Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Freddiew: Gamer Commute
>> ^sanderbos:
'...Thanks for Samsung for giving us Galaxy S II phones for filming...'
Holy cow, this was filmed with camera phones??!
Per YT description, it says the aerial shot was (I guess when he was on the car?).
"Building 7" Explained
>> ^Fade:
Funnily enough NIST did an incredibly good job of editing out the audio from a lot of the building collapse footage. Always at exactly the point one would expect to have heard explosions. Explosions that lots of witness claim to have seen and heard.
Those "explosions" are the sounds of the towers collapsing. You'd kinda expect 100+ stories of building to make a lot of noise as it comes down. Go watch some real demolition videos if you want to hear what a real demo actually sounds like.
Also, a lot of what so-called 9/11 "truthers" point to as video evidence of explosions--the ejected smoke/air as the tower collapses--occurs after the tower has started collapsing. This is the opposite of the way normal demolitions work: explosions go off, then building comes down (usually starting at the bottom). The WTC towers collapsed from the top down; again opposite a normal demo.
And all of this still begs the question:
1) How would the towers be rigged in the first place, keeping in mind that rigging 250+ collective stories worth of skyscraper is no simple task?
And, 2) Why even bother rigging them at all since if this was a so-called "false flag" event, this just uncessarily complicates the whole thing by a factor of 100?
Of course, if you want to keep living in a Tom Clancy-esque spy thriller novel, all of this is irrelevant.
"Building 7" Explained
So are Bigfoot, Nessie and the Roswell aliens...
>> ^rougy:
Whoever attacked America on 9/11 is still out there
"Building 7" Explained
WTC 4, 5 and 6 were a lot shorter though. WTC 4 and 5 are only 9 stories tall (and WTC 4 was pretty much destroyed by the debris), and WTC 6 was only 8 stories tall. I don't know if that qualifies them as "skyscrapers". In contrast, WTC 7 was 47 stories tall. Do you know of any other 40+ story buildings initially damaged from debris/collision/etc followed by intense fire for many hours that remained standing?
The onther thing that makes absolutely no sense--aside from the fact that secretly rigging buildings like WTC 1,2, and 4 would be a logistical nightmare--is why WTC 7 would be rigged at all. There is no logical sense to rig it to blow so many hours after the fact. Especially that if by some miracle it wasn't damanged in the WTC 1&2 collapse, what then? Just arbitrarily bring it down?
No, the whole "let's blow up the buildings" argument is just dumb on so many levels it hurts my head to even think about.
>> ^marbles:
Let me refer you to my previous comment:
http://videosift.com/video/Building-7-Explained#comment-1290794
"Building 7" Explained
>> ^Fade:
Because it's simple physics that no steel skyscraper has ever collapsed from, before and since.
And were those other skyscrapers also damaged after being showered in debris from an adjacent building collapse? No? Okay, then.
"Building 7" Explained
The thing I find bizarre about the whole "controlled explosive" conspiracy theory wackiness (and yes, it's fucking retarded theory and if you believe it you were probably dropped on your head as a child)... is that some 50,000 people works in the towers and yet apparently nobody noticed they were being wired to be blowed up.
Key-rist...
"Atheism destroyed with one question" (sic)
I'm just going to assume this is parody. Because it's too stupid to be anything but.
Man Hit by Train: Graphic
>> ^Fusionaut:
FAKE!!
PHOTOSHOPPED!
Proficient Shaking Ability Displayed at Gas Station
>> ^honkeytonk73:
That explains the earthquake...
Butt-quake?
Rick Santorum Argues With Student Over Gay Marriage
The best thing Santorum could do for his campaign is STFU. OTOH, it's highly entertaining for the interwebs when he doesn't.
Bill Nye Explaining Science on Fox is "Confusing Viewers"
Bill Nye said "sex" on Fox. He won't be invited back.
If you are trying to exit the highway, at least look around!
>> ^Payback:
Actually, passing people that quickly to the right is BEGGING for an accident. I call 1/2sies on camera car.
Agreed, he seems to be the fastest driver on the road and doing that in the far right lane is dangerous. That said, the SUV should have waited and done a shoulder check rather than trying to switch 2 lanes in one shot. I'd call 1/4 fault to the camera driver, 3/4 to the SUV.
Hell have no fury like nerds catching a cheater
Photoshopped! I mean, fake. Also, lame music. Yeah, no upvote.
Preacher Manipulates Kids into Donating Money
God, Easy but not cheap
Incredible Portal Fan Film
Oh hell yes awesome