I'm not sure I have the stomach to see it. (The movie, I mean..)

Some of my suggestions to the director to answer that stupid "please justify for my benefit why you made this movie?"

1. Just to piss you off... yes you personally.
2. Fuck off (note this is not a one word answer as the reporter specifically tells him not to give).
3. Because your mom gave me the suggestion.

fucking retarded journalist. know your place.

the last person he needs to justify anything to is you. crawl back to your hole and slip the mary poppins dvd back in.

Wow, just from the snippets of shots I've seen from this and now the trailer on IMDB I'm very curious to see this movie. Talking in terms of just the shots, as in purely the images, it has that David Fincher like look to it (SE7EN is still among my favorite movies... yes, I like happy movies too).

And why can't fiction just be fiction these days? Even if a director or writer is trying to sneak in some message, it doesn't mean you can't just appreciate a movie as purely a story. That -is- all it is after all. If it has any more power over you then that, it's because you gave that power to the movie.

Dunno, maybe I'll feel different after I've seen this, but that's my approach to going into a movie. Treat it like curling up with a new book.

so,
mel gibson can drop a giant turd of a movie,where we were subjected to almost no story,but over an hour of incredibly detailed brutalization,but that was about christ....and mel made gazillions.the film was praised as being so inspiring and spiritual...
no..it wasnt.it was glorified torture wrapped in religious dogma.
you can dress up a turd in barbie clothes..its still a turd.
now this man brings a film about a character that the majority of christians are absolutely fascinated about.(revelations is the NUMBER ONE discussed biblical text.)
what exactly did these people think the movie was going to be like?
the pure hackery of those "left behind" books?how can you go to a movie titled "antichrist" and expect to not see a fairly dark movie?
and then have the audacity to feign indignation?offense?
good! maybe they needed to be offended...
its about the ANTICHRIST,not bunnies prancing with kitty cats,
for the love of everything stupid!
i for one cant WAIT to see this now!

^ Agreed.

The Director made the film:- A) to simply entertain the audience, or B)to try, subliminally, to re-establish belief in God in an increasingly Deist/Atheist western world. After all, if you have the existance of an Anti-Christ, the brainwashed Theists would argue, then Christ must also exist. I hope he made the film simply to entertain and, as such, i look forward to seeing it.
As for the reporter; maybe the film offended his religious beliefs, but whatever the cause of his unprofessional outburst, i would suggest he stops trying to be an impartial reporter, and becomes a prosecutiing attorney instead..

^there's a movie about bunnies prancing with kitty cats?

*promote

Self promoting this video back to the front page; last published Wednesday, May 27th, 2009 3:25pm PDT - promote requested by original submitter griefer_queafer.

Magical evil dudes under the ground are REAL! LOL

You have all the relgio-zealots going nuts, as they actually believe in this shit. Sure it makes great entertainment in a dark fairy tale sense.. but they fucking think demons and the like are REAL.

Now who is the fucked up? The fairytale storyteller, or the zealot who thinks magical beings live underground and exist solely to torment us and scare us into subservience under a magical invisible sky god.

^

say what, money?