Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
8 Comments
dmacsays...Yeah Freeman Dyson is the man. So imagine each one of those explosions is a low yield nuclear payload being shot out the back of the spacecraft at regular intervals with the shockwave bouncing off a well designed aluminum pusher plate.
Would have been an amazing launch to witness.
NetRunner*spacy
siftbotAdding video to channels (Spacy) - requested by NetRunner.
RaigenUnfortunately, according to their original documents, no one would've been able to witness the launches within a few hundred(?) miles of the launch site. Or else they would suffer permanent blindness and other physiological side effects.
I'm actually quite pleased this project was never taken to a real testing phase, it just seems far too dangerous, and just not elegant enough for practical use. In stead of shooting an apple off someone's head with an arrow, they're using, well, a nuclear bomb.
cybrbeastThey are only small nuclear bombs, so I doubt the viewing distance is hundreds of miles. Many people looked at the nuclear tests of history from much closer ranges. Goggles are probably advised. The launch pad would also be made from metal to greatly reduce nuclear fallout and special nuclear bombs would reduce fallout even more. Most nuclear fallout comes from the irradiated earth that spews out from a nuclear blast.
This project is one of the only feasible current options of reaching other stars. It can reach 0.1c meaning a trip of slightly more than 40 years to our nearest star.
eric3579*dead
siftbotThis published video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by eric3579.
srdFixed with a LiveLeak version.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.