Post has been Discarded

sweet little cat

summary redacted
chingalerasays...

Hey folks, keep the ban-hammers in yer holsters, I pm'd this user with details, let's let her ditch her own video-Told her I'd re-submit it for her, after.

siftbotsays...

cemil2000 has been nominated for banination by chicchorea. This may be due to abuse or violations of the posting guidelines. If this nomination is seconded, the account will be permanently disabled.

eric3579says...

Did you happen to read @chingalera post above. He seems to be on top of taking care of this one.

It's MORE important to let people correct their ways and become new members, if they want to, rather then banning them. IMO we should be banning people as a last resort not a first one. Having to many sifters is not one of the sifts problems currently.

Don't get me wrong , I personally appreciate you being on top of sifters who sift their own videos. I just think there are times to cut potential new members some slack, and this would be one of those cases.

chicchoreasays...

...perhaps.

The poster's actions and that of others' will dictate.

Otherwise....

eric3579said:

Did you happen to read @chingalera post above. He seems to be on top of taking care of this one.

It's MORE important to let people correct their ways and become new members, if they want to, rather then banning them. IMO we should be banning people as a last resort not a first one. Having to many sifters is not one of the sifts problems currently.

Don't get me wrong , I personally appreciate you being on top of sifters who sift their own videos. I just think there are times to cut potential new members some slack, and this would be one of those cases.

chicchoreasays...

Notwithstanding your impassioned and cogent plea, I withheld this comment not wishing to unduly influence the poster in question.

Fact of the matter is that I have endeavored as above in a number of such situations and the percentage of those who chose to become participatory and productive Sifters is very low.

Further, this poster, while feigning ignorance and disbelief in fact did both change their nom de self link and the title of the video...NOT the actions of an innocent.

Therefore...clickclickBANG...or...I could be wrong. In either case both the Sift and the self linker will survive.

eric3579said:

Did you happen to read @chingalera post above. He seems to be on top of taking care of this one.

It's MORE important to let people correct their ways and become new members, if they want to, rather then banning them. IMO we should be banning people as a last resort not a first one. Having to many sifters is not one of the sifts problems currently.

Don't get me wrong , I personally appreciate you being on top of sifters who sift their own videos. I just think there are times to cut potential new members some slack, and this would be one of those cases.

chingalerasays...

I checked my pm, no response, they either bailed and could give a damn or chicchoreas' correct in assuming a poser (trust the same's impeccable observations thus far)-Feel free to do with the account as the mood strikes, I'm gonna play the Pontious Pilate card now that the devil's advocateur has had 12 hours or so...

chingalerasays...

Oh, and it's more excitement than one can handle now isn't it people??!!

Time to surf those fluid dynamics extracts I've been creaming to tear into....

siftbotsays...

cemil2000 has been seconded for banination by eric3579. This account will now be disabled. If you would like to appeal this banination, cemil2000, you may contact the administrators.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More