Your video works and the original no longer works.

http://www.videosift.com/story.php?id=1191&where=index

The old has the following YouTube statement:

"This is a private video. If you have been sent this video, please make sure you accept the sender's friend request."

I personally think we should fix the orig, and call this a dupe.

Is deathcow still checking comments?

Tags changed from "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuksad-jj" to "parkour" by gold star member darksun.

Congratulations! The minimum votes to graduate to full member status have been received. Probation member has been promoted to full-fledged member.

Tags changed from "parkour" to "parkour, crazy, gymnastics, urban ninja" by gold star member joedirt.

it wont let me fix my video because of this video

*blog --> anyone want to do some editting?

Original video is still alive but has dead link. Should original video be fixed (which it cannot because of duplicate URLs) Or does new video stay because no one fixed the older broken video in time? What if the olcder post had been discarded? (Can it be saved and replaced with working video) What is the VS ruling? Fix older original submissions, or just get working videos into queues?

So, technically, this should be discarded and then deathcow can fix his video(?) Judges?

WOw will I revert back to a tarnished color star from my shiny silver? I dont think I could take that kind of rejection. (starts whistling manically) I need to clean my rifle.

Sending this video to the blog for discussion (sent by gold star member joedirt)

Joedirt: That's a good point. Perhaps there should be a 30 day rule to allow time for a person to go back and fix a dead or changed link.

Imagine if a link has 100+ votes but is no longer available at point A (but is available at point B). If after a certain time it's still dead, then isn't it fair game for the new poster? Perhaps we can notify the person that their link is dead by email (or push of a button)... a courtesy email from siftbot the same way SB emails us about comments.

What do you guys think?

Either that, or a *merge command, discussed earlier... ehm, what does Darth Vader have to say about this?
http://www.videosift.com/story.php?id=5670&where=index

*dead

*return

Returning this video from Sift Talk - return requested by gorgonheap.

now *dead

Only published videos may be flagged dead - ignoring dead request by gorgonheap.

Discarding this video. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 4 days.