Neil Tyson on What NASA Means to America's Future

Neil deGrasse Tyson makes a pretty damned compelling argument for keeping NASA afloat.
RadHazGsays...

He's just a college student really. He may be stuffy but he asked decent question imo. Besides which it led to a spectacular answer. Still, I understand the point, and the guy did look a little uncomfortable.

GeeSussFreeKsays...

NASA is a cold war relic created to one up the Russians who one uped us. I have several friends that work with NASA (they employee an army of contractors), so I am close to the issue on wanting them to stay around in current form so they keep their jobs. BUUUTTT (and you knew it was coming), rockets are hardly buses or trains. It is hardly the backbone of infrastructure like he was referencing. Rockets, and space in general are a bold and interesting place for science to be conducted, but shouldn't be forced. If people are convinced by his argument (and I am) I would give hundreds of dollars to a commercial, benevolent space organization. If the entity that was NASA went "public", I know I would invest it its future, more than I am currently forced to.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More