Sorry Mix - this embodies everything that's wrong with US firearms policy (in my opinion).

uhhh..the violence tag being wholly subjective, let's just hope barney here knows himself, and his child,and is not just playing "best friend" with his first son. The gun is a tool, not a yahoo fun toy that makes noise and go "BANG" and that kid is too young to know the difference....my take is Dad's fuckin' up.

God that "Kung Fu" baby still kills me!!! I'm makin' him my new sensei screen-saver!

I want to state unequicocally that by posting this video I am NOT CONDONING this behavior at all.

Any sane group of folks calling themselves a country, knowing that there is the possiblity that some other In-sane type may procure illegally or otherwise a firearm, should give its citizenry the same opportunity, and not leave them out in the cold.

Fact: There are guns in the world
Fact: Some people use guns for badness
Fact: Not all people are irresponsible fucks with guns who have ill-will and tissue damage in mind when they pick one up.
So...does it not follow that a reasonable response to the situation be to make legal,a status quo with the idea of self-preservation in mind?

Anti gun folks are ideallistic, dreamers, who wish for a secret soft and pretty place, aplace that never heard of a gun.
When that Paradigm presents itself, I'll be the first in line to beat mine into plowshares....untill then, I'll keep my plowshares, and my guns, oiled and ready.

It's not the guns I mind choggie. It's teaching a two year old how to use one.

That guy should be shot.

totally wrong to let a baby shoot a gun. He can't appreciate what it is. also, what about the danger in the gun malfunctioning? This redneck thinks he's being responsible too.

We are on the same page there mix-

Title changed from "Baby Learns to Shoot" to "Stupidest Parents in the world: Baby Learns to Shoot"

I don't get it, when a post like this is voted against, is it based on the merit of the viddy, the dialogue it encites, or just the viceral response by the, "anti gun for any reason whatsoever", dreamers I was talking about earlier??? Cause to take this hayseed idiot out the queue just cause you think it horrible to show this idiot with his baby, is cencorship plain and simple. Like I said before...Those videos of all the righteous folks beheaddings should be posted here, and on all television stations everynight worldwide, to remind the planet daily that we fucked up giving the backward people of the Middle East, the instruments of war. ..and swampgirl, you're right on with that statement.

Thanks, choggie, and I agree.

I voted against this vid because I don't like it. Everything about it makes me feel ill.
Doesn't get simpler.

Discarded due to negative votes by members

So no one else should see it? Sometimes the most painful things to watch are the ones people should see the most.

I see your point mlx but the fact is, it's a horrible clip. I don't think many people consider the wider implications of banishing a video to the depths of VideoSift before they click the button.

Yeeeee-HAW!
Alright, Mable, now let's go whittle some and drink a little moonshine!
Dern tootin'!

*save

Saving this video from queue deletion, sending it to the top of the queue for one more try. Originally submitted on Saturday 21st October 2006 (save called by gold star member James Roe)

I agree that people should see stuff like this.

Hey man, whittlin's what kept uncle Jed young at heart and strappin'!

Thanks James.

OK, I'll fess up. I'm a librarian. Alot of what we do is preserve the First Amendment, or Free Speech. To us that translates to Intellectual Freedom. I guess that colors alot of what I post here...

In the same vein: if you downvote something because of a knee-jerk reaction to it's content perhaps you should consider that the video is noteworthy because it can inspire you to do something about it.

at least he remembered to use protectors on his son's young ears. *thumbs up*