If you wanna put it back, I won't fight. Channel reassignment is something I do out of compulsion, not out of caring about channels. I think the channels are mostly useless, actually.
In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
But it seems to be fairly clear that this video has essentially been set up and intended to portray Shell in a comedic way. It might not advertise a product but in a way it's brand (anti)advertisement. With it's false premise, unusual incident and insinuations of being the real deal, it also possesses traits usually attributed to (intended) viral videos.


In reply to this comment by messenger:
*nochannel

keeping:
*eco

adding:
*comedy

losing:
-viral (channel is for viral advertising only, not any video that happens to go viral)

Thanks for the note, it should be fixed now.
In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
*dead, I think.

Thank you elefantly!
In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
*promote

Happy anniversary! Today marks year number 5 since you first became a Sifter and the community is better for having you. Thanks for your contributions!

Thanks for the *promo!
In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
*promote

Fixed.

I have watched this several times and I still can't see how he got through the first big mess.


In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
*dead

Congratulations! Your dedication to keeping videos updated with their correct lengths has earned you your "Time Keeper" Level 1 Badge!

From a comment search, you have 38 of them (including one that wasn't in the comment below) and zifnab (timekeeper lev 1) has 76 (he can't be far off lev 2 though). Although the exact number required isn't publicised, 221 will get you to lev 3.
>> ^lucky760:

More likely the latter. Don't give up now!
In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
Hey Lucky, Siftbot is not acknowledging my repeated use of the length-command, and frankly I think a timekeeper-badge should have been well earned by now. Is there something a miss, or is the requirement for the badge simply outrageously high?

More likely the latter. Don't give up now!

In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
Hey Lucky, Siftbot is not acknowledging my repeated use of the *length-command, and frankly I think a timekeeper-badge should have been well earned by now. Is there something a miss, or is the requirement for the badge simply outrageously high?

Thanks so much for the promote, although I guess it wasn't mine anyway. Hate it when that happens!

In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
*promote

Wooooot! Kiitos!

In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
Onneksi olkoon!

Thanks for the promote.

In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
Wow, *promote!

http://videosift.com/video/Busted-1

It passed 100. No more love.

When it passes 100, it'll get no love from me!

In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
Wow, you're really passionate about cleavage I guess?

In reply to this comment by blankfist:
*doublepromote for the last LAST time!

Well, from what we see anyway. The driver of the car gets up and picks up his clearly also alive child. At the end of the clip, you can see the white minibus, starts to drive off again briefly.

But anyway, snuff usually means a graphic video resulting in watching the actual death of a person. We don't see anybody die with our own eyes in this video, and I also believe them all to be alive at the end of the video IMHO.

In reply to this comment by Norsuelefantti:
How do you know that?

In reply to this comment by Hybrid:
Snuff requires death. Nobody died in this video.>> ^Norsuelefantti:

Snuff?