Tags for this video have been changed from 'dave chappelle, 15, how old is fifteen really, fifteen' to 'dave chappelle, 15, how old is fifteen really, fifteen, elizabeth smart, r kelly' - edited by xxovercastxx

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Elizabeth Alexandra Mary, cunt, whore, bitch, killer, slaveowner, FKKN News, MDK' to 'Elizabeth Alexandra Mary, Monarchy, Abolish, Queen, fknnewz' - edited by Sagemind

Tags for this video have been changed from 'prometheus, viral, quiet eye, elizabeth shaw' to 'prometheus, viral, quiet eye, elizabeth shaw, noomi rapace' - edited by RhesusMonk

Thanks for the promotes Two more down...
In reply to this comment by UsesProzac:
*promote

Though he is not the 99% warrior I'd like him to be, he is at least a step in the right direction. It'll be interesting to see if he gets a little more aggressive on Wall Street in his second term, considering he won't have to worry about reelection. Maybe Elizabeth Warren will run in 2016.

I can get behind that historian's way of describing it, and I agree with what you're saying about how the Civil War went down. I just disagree with your assessment of what Paul himself said -- he didn't just say "it's not the only issue" he later says "it wasn't the deciding issue" which is just...wrong.

The South seceded and fired the first shots because they wanted to keep their slaves so badly they'd rather leave the Union than give them up.

There was a confluence of other issues involved in the conflict, but "State's rights" was and always has been a euphemism for the bargain that was struck at the signing of the Constitution to let some states keep slavery, not some separate, lofty moral principle that has nothing to do with slavery.

>> ^Skeeve:

"While slavery and its various and multifaceted discontents were the primary cause of disunion, it was disunion itself that sparked the war." - Elizabeth R. Varon, Bruce Levine, Marc Egnal, and Michael Holt at a plenary session of the organization of American Historians, March 17, 2011.
Most historical works I have read about the American Civil War explain that, from the North's perspective, the war wasn't to end slavery, but to preserve the union. That said, the South's reason for seceding was based more heavily on protecting their right to have slaves.
As with all wars, there wasn't just one cause and, as much as I dislike Ron Paul, I have to agree with his statement that slavery wasn't the only reason for the Civil War.>> ^NetRunner:
>> ^Kreegath:
However, he does make his opinion clear that he doesn't think ending slavery was the deciding reason for the civil war, something that I've actually heard is a historically defensible position.

Heard from who?

"While slavery and its various and multifaceted discontents were the primary cause of disunion, it was disunion itself that sparked the war." - Elizabeth R. Varon, Bruce Levine, Marc Egnal, and Michael Holt at a plenary session of the organization of American Historians, March 17, 2011.

Most historical works I have read about the American Civil War explain that, from the North's perspective, the war wasn't to end slavery, but to preserve the union. That said, the South's reason for seceding was based more heavily on protecting their right to have slaves.

As with all wars, there wasn't just one cause and, as much as I dislike Ron Paul, I have to agree with his statement that slavery wasn't the only reason for the Civil War.>> ^NetRunner:

>> ^Kreegath:
However, he does make his opinion clear that he doesn't think ending slavery was the deciding reason for the civil war, something that I've actually heard is a historically defensible position.

Heard from who?

^ What kceaton1 said.

I've had it. I will write in candidates for all Dem incumbents. Repugs will never get my vote, but I've absolutely had it with this phony, silver-tongued COWARD of a President and his entire cast of enablers. The Nobel committee must be feeling pretty fucking foolish by now. Obama, you are a piece of shit! I'll be writing in "Phil McKracken" for president next year (or Elizabeth Warren).

"I'm Elizabeth Warren, and I approve this message. And Karl Rove can suck it, beyotch!!"

>> ^Enzoblue:

Shame she's a methodist, otherwise I'm on board.


Let's hope that is a purely political association, rather than a cognitive pit of despair!

Many thanks!

In reply to this comment by oritteropo:
You just edit the embed to include a start=secs parameter, with the number of seconds into the video you want it to start. You have to do this for both (or at least the 2nd) url, the first one puts the red dot at the start point, the 2nd actually starts there.

The one you were looking at was:

<br /> &lt;object classid=&quot;clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; height=&quot;401&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/BtJuoAl8iWE?version=3&amp;controls=1&amp;fs=1&amp;border=0&amp;autoplay=0&amp;cc_load_policy=0
&amp;iv_load_policy">http://www.youtube.com/v/BtJuoAl8iWE?version=3&amp;controls=1&amp;fs=1&amp;border=0&amp;autoplay=0&am
p;amp;cc_load_policy=0&amp;iv_load_policy</a><br /> =3&amp;loop=0&amp;egm=0&amp;rel=0&amp;showsearch=0&amp;start=90&amp;modestbranding=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;theme=dark&
;quot;/&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowFullScreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot;/&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowScriptAccess&quot; value=&quot;always&quot;/&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/BtJuoAl8iWE?version=3&amp;controls=1&amp;fs=1&amp;border=0&amp;autoplay=0&amp;cc_load_policy=0
&amp;iv_load_policy=3">http://www.youtube.com/v/BtJuoAl8iWE?version=3&amp;controls=1&amp;fs=1&amp;border=0&amp;autoplay=0&
amp;amp;cc_load_policy=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3</a><br /> &amp;loop=0&amp;egm=0&amp;rel=0&amp;showsearch=0&amp;start=90&amp;modestbranding=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;theme=dark&q
uot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot; allowscriptaccess=&quot;always&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; height=&quot;401&quot;/&gt;&lt;/object&gt;<br />

I don't normally put the start= in the middle like that, I normally put it after the theme=dark.

There are other options you can tweak, documented here:
http://code.google.com/apis/youtube/player_parameters.html

I found mention of a chrome thingy to do it for you if you use chrome:
http://www.mydigitallife.info/youtube-all
ows-you-to-start-playing-embed-video-at-specific-start-time/

Obviously pros and cons vs using lucky's vs submit one.

Now if you just want a segment out of the middle... then you have to use tubechop.
In reply to this comment by calvados:
Opo, how'd you get the video embed with a specific start time? I thought that only worked with the URL.

You just edit the embed to include a start=secs parameter, with the number of seconds into the video you want it to start. You have to do this for both (or at least the 2nd) url, the first one puts the red dot at the start point, the 2nd actually starts there.

The one you were looking at was:


<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="500" height="401"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BtJuoAl8iWE?version=3&controls=1&fs=1&border=0&autoplay=0&cc_load_policy=0&iv_load_policy
=3&loop=0&egm=0&rel=0&showsearch=0&start=90&modestbranding=0&showinfo=0&theme=dark"/><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BtJuoAl8iWE?version=3&controls=1&fs=1&border=0&autoplay=0&cc_load_policy=0&iv_load_policy=3
&loop=0&egm=0&rel=0&showsearch=0&start=90&modestbranding=0&showinfo=0&theme=dark" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="500" height="401"/></object>


I don't normally put the start= in the middle like that, I normally put it after the theme=dark.

There are other options you can tweak, documented here:
http://code.google.com/apis/youtube/player_parameters.html

I found mention of a chrome thingy to do it for you if you use chrome:
http://www.mydigitallife.info/youtube-allows-you-to-start-playing-embed-video-at-specific-start-time/

Obviously pros and cons vs using lucky's vs submit one.

Now if you just want a segment out of the middle... then you have to use tubechop.
In reply to this comment by calvados:
Opo, how'd you get the video embed with a specific start time? I thought that only worked with the URL.

Thanks

In reply to this comment by geo321:
*quality

u da can
*die bot die

In reply to this comment by siftbot:
Adding video to channels (<a rel="nofollow" href="http://catsanddogs.videosift.com" style="color:#8FBC8F">Catsanddogs) - requested by lurgee.

>> ^siftbot:

Adding video to channels (<a rel="nofollow" href="http://femme.videosift.com" style="">Femme) - requested by lurgee.


*catsanddogs