Hey, please change the label of this video.
http://www.videosift.com/video/Atheist-Experience-Just-Another-Great-Caller

The long label is for videos longer than 10 minutes.

>> ^nibiyabi:
notlong nochannel religion terrible philosophy


No such thing as a *notlong invocation.

Here's one of the better discussions...

http://www.videosift.com/video/Excellent-Debate-From-the-Atheist-Experience

Flood -

Here's a pretty good one -

http://www.videosift.com/video/Excellent-Debate-From-the-Atheist-Experience

In reply to this comment by Flood:
I like these guys, I really do. And I have a lot of respect for what they do. But most of the time these things are just so painful to listen to. So many of their callers are just plain stupid, regardless of their philosophical views, the callers are just stupid people.

Can you find any more of the good ones where they actually talk to an intelligent theist?

>> ^Flood:
I like these guys, I really do. And I have a lot of respect for what they do. But most of the time these things are just so painful to listen to. So many of their callers are just plain stupid, regardless of their philosophical views, the callers are just stupid people.
Can you find any more of the good ones where they actually talk to an intelligent theist?


I agree. Except that the issue is not always stupidity but ignorance, which is a completely different thing. But yeah there is little to gain from these videos if one person during the exchange, has little to none sound arguments.
(plus you clog the philosophy channel with cheap philosophy )

It's been established that you can also sift your own playlist without running aground of the self-linking rule, so long as the contained videos are not yours.

In reply to this comment by ObsidianStorm:
Thanks! Great suggestion - I didn't know that existed.

It's been swapped.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
You can swap this embed with this playlist of the whole debate if you want:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=DDA4661AC27815DA

Thanks! Great suggestion - I didn't know that existed.

It's been swapped.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
You can swap this embed with this playlist of the whole debate if you want:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=DDA4661AC27815DA

>> ^MINK:
now who's making the mistake of reading the bible literally?


The people who think it's actually true?

the atheist experience is actually loony yanks who live to close to fundamentalists.

^How about I come down there and punch you in the face for Jesus?!

>> ^shuac:
>> ^White:

Don't you find it disturbing that there is the same amount of proof that god exists as fairies? Or unicorns? Or elves? Or zeus? Or shiva? Or thor? Or osiris? Or isis? Or the flying spaghetti monster? Or the celestial teapot? I can keep going...I've got a whole list here.


Or love? Guess it doesnt exist huh?

>> ^MINK:
i can't be arsed to do this any more.
even as these guys are preaching their interpretation of "rationality"... real scientists are discovering alternate dimensions and completely different concepts of reality.
Real scientists don't know shit, they research in wonder. Only the egomaniac publicity whores preach their "final answer" with such glee. These guys were so obviously bullied in school.


What a mouth breather's take on things.

I saw the original of this. How did you edit it...you Los Angeles-based video editor? Cool, I'm just like the Atheist Experience caller who answered his own questions!

Much appreciated.

In reply to this comment by Raigen:
You get a goddamn Gold Star from me for that post, Gwiz.

If you cant prove that god exists, and I cant prove that he doesn't then why the fuck are we arguing. Why call a show called the Atheist Experience with beliefs about god and expect the hosts not to flame the caller?


Secondly I know first hand that God finds it amusing that I am smug in front of him.