PAT BUCHANAN: Why doesn’t he set an example and send a check for $5 billion to the federal government? He’s got about $40 billion.

What's Warren Buffoon waiting for? A gun in his face like the rest of us get?

I've always loved this song. I have searched everywhere for a video of Roy Buchanan's cover of this, but can't find it.

>> ^NetRunner:



McLaughlin and Eleanor Clift have the most balanced views and the most insight. Buchanan has said some remarkably progressive things on there considering who he is, and some remarkably backwards things.

The tone of the show isn't personally confrontational--they get worked up about ideas but they don't personally attack each other or their credibility.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Pat Buchanan, texting, auto, tune, news' to 'Pat Buchanan, texting, auto, tune, news, lol to omg' - edited by spoco2

In reply to this comment by CaveBear:
In reply to this comment by demon_ix:
Missing One:

5. Old

To be honest, since a Supreme Court Justice is a lifetime appointment, age is a valid point, and thus, not relevant to my post

In reply to this comment by demon_ix:
Missing One:

1. White.
2. Male.
3. Christian.
4. Republican.
5. Old

Several of the facts Pat states in this video are later corrected by Rachel, given some time to research the material.

http://www.videosift.com/video/Maddow-Corrects-the-Record-on-Pat-Buchanan

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Rachel, Maddow, Pat, Buchanan, Sonia, Sotomayor, reverse, discrimination, white, minority' to 'Rachel Maddow, Pat Buchanan, Sonia Sotomayor, reverse, discrimination, white, minority' - edited by xxovercastxx

As always, Buchanan likes to blame the ethnics for everything, including climate change.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Pat, Buchanan, climate, change, science, hoax, scam, wealth, power' to 'Pat Buchanan, climate change, science, hoax, scam, wealth, power' - edited by xxovercastxx

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Pat, Buchanan, advice, Todd, Palin, Levi, Johnston, drown' to 'Pat Buchanan, advice, Todd Palin, Levi Johnston, drown' - edited by xxovercastxx

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Buchanan, Hendrix, 70s, Telecaster' to 'Buchanan, Hendrix, 70s, Telecaster, hey joe, foxy lady' - edited by kronosposeidon

The correct term is "Sissy Hawk" :

Armchair Warriors - the Sissy Hawk Brigade

A Sissy Hawk Cheer:
“All-out war is still our druthers,
Fiercely fought, and fought by others!”
-Calvin Trillin, 'Obliviously On He Sails : The Bush Administration in Rhyme'

In his list of Sissy Hawks he forgot to mention :
- Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary of Defense and intellectual guru of the Bush regime - no military service
- "Dick" Cheney - no military service
- George Tenet, CIA Director, no military service
- Condoleezza Rice, National Security Advisor - No military service. -
- Jeb Bush, Florida governor - No military service. -
- Rudy Giuliani, Former NYC mayor - No military service
- Pat Buchanan, MSNBC commentator - No military service.
- Ann Coulter, writer & commentator- No military service.
- Sean Hannity, Hannity & Colmes host - No military service
- Brit Hume, Fox News anchor - No military service.
- Rush Limbaugh, Radio talk show host - No military service.
- Bill O'Reilly, O'Reilly Factor host - No military service.
- Michael Savage, Radio talk show host - No military service.

>> ^quantumushroom:
So it's "treason" now to question El Presidente?


And here I was thinking it was one women exercising her right to express an opinion. Funnily enough, Rush does that all that time.

I love how "free speech" suddenly falls off the bill of rights when you are criticising the wingnuts of the republican party... =)



Some clarification is in order for our socialist friends

Blah blah blah, nothing new here... =)

Wanda was spot on and it's nice to hear her openly attack Rush's ridiculous comments. Pat Buchanan and the rest of the conservatives still dont fucking get it. To us their party IS a joke. They keep using the same rhetoric over and over again when they should be trying to make valid criticisms of the current administration.