Quantummushroom
After reading the email sent to Dag, I'd like to say a few things about it. Cuz its MY blog and I can. (and I didn't want to continue the siftquisition thread as it was done and decided)
I don't buy his smarmy childish attitude in the email.
He's as bothered as anyone would be; reading over 100 comments by other people who clearly dislike him. To pretend he doesn't care about that is to call him a robot.
Whether he is delighted or despairing, misses the point; he's a troll. I didn't think so before because I haven't been around here long enough but that email sure clinches it.
He doesn't answer the charge at all. He only says 'well now yall gotta clarify the rules - haha'
Chee thanks guy we really appreciate you FORCING us to spell out rules of conduct as if the whole intarwebby was nothin but a bunch of pre-schoolers who need to be told how to use the buddy system. That were reeel nice of you. We R Stoopit too! Heyuk heyuk. Ain't it grand how all the doofus liberals are all in a tizzy tryin to figure out how to deal with the likes of big boogeyman you? Har de har har. Woohoo you gots the nice people all a fluttered.
Gimme a break.
Maybe its cuz I spent too much time on the Hannity.com forums but frankly I'm fed up with so-called right-wing-nut-jobs treating me like dirt just because I espouse the ideas of tolerance and peace and love. TOlerance doesn't mean I let someone step all over me. Peace doesn't mean I let some jackass call me names. Love doesn't mean I let someone punch me repeatedly. I'm not a christian at all but I do believe in turning the other cheek when one can. Jesus wasn't talking about getting the shit kicked out of him, though, he was talking about turning away anger. Nothing dissapates anger like acquiescence and a peaceful attitude unless you're talking about a psychotic rage. THat's when its time to put yer dukes up and defend yourself.
Yeah, I'm talking about assholes who traipse into a perfectly decent place and throw their trash everywhere. I'm talking about assholes who see a bunch of very nice people and decide to purposefully take advantage of their tolerant nature. I'm talking about bullies.
And free speech or not, bullies need to be shown their place - the floor.
To my dying day I'll never understand why tolerant people think its their job to put up with assholes. Being tolerant doesn't mean being a sucker or a punching bag. There's a difference between "tolerant" and "doormat"
I once wrote a long post in my LJ about how I wasn't putting up with right-wing shitheads anymore. I had an epiphany and I'm glad.
9 Comments
"i'm not putting up with right wing shitheads anymore!"
is that hypocrisy i smell cooking? wtf does "right wing" mean anyway?
this is the internet. its strengths are its weaknesses.
weakness: communities get too big and don't work
strength: you can fuck off and start your own
ad infinitum.
I don't think there were nearly that many people that said they didn't like him. I certainly didn't. I don't agree with him the majority of the time. If there is someone who is teetering on an issue and there is a post about it, then that person gets a chance to see some very different perspectives, and occasionally an extreme one.
Plus, I like to think he makes my arguments look good.:)
From what I know about the guy, I think he was hurt. But despite it all, I hope he returns.
MINK: this is MY blog. you don't like it, don't read it. The statement was made in a general sense. I have been the subject of ridicule and goading and trolling plenty times by "right-wing" people taunting with "oooo you're so tawwwwlerant! ooo! you're just a libtard!" and I say
WTFever
and this is hypocracy how? being a "tolerant" person who is perfectly fine with other dissenting views does not mean I have to sit there and take it when someone wants to be an ass to me just because my views are different. Tolerate <>doormat. Learn it, lump it.
Mycroft: I don't think it was the number of people who said they couldn't stand him, it was the obvious strength of their feeling. I am not fond of him, as I said, but I don't hate him or anything. Just making a generalized statment based on what happened about how I won't "tolerate" trolls. I don't care which way their political leanings are. I've gotten into it with both left and right and regardless, I won't put up with trolling just because I believe in free speech and diversity. Such bullshit attacks are predicated on the attackers belief that "tolerant" somehow applies to being attacked; it doesn't in my book.
...and get the quote right MINK: "I once wrote a long post in my LJ about how I wasn't putting up with right-wing shitheads anymore."
it was a specific post about a specific incident that brought me to realize something overall.
>> ^MINK:
"i'm not putting up with right wing shitheads anymore!"
is that hypocrisy i smell cooking?
remove "right-wing". smell better? i sure think so.
i wouldn't care for the "left-wing" version of shroom any more, i assure you. and yes, they exist, and we've met them, and they're not helping either.
wtf does "right wing" mean anyway?
politically conservative.
primarily associated with the social, rather than the fiscal, sense.
social conservatism is, foremost, pro-choice. that is the largest plank, currently in the social conservative platform, in the states, today. and has been for most of my lifetime.
this does not, by any means, imply fiscal conservatism, however, which is a point many Libertarians here stress.
this is the internet. its strengths are its weaknesses.
weakness: communities get too big and don't work
strength: you can fuck off and start your own
ad infinitum.
^ check.
ps., smibbo.
this part?
To my dying day I'll never understand why tolerant people think its their job to put up with assholes. Being tolerant doesn't mean being a sucker or a punching bag. There's a difference between "tolerant" and "doormat".
is what this whole fucking mess was about, for me.
that shit could've happened to any one of you, and probably did. this time he picked me, because i was just another 'l00ny liberal' to him.
fuck that.
come to me with honest arguments? about something important? i'll fuckin' listen all night. srsly. i usually do exactly that.
think i'm your punching bag, or that we're on the playground? there's the door.
Inspired! m15m is right about losing the 'right wing' imo, although I've never personally seen a left winger as out of control as mushroom.
I think the big push to the right has left the right on the fringe and the left in the center, and of course you sound a helluva lot crazier when arguing from the fringe than from the center. Of course this centrist shift for the Dems has given them somewhat of an identity crisis, leaving them open to charges of spinelessness from both opponents and allies.
...oops, tangent, sorry.....
Anyway, it's clear from mushrooms comment to Dag that he has a major Christ complex. [2 weeks of not getting to vote on videos! = Nailed to a cross] So, a two week ban is probably the best thing he could have hoped for. I'm sure he is sopping up the victim pity over at FreeRepublic as we speak.
Personally I'm a lot more disappointed in a couple of other members than I ever was with QM. A Soviet Union comparison was tossed out there and a suspension is treated as if it were an outright ban and censorship or something, people who said no ban required and keep personality issues separate from the rest are lumped in with those who said just ban him for all of it and be done with it.
QM just did what he does, raised a bit of hell looking for a reaction. He can't disappoint or upset because that's just what he does. The rush to judgment between what I thought were friends though, that sucks. A small close community works better because everyone knows each other, Mink touched on it above with the comment "communities get too big and don't work" which is true. Yet in spite of that knowledge we insist on what, turning this place into another Youtube or something? The wild west with no accountability for excess?
The whole situation has been overblown. Being asked to behave in a civil manner is not censorship, this is not the Soviet Union and the comparison was silly, I've rarely seen a site that even tries to offer their members as much input as they do here. We can kill this site as quickly with misplaced idealism as anyone else can by outright aggression. I've used the web since it first developed when Usenet (text message) WAS the internet for the most part and have seen it happen too many times, good sites grow past the ability to self police through peer pressure and they either adapt to new rules and a larger user base or they lose what made them in the first place, wither away and die.
I do have a playlist called, "Dealing with Assholes"
innit I remember the shut-down-the-asshole-for-asshole's-sake vibe when I created it....
Feed him, he'll bite.....I predict, after the 2 week hiatus, he will no be able to confound his ego enough to come back strong, though he never was anyhow, no aspirations for community, no real concern for anyone's observations but his own....
If he wasn't rah rah about something that has not been twisted in knots, he'd be silly about something else, for the devil's advocate playboy that he aspires to be, and that not a very formidable one....
So....qm??? You pleased with the fouler taste you have managed to leave in most mouths here???.....or do you even care?
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.