Congratulations! Your video, The You Fool! Sequence from Hollywood Squares, has reached the #1 spot in the current Top 15 New Videos listing. This is a very difficult thing to accomplish but you managed to pull it off. For your contribution you have been awarded 2 Power Points.

This achievement has earned you your "Golden One" Level 141 Badge!

Your video, The You Fool! Sequence from Hollywood Squares, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

The answer is no. She is a nobody. She was barely even famous in the Hollywood Squares kind of way once. This is why she has turned to hate-mongering for attention. Damn, she is way ugly too. Lesson kids, hate makes you uglier.
>> ^legacy0100:

Who the hell is Victoria Jackson and should I care to no? I'm guessing the answer is no?

This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by chicchorea.

*isdupe>> ^Zifnab:

Great, but I'd have to call dupe on this... The other one is very old and poor quality and longer, but still a dupe IMO:
dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Hollywood-Squares-You-Fool

Great, but I'd have to call dupe on this... The other one is very old and poor quality and longer, but still a dupe IMO:

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Hollywood-Squares-You-Fool

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Zifnab. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

>> ^dgandhi:
This and QI have got to be the cheapest TV productions this side of Faux News, and yet we in the US can't manage to cobble together half a dozen celebs who can manage to be more extemporaneously interesting than hollywood squares. It makes me laugh, but the quality gap saddens me.


There's plenty of others, of varying quality (Have I Got News For You, Mock the Week and at times Never Mind the Buzzcocks are good). I was wondering the other day why all the quiz-coms (that's what our schedulers seem to want us to call them) are British. It's a simple format, get a topic (current affairs, public opinion, music, whatever), a host who's good at improvised comedy and several similarly minded guests and make sure all of them have an IQ of above 50. 8 out of 10 cats fails occasionally on the last requirement (Kelly Osbourne, for example). I don't know if it's been tried in the US or elsewhere. I can imagine American producers getting Kevin Federline and Paris Hilton as guests and then wondering why it bombs.

You have got The Big Bang Theory, which makes up for a lot.

This and QI have got to be the cheapest TV productions this side of Faux News, and yet we in the US can't manage to cobble together half a dozen celebs who can manage to be more extemporaneously interesting than hollywood squares. It makes me laugh, but the quality gap saddens me.

I would love to see the narrator's You Fool! replaced with that of Gilbert Gottfried http://www.videosift.com/video/Hollywood-Squares-You-Fool

Perfect Hollywood Squares contestant

"I'll Disagree"
"No, sorry, water is Wet. Circle gets the square."