search results matching tag: 1952
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (68) | Sift Talk (1) | Blogs (7) | Comments (50) |
Videos (68) | Sift Talk (1) | Blogs (7) | Comments (50) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
"Premakes" The Avengers (1952)
4 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.
"Premakes" The Avengers (1952)
This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by jonny.
The Great Refrigerator Magnet Giveaway! (Sift Talk Post)
let's see if this one sifts:
http://videosift.com/video/50-s-TV-General-Electric-refrigerator-commercial-1952
EDIT: add
http://videosift.com/video/Magnetic-Thinking-Putty-is-Awesome
YOU learn something NEW every DAY ! (Talks Talk Post)
I learned a few things about the history of heavy-duty 'clearing solutions' for seeing bone in animal tissue (modify the optical index of refraction such that light of visible wavelengths travel easier through animal tissue)...
google search for:
CLEARING SPECIMENS FOR THE DEMONSTRATION OF BONE
R. W. CUMLEY, J. F. CROW and A. B. GRIFFEN (1939)
or, if you need to see them bones faster...
A RAPID METHOD FOR CLEARING AND STAINING
SPECIMENS FOR THE DEMONSTRATION OF BONE
MARGARET C. GREEN (1952)
"Do What You Want"..? (Exposing Satanism in Society)
Not true. Do what thou wilt is directly from the Book of the Law which Crowley wrote and which he said he received from a spirit, ie a demon..perhaps even from Satan himself.
As far as "true hearted" rebellion goes, Satan is the original rebel and all of this so-called freedom of thought is systemic from his desire to usurp Gods position and authority. It isnt at all restrictive to follow the moral law of God, its in fact the only real fredom, and its provided to liberate us from slavery to sin and to the devil. It's the forbidden fruit redux, where humanity is yet again not trusting God but seeking after the knowledge himself, which the devil happily provides, leading the children as the pied piper into the pits of hell.
Yes, not everyone fears God, but not everyone has the common sense not to stick their finger in an electric socket either. There is a concise explanation for sin, and accepting Christ isn't a license to sin. Disobedience to God is never a moot point, saved or not. This video is speaking to the heart of the deception, which is the satanic lie of "do your own thing". It's relative versus absolute truth. It's at the roots of this wicked and perverse generation, which rejects Gods moral authority and seeks only to glorify itself.
I have had personal experience with demons and demon possession, and know they are working to deceive every person about the truth; to lead people away from God. What the bible says about this world being under dominion of Satan is not an exaggeration..it is the horrifying truth of this place, that there is deception working against you on every conceivable level. It really comes down to what kind of person you are..if you are content with the lie, if it suits your moral character, if you love the world instead of the one who made it, then you have already earned your reward and will seek nothing further. Unless this wickedness offends you and unless you want something better, the lie will be all you see. Mick and all the rest of these delusionals are working to spread the satanic lie, many willingly and knowingly. Selling your soul in rock and roll isn't just a popular expression but a literal truth.
>> ^enoch:
crowley was a reknowned occultist and mystic.
he created his own tarot deck based on the egyptian god THOTH but he did not write the satanic bible,that was anton zandor levy a particularly self involved douchebag.
"do what thou whilt,may it harm none" is a wiccan edict drawn from the amalgamation of druidic,celtic and nordic theosophy and was adopted by crowley but was not created by him.wicca was brought to the states in 1952 by brent gardner from england and the secretive coven,which had remained so from the eyes of the church for years,ex-communicated him for his revealing of their ways.
i would not call the artist and musicians who balked at the churchs authoritarian ways as demonic philosophy but rather a true hearted rebellion against the stranglehold the church represented on many who may see things different.
not everyone is god-fearing and the church has never truly established a concise and singular explanation concerning original sin and even if it DID succeed in doing that,chirst died for the forgiveness of those sins.so the point is moot if you have accepted jesus as savior.
again i find videos such as these highly manipulative using imagery and cherry picked material to promote a narrative and for the layman this video may be seen as informative but it is more akin to propaganda meant to frighten those who may not know the facts.
be scared of mick jagger..booga booga!
>> ^enoch:
crowley was a reknowned occultist and mystic.
he created his own tarot deck based on the egyptian god THOTH but he did not write the satanic bible,that was anton zandor levy a particularly self involved douchebag.
"do what thou whilt,may it harm none" is a wiccan edict drawn from the amalgamation of druidic,celtic and nordic theosophy and was adopted by crowley but was not created by him.wicca was brought to the states in 1952 by brent gardner from england and the secretive coven,which had remained so from the eyes of the church for years,ex-communicated him for his revealing of their ways.
i would not call the artist and musicians who balked at the churchs authoritarian ways as demonic philosophy but rather a true hearted rebellion against the stranglehold the church represented on many who may see things different.
not everyone is god-fearing and the church has never truly established a concise and singular explanation concerning original sin and even if it DID succeed in doing that,chirst died for the forgiveness of those sins.so the point is moot if you have accepted jesus as savior.
again i find videos such as these highly manipulative using imagery and cherry picked material to promote a narrative and for the layman this video may be seen as informative but it is more akin to propaganda meant to frighten those who may not know the facts.
be scared of mick jagger..booga booga!
"Do What You Want"..? (Exposing Satanism in Society)
crowley was a reknowned occultist and mystic.
he created his own tarot deck based on the egyptian god THOTH but he did not write the satanic bible,that was anton zandor levy a particularly self involved douchebag.
"do what thou whilt,may it harm none" is a wiccan edict drawn from the amalgamation of druidic,celtic and nordic theosophy and was adopted by crowley but was not created by him.wicca was brought to the states in 1952 by brent gardner from england and the secretive coven,which had remained so from the eyes of the church for years,ex-communicated him for his revealing of their ways.
i would not call the artist and musicians who balked at the churchs authoritarian ways as demonic philosophy but rather a true hearted rebellion against the stranglehold the church represented on many who may see things different.
not everyone is god-fearing and the church has never truly established a concise and singular explanation concerning original sin and even if it DID succeed in doing that,chirst died for the forgiveness of those sins.so the point is moot if you have accepted jesus as savior.
again i find videos such as these highly manipulative using imagery and cherry picked material to promote a narrative and for the layman this video may be seen as informative but it is more akin to propaganda meant to frighten those who may not know the facts.
be scared of mick jagger..booga booga!
Alan Turing - My Favourite Scientist
Touched.. by tragedy?
What, a fucking, understatement. Given a choice between imprisonment or hormonal treatment? As if they can.. cure the gay away. Touched by tragedy doesn't even begin to describe the kind of stupidity exhibited in this case, by society, no less.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Turing#Conviction_for_indecency
The real King's Speech - Rare footage/audio of George VI
No there hasn't. Queen Elizabeth II has ruled since 1952.>> ^Enzoblue:
Educate me. Has there been a king in England since I've been alive? (1964). I've only ever seen/heard the Queen. Waaaup with that?
Egyptian Revolution Montage - Take What's Yours [MUST SEE]
@GDGD well, I did actually google, but I used 'Egyptian Revolution'... as, well, you know, that's what this video was tagged as.
That gave me articles about the 1952 and 1919 ones, then also a link to this very video, and then some articles about it that all assumed you already knew what it was all about.
I did actually provide a LINK as to what I found when I looked at my local trusted news sources (ABC Australia is usually pretty good), but then I guess you just like pointing out things that you know that other people don't.
Everyone has different points of reference, no need to get snippy.
"Premakes" The Avengers (1952)
This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by ant. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.
"Premakes" The Avengers (1952)
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Premakes-The-Avengers-1952
NV Woman Sentenced to Life for Asking Minor for Sex
You know why the lawyer is crying; because the judge doesn't give a shit. The whole tone of that court is bullshit.
Now I'm going to use ad homimen against the quoted person below. Do you dislike the constitution; your comment would seem to put you in that category. This case is clear cut, the Judicial Branch in Nevada does not have the power to call that law what it is; bullshit. The balance of powers is not working, and it is clear in the judge’s tone of voice; "I wash my hands of this."
Read the 8th amendment.
Somehow I get the feeling that you would think the ultimatum imposed on Alan Turing was correct and immaculately moral. Read the following excerpt from Wikipedia. Turing’s ultimatum was chemical castration or imprisonment. Bear it in mind that this is the same era where Oppenheimer was persecuted for, what some would say, the same carelessness as Turing.
Your way of thinking is outdated, outmaneuvered and better suited for the middle ages; also misogyny doesn't suit you.
>> ^fjules:
She got sentenced for life because she refused to have her name on the sex offenders list. Basically, it's her own fault.
"wtf with the crying lawyer?"
Good reason why women can't be lawyers.
1952 Vintage film of atomic bomb tests involving U.S. Troops
"Kaiser Wilhelm, we hardly knew ye" and "The [re-classified] landing" and I'm here to tell you about...
>> ^djsunkid:
Hi, I'm Troy McClure, and you may remember me from such de-classified US Military Videos as...
gorillaman (Member Profile)
Yeah, the 'personhood' model and the cognitive machine model are each useful levels of detail for the same thing... the best one to use probably depends on what your application is.
I don't blame people, though, for holding views that I think have big costs for society... I think we're all in the same trap of limited human intelligence - them more so than us - and people will change their minds in the end.
Also, the libertarian in me says that society's lack of intelligence only has a cost on us if we let it (to some degree). Turing, for example, as much as I personally admire him for his genius, chose to take certain risks, and he lost the bet.
IMHO, it's reasonable to say a rationalist in his position wouldn't have been so careless with sexuality. I think we're often more empowered and capable of proactive behavior than we think we are, and viewing ourselves as victims is generally not necessary.
In reply to this comment by gorillaman:
You're better informed on the technology so I'm not going to argue your projections, but I wouldn't and haven't bet on them. It's funny, a basic assumption I've made in directing my life is that with a good diet and exercise, risk management and so on I'd make it to around 100, half that if I want to enjoy myself. If I thought I had a good chance (>50%) of surviving to the next millennium, say, that would drastically change almost every dimension of my life. So to that extent I sympathise with your attitude.
I disagree that calling a human a person is less valid than your input-output cognitive machine, which I absolutely accept to be an accurate description, itself no less valid than as a bundle of quarks and electrons, acting on even more fundamental mechanisms. One emerges from the next emerges from the next. Possessing a de facto consciousness I'm not too concerned with whether or why it really exists; illusory or real one seems to function as well as the other. So it's on that principle I interact with what I blindly assume are other similar minds.
In reply to this comment by chilaxe
2 neighbours fight over a flower (1952 oscar winner)
>> ^Farhad2000:
I seen this in film class.
Saw!
*art
I loved the way the sound was used.. and just brilliant overall. Well deserving of that Oscar.