43 views
40:50 L
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
7 Comments
kir_mokumthis woman is a nutter.
enochlol whaaa?
care to explain that a tad further?
or should we just take your drive-by observations as fact?
this woman is a nutter.
TrancecoachTranscript.
kir_mokumwhat is there to explain? i think she has some fucked up views on the world. i mean "Men's Rights Sensation" is enough evidence of that.
lol whaaa?
care to explain that a tad further?
or should we just take your drive-by observations as fact?
enochhmmmm...i see.
i took the description directly from the youtube page of the canadian association for equality.i really have know idea if she is actually a sensation but her lecture was pretty non-controversial.she was simply comparing the terms toxic masculine and toxic femininity by using historical examples.
she really didn't inject her own opinion or views.she just was offering differentiating comparisons by way of historical examples.
so i was simply,and quite sincerely,curious your take on her lecture,but i have a sneaking suspicion that you didnt actually watch this lecture and instead made a knee-jerk reactionary based solely on the description.
what is there to explain? i think she has some fucked up views on the world. i mean "Men's Rights Sensation" is enough evidence of that.
siftbotMoving this video to enoch's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.
kir_mokumi didn't because i can't stand hearing her talk.
hmmmm...i see.
i took the description directly from the youtube page of the canadian association for equality.i really have know idea if she is actually a sensation but her lecture was pretty non-controversial.she was simply comparing the terms toxic masculine and toxic femininity by using historical examples.
she really didn't inject her own opinion or views.she just was offering differentiating comparisons by way of historical examples.
so i was simply,and quite sincerely,curious your take on her lecture,but i have a sneaking suspicion that you didnt actually watch this lecture and instead made a knee-jerk reactionary based solely on the description.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.