Mary Matalin: Global warming a "largely unscientific hoax"

It warms my heart to see that Republican flacks can still call global warming a "largely unscientific hoax" and a "political concoction". By warming my heart, I mean it gives me acid reflux.
quantumushroomsays...

In lieu of religion, socialists needed a way to control the masses. After the Fail of "global cooling" in the 1970s, anthropogenic global warming became the latest fad, a one-size-fits-all way for geo-bureaucrats who produce nothing to control the doers.

Take a scientifically unproven consensus opinion, declare all debate "over", needlessly frighten the sheeple and start making fascist laws. They did it with tobacco, they're doing it with fat and now this crock of excrement. It's a dream come true for those trying to enslave humanity in the name of "for your own good".

Sorry to oversimplify, but the free market and its technology have lifted more people out of poverty around the world than any cabal of sanctimonious bureaucrats. I ask no one to believe blindly, but to consider who really stands to gain from endless bureaucracy. Hint: not you.

Issykittysays...

>> ^Fjnbk:
This woman is married to James Carville. I don't know why they haven't slaughtered each other already.


^They are both political hacks, so they probably understand eachother perfectly.

MycroftHomlzsays...

You know these people talk a big game... but once someone who knows what they are talking about wants to dance they act the wallflower. You have no idea how much it pisses me off.

MycroftHomlzsays...

Find me a single scientific paper, my bosonic fungi, that has not been retracted or corrected that validates your opinion.

Just one, mind you. Peer reviewed scientific paper, that is all I want.

Either every scientist is in on this grand liberal conspiracy, or you are just wrong. You need to accept what science tells you to be true. If you don't want to, then you need to come up with an experiment that explains the existing experimental data while elucidating another theory.

Look, this is how science is done.

At this point in the game, we need to seriously examine whether or not what we do will have an impact or not. Whether or not it is happening, whether or not man is the cause, is irrelevant to the issue at hand. We need to decide if we do something about it can we stop it, and if we don't how are we going to deal with the consequences.

quantumushroomsays...

Either every scientist is in on this grand liberal conspiracy, or you are just wrong.

You're presenting a false choice. NOT every scientist is "in on it", the ones being shunned and threatened with death, like Fred Singer, are pointing out, over and over, how the data doesn't support man-made global warming.

You need to accept what science tells you to be true. If you don't want to, then you need to come up with an experiment that explains the existing experimental data while elucidating another theory.

Science hasn't proved the case for man-made global warming. You know it, I know it.

Whether or not it is happening, whether or not man is the cause, is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

I'm afraid that's not the case, my friend, because the would-be tyrants are already and always on the march, looking for new ways to take power away from the people and bestow it upon themselves. The global warming hoaxers (until they have solid evidence, it is a hoax) want to rule whether or not what they claim is true.

We need to decide if we do something about it can we stop it, and if we don't how are we going to deal with the consequences.

The weather is likely too huge a system for puny humans to affect significantly on a global scale. Humankind already lives in every environment on earth. With the weather, The Dude abides. Enslaving people isn't going to change the weather.

MycroftHomlzsays...

One publication. Find one peer reviewed scientific article that has not been corrected and retracted.

Every scientist who has actually published data on this topic, supports that global warming is happening and most agree that it is due in some part to man.

Science does not take sides(Only in rare instances is this not true). Besides there is just too much data in support of global warming for it all to be wrong. Take a bit out of yourself and open up your mind.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More