to eat four eggo waffles for dinner.

lol, no mistake, it was incredibly sarcastic. I just refuse to use the check box! It's Sarcasm for Dummies!

I haven't seen you making an ass of yourself, by the way.. Maybe I don't get around much, but I've never once thought you were an ass
In reply to this comment by RhesusMonk:
I don't think you're fragile. I've made an ass of myself recently (not that you would know, I suppose) by being overly aggressive/defensive I just wanted to make sure I wasn't being a dick as your initial response could very easily have been interpreted as sarcastic. \^\^
In reply to this comment by UsesProzac:
lol.... Why do people think I'm some fragile thing? I just don't like being called "dog shit." You didn't do anything to offend me! Snarky responses are an every day thing for me :
In reply to this comment by RhesusMonk:
Just to be clear: Absolutely zero offense or criticism of any kind intended or even contemplated.
In reply to this comment by UsesProzac:
>> ^RhesusMonk:

I get the joke. It's a stupid joke. Some of the in-joke videos have been hysterical. This one is not.


Sweet, glad you were able to downvote it without waffling like others. I'm really proud of you. I'm marking your day's work as Satisfactory.

I don't think you're fragile. I've made an ass of myself recently (not that you would know, I suppose) by being overly aggressive/defensive I just wanted to make sure I wasn't being a dick as your initial response could very easily have been interpreted as sarcastic.
In reply to this comment by UsesProzac:
lol.... Why do people think I'm some fragile thing? I just don't like being called "dog shit." You didn't do anything to offend me! Snarky responses are an every day thing for me :
In reply to this comment by RhesusMonk:
Just to be clear: Absolutely zero offense or criticism of any kind intended or even contemplated.
In reply to this comment by UsesProzac:
>> ^RhesusMonk:

I get the joke. It's a stupid joke. Some of the in-joke videos have been hysterical. This one is not.


Sweet, glad you were able to downvote it without waffling like others. I'm really proud of you. I'm marking your day's work as Satisfactory.

lol.... Why do people think I'm some fragile thing? I just don't like being called "dog shit." You didn't do anything to offend me! Snarky responses are an every day thing for me
In reply to this comment by RhesusMonk:
Just to be clear: Absolutely zero offense or criticism of any kind intended or even contemplated.
In reply to this comment by UsesProzac:
>> ^RhesusMonk:

I get the joke. It's a stupid joke. Some of the in-joke videos have been hysterical. This one is not.


Sweet, glad you were able to downvote it without waffling like others. I'm really proud of you. I'm marking your day's work as Satisfactory.

Just to be clear: Absolutely zero offense or criticism of any kind intended or even contemplated.
In reply to this comment by UsesProzac:
>> ^RhesusMonk:

I get the joke. It's a stupid joke. Some of the in-joke videos have been hysterical. This one is not.


Sweet, glad you were able to downvote it without waffling like others. I'm really proud of you. I'm marking your day's work as Satisfactory.