Thanks!

Thanks for the promote!

Thanks for the quality!

Thanks for the promote quality!

I'm still not seeing the difference. Everything you said about SB equally applies to Lantern except for the details of the problem (like it being non-scientific, and so forth).

"Allowing" opinions like SBs also makes it possible to begin to understand the "wrong" side of the argument. I've sharpened these atheist claws considerably speaking with SB.

I don't remember SB attacking anyone. Can you link to an example?

messenger jokingly says...

That and the grey colour of the message mean that I'd slicked the "sarcasm" button before posting it.

I appreciate the quality.
In reply to this comment by Sagemind:
*Quality

Thanks for the promote!
In reply to this comment by JiggaJonson:
*promote

"Look, we're just not gonna tell you. Stop askin, okay?"

I'm moving this to your profile or else the troll wins.

I see what you're getting at, and it's arguable that I came on too strong, but I think you're missing that we generally know the difference between a different opinion from ours and trolling. bk33 can criticize and vent his vitriolic bile as much as any of us (I'm including myself in that category), and I don't think there's anybody here who has a problem with that. There aren't many vocal conservatives on the Sift, but there are some (Chilaxe comes to mind), and as long as they know how to carry on a discussion, there's little issue. Tempers flare, of course, but nobody seriously thinks they're trolling, just wrong, and that's great. But bk33 contributes nothing. And I don't mean he contributes nothing to my side of the argument -- I mean he leaves the place measurably worse than when he found it.

About CrushBug's comment. He's just venting. He didn't make any claims at all, let alone unsubstantiated ones, unless you mean about renaming The Government of Canada to "The Harper Government", which Harper has actually really done. Google it. So I think you're not seeing the qualitative difference between CrushBug's comments and bk33's.

Real mobs kill people. We just happen to outnumber him. We can't hurt or even remotely silence him.

In reply to this comment by frosty:
Sometimes there is such intolerance of opposition in opinion here at the Sift. When your typical liberal Sifter decries the greed of the private sector, vilifies "big business" and slams Fox News, it is hailed throughout the ranks as a battle cry, but when bobknight33 suggests the inefficiency of government-controlled industry and criticizes MSNBC, he is bombarded by the mob with accusations of naivety, not substantiating his remarks and being a "troll." For instance, take a post like CrushBug's -- "Fucking Harper. I am glad they have spent the time and money to change the name of the gov't to "The Harper Government" so once this horrible aberration of politics is voted out we can easily identify and kill this kind of evil bullshit." This is the quintessence of unsubstantiated, ad hominem attack. Yet it is met with resounding approval and hardy back slaps aplenty, buoyed up by the inertia of the throng.

Thanks dude!In reply to this comment by Fusionaut:
*promote for all of our "freedoms" disappearing

Thanks for the promote!
In reply to this comment by davidraine:
*promote

Thanks!
In reply to this comment by marinara:
*quality

Thanks and thanks!
In reply to this comment by marinara:
*quality*promote

Thanks for the quality.
In reply to this comment by arvana:
*quality

Another question then: How do you find videos that are dead if they're not already marked? Browse from the oldest and keep a bookmark of your progress? Or maybe you do it the other way and go around killing YT videos that are embedded here.
In reply to this comment by jonny:
except when I'm on a dead spree