Shouldn't this have a gay tag? It's technically two penises &@$%-ing inside of each other.

There's also this one: http://videosift.com/video/The-World-s-Most-Terrifying-Penises-The-Leopard-Slug

But it has one of the most annoying voice tracks ever. Attenborough ftw.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Great special effects. Part of me recoils (ha) a bit. As a father of a young boy- I'm really starting to come up against the glorification of guns in our culture. I know from experience that's it's built in to boys- we have a no toy gun rule in the house- and yet, he's fashioned a whole armoury of weapons out of Lego.

Guns are giant metal penises shooting lead semen of domination. It appeals to me too- watching something like this gets the adrenalin flowing. I just wish it didn't.

Seriously, when you think about it, that little penis drawing was well ahead of its time. If you asked the internet to come up with ideas of art to send to the moon, I bet at least 60% of it would be little penises.

Reminds me of my favourite stand-up act.

"Women, who here hates small penises?" *ROAR*

"Yeah, ya see, the thing is we're not so crazy about huge vaginas either"

*Men Cheering...oddly women are quiet and sheepish*

Secretely straight women want to be with other women who have penises.. I'm sure of it. Women have boobs and curves that make people go crazy, men have driving skills.

To be fair, I'll use just about anything as an excuse.>> ^deathcow:

this is the kind of shit that causes you to bury shark penises in the sand and then dig them up for food years later

this is the kind of shit that causes you to bury shark penises in the sand and then dig them up for food years later

By the power of residing in the Equality State, I dub this *quality.

BTW, I just learned that according to condom manufacturer Condomania, Wyoming has the smallest penises in the union. But never fear, for we have the highest gun ownership rate in the nation. Didn't see that coming, did ya?

>> ^dag:

I've never had a problem with the quoting. I'm wondering what happens to mess it up for people. Are you editing the tags after pressing the quote button? I'll withhold my vote till then.


I've only had actual bugs on rare occasions until recently. Sometimes deleting the comment body and re-copying the quoted text would fix it, but it doesn't seem to be doing any good lately. I did no editing to the quoted text here or here.

It's also worth noting there are two types of problems here: bugs and undesirable features. These two examples are bugs. The fact that quotes are forced to the bottom is not a bug but an undesirable feature (at least for some of us).

Like @gwiz665 I also like the appearance of quotes. It does get a little bulky, though, even when it works right. I'm a fan of simple systems in general. The old system was simple but visually unappealing. It was fairly easy to work with, though. If you wanted to hack a quote up into pieces or put it at the top, middle or bottom of your comment, it was trivial to do so. The new one is pretty but it only works one way and if you want something else, you're SOL. Kinda like a Mac.

So... if men with average penises tend to be better at satisfying women than men with macropenises. And men with micropenises tend to be better at satisfying women than average men. Does that mean the ideal lover is likely to be someone without a penis?

>> ^Matthu:

I maintain that this is not relevant to my interests.



Oh, so you're a lesbian then? :-D

Who cares about penises. You can always use your forearm if she is not satisfied. It's all about one thing - MONEY and BLING. If you got your shit together, women will just fall in your lap.

>> ^rougy:

Vaginas...they're for everyone.

I think you mean "Vaginas. They're what's for dinner. And occasionally lunch and breakfast too."

Actually it raises the question, Mr Fancy Engineering Degree.
>> ^rottenseed:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://eric3579.videosift.com" title="member since January 22nd, 2007" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(124, 252, 0);">eric3579
Hey, you were the one that posted this...which only begs the question about what you were searching for when you came across this video.


Don't be so insensitive; the correct term is micropenis.
>> ^gwiz665:

anatomy for tiny ding-dongs.