>> ^EDD:
>> ^ForgedReality:
Ah, she just needs an aimhack. Turns any noob into a pro!

I think you meant 'aimbot', n00b.
Although she could also do just as well with the good ol' fashioned no-recoil.


Actually, I was debating on whether or not to use the term 'aimbot,' as most sifters here might be less likely to recognize it and know what I was talking about. 'Hack' is generally more understood, and since my target audience is n00bs, the message still goes through as intended.

>> ^ForgedReality:
Ah, she just needs an aimhack. Turns any noob into a pro!


I think you meant 'aimbot', n00b.

Although she could also do just as well with the good ol' fashioned no-recoil.

>> ^jerryku:
Re: the Uzi story, automatic Uzis are legal in the US? o_O


Yes, you can get them but you have to pay a $200 tax on the transfer first.

>> ^krelokk:
No, yourhydra is correct. She has not been trained properly and those guys were fucking idiots. The title is 'Duck!! it's a russian blonde'. Implying everything that comes with idiotic dumb blonde jokes. So yeah of course that is what the video is about, that is obvious. But it still suggests stupidity on her part when it's the dumbasses who brought her there and gave an untrained civilian a ak47 who are to blame.


"DUCK! Dumbass Russian men didn't train their friend, who happens to be a blonde woman, how to operate an AK-47" would have been a MUCH better title.

Obsessive political correctness makes me sick.

>> ^arvana:
The title is not saying anything against Russians, blondes, or women.  It just happens that the subject of this video is all of those things.
>> ^yourhydra:
maybe the apparently smart and capable MEN should have taught her to use the gun before giving it to her?




No, yourhydra is correct. She has not been trained properly and those guys were fucking idiots. The title is 'Duck!! it's a russian blonde'. Implying everything that comes with idiotic dumb blonde jokes. So yeah of course that is what the video is about, that is obvious. But it still suggests stupidity on her part when it's the dumbasses who brought her there and gave an untrained civilian a ak47 who are to blame.

Your video, DUCK!!! It's a Russian blonde with an AK-47!, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

The title is not saying anything against Russians, blondes, or women.  It just happens that the subject of this video is all of those things.

>> ^yourhydra:
maybe the apparently smart and capable MEN should have taught her to use the gun before giving it to her?

>> ^maximillian:
For those who do not wish to click...an 8 year old boy kills himself when the Uzi he was shooting at a gun club flipped around and shot him in the head.

Well, some might say that 8 year olds are supposed to play ball and not shoot (automatic) weapons in the first place. But to each his own, I guess.

I was going to tell you about the time I was addicted to porn and robbed drug dealers at gunpoint to pay for my addiction. I got a life sentence in Thailand for that, but was kidnapped by one of the guards and sold into black market prostitution where I was castrated and made into a very ugly ladyboy. After three years working the bars of Pattaya, I earned enough to pay off my debt of 12000 baht to my pimp and was free to leave the prostitution ring.

With no money, no clothes and no penis, I had to beg for meals and shelter for six years while I made my trek from Thailand to the deserts of Kandahar, Afghanistan. There, I took refuge with a local resistance movement and was taught how to fire an AK-47 and rig explosives. Shortly thereafter I was sent to New York to... um... nevermind, 9/11 was an inside job.

This video has been declared a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by rasch187.

Do a search before posting vids.

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/AK-47-from-Jackie-Brown

Hey! Repost!

In reply to this comment by nomino:
*discard

http://www.videosift.com/video/Computer-Animation-of-AK-47-Glock-9mm-38-inner-mechanism

I know you like firearms

Seem like a nice enough chap, but i did a little research...



'He fully acknowledges giving financial support for Muslim combatants.

A police search of his home reportedly found night vision goggles, a bulletproof vest, and extremist Islamic literature.

He was again arrested in 2000 under British anti-terrorism laws during a raid on the Maktabah Al Ansar bookshop in Birmingham, which he had founded. The British government retrieved encrypted files from his computer and ordered Begg to open them, but Begg refused.

in 2000, his store was found to offer such titles as The Virtues of Jihad and Declaration of War. In 1999 the store commissioned and published a book which said such things as "Terror works and that is why the believers are commanded to enforce it by Allah.


A Summary of Evidence memo of the following allegations against him:

a. The detainee is a member of al Qaida and other affiliated terrorist organizations.

1. The detainee recruited individuals to attend al Qaida run terrorist training camps in Afghanistan.
2. The detainee provided money and material support to al Qaida terrorist training camps.
3. The detainee has received extensive training at al Qaida run terrorist training camps since 1993. He has been trained on the AK-47, Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPGs), handgun, ambush theory, detection of land mines and he manufacture of improvised grenades.
4. The detainee provided support to al Qaida terrorists by providing shelter for their families while the al Qaida members committed terrorist acts.
b. The detainees engaged in hostile acts against the United States or its coalition Partners.
1. The detainee was armed and prepared to fight on the frontlines against US and allied forces alongside Taliban and al Qaida fighters.
2. The detainee retreated to the Tora Bora Afghanistan along with other Taliban and al Qaida fighters.
3. The detainee engaged in these hostile actions while neither he nor his fellow fighters wore distinctive military emblems on their clothes, not followed a typical chain of command.
4. The detainee provided support to Usama Bin Laden's al Qaida terrorist network with full knowledge that Bin Laden had issued a declaration of war against the United States and that the al Qaida network had committed numerous terrorist attacks against the United States and its citizens.

Begg's known and suspected contacts with extremists:

Shahid Akram Butt
* Leader of the 'Lynx Gang', in Birmingham, England known associate of Begg arrested in Britain for fraud and in Yemen on conspiring to cause death and destruction
Khalil al-Deek
* lived in Peshawar, Pakistan while Begg lived there;
* invested with Begg
Abu Zubaydah
* an associate of al-Deek;
* Begg claims never to have met Zubaydah, but United States Department of Defense (DoD) says he admitted to it during interrogation.
Richard C. Reid
* DoD suspects links
Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi
* DoD suspects links
Abu Qatada
* DoD suspects links
Dhiren Barot
* Wrote a book that was commissioned and published by Begg's bookshop'




Just saying...

(Did you expect people in extremist groups to be big scary green monsters?)

>> ^imstellar28:
I don't know much about libertarianism, but what little i do know doesn't lead me to believe a libertarian would support liberalism. They may have something in common with the personal freedoms democrats espouse, but economically they are absolutely incompatible.
Thus, given that the author's argument revolves around an economic premise--I cannot see how it is in any way convincing. The statement "War is the antithesis of the libertarian philosophy of consent, voluntarism and trade,” is just patently false. There is nothing inherent in libertarianism, to my knowledge, that condemns a legally sanctioned war. Illegal war should be condemned by all parties, regardless of political affiliation.


You come across as one of the most doctrinally strict libertarians around these here parts.

Personally I don't see the argument made as revolving around an economic premise -- instead it's revolving around the premise that the current Republican party is anti-libertarian in the extreme, favoring a reduction of individual freedom, and an increase in the size of government; tax cuts entirely paid for by borrowing from other countries isn't shrinking the size of government at all, it's just forcing government to expand taxation at a later time.

Democrats have a respect for personal liberty that Republicans do not, and are in line with libertarians on social issues. Democrats do want to expand government, but it's a means to an end, not an end in and of itself.

Obama in particular is a new kind of Democrat, who's happy to kill programs that don't work, has no beef with the 2nd amendment (just with AK-47's in the hands of drug dealers), and believes that command and control-style economic plans should be used sparingly, and always kept under scrutiny.

Personally, I don't see how Libertarians aren't rallying behind Obama, if only to block the continued ascendancy of the anti-libertarian Republicans, who only use libertarian philosophy as a set of marketing slogans, nothing more.