*promote

Self promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Monday, December 29th, 2008 2:49am PST - promote requested by original submitter Constitutional_Patriot.

I only listened to the first few, but if that's the best "smoking guns" they could find, then either they're not looking very hard, or that's the most accurate 10,000 page scientific document ever produced.

A document that size, with that many people working on it for that long, with such messy source data, is bound to have all sorts of problems and - despite not (edit: somehow missed the "not" before) believing any of the "truther" garbage - I am shocked they couldn't find more interesting flaws.

you didn't think those flaws were interesting? Hmmm...me thinks perhaps your brain has atrophied.

>> ^jmzero:
I only listened to the first few, but if that's the best "smoking guns" they could find, then either they're not looking very hard, or that's the most accurate 10,000 page scientific document ever produced.
A document that size, with that many people working on it for that long, with such messy source data, is bound to have all sorts of problems and - despite not (edit: somehow missed the "not" before) believing any of the "truther" garbage - I am shocked they couldn't find more interesting flaws.



Who said this is a complete analysis? This is someone pointing out a few of the discrepancies. I'm sure there will be more to come.. but hey.. you don't want to see it anyways.. so I suggest you ignore this altogether jmzero... nothing to see here.. move along please.

This isn't garbage at all.

Our country was attacked on 9/11, and Al Qaeda had nothing to do with it.

I don't think how angry the speaker sounds will help him get people to listen to what he has to say, but he does seem to have some valid points.

Made me think of this: http://www.videosift.com/video/Revised-Analysis-of-Downward-Acceleration-of-WTC-7

This isn't garbage at all.

Our country was attacked on 9/11, and Al Qaeda had nothing to do with it.

OK, who did it? Is there evidence to back up that assertion? Really? Does that evidence actually come together to form a logical story that isn't self-contradictory and doesn't rely on motivations that would require hundreds of crazy, inconsistent people involved and a massive conspiracy of silence? All I ever see are lists of "unanswered questions" - exactly the kind of runny crap that moon-landing hoaxers bring up.

The other tactic used heavily here is changing the subject. It doesn't matter how many of the old questions were answered in the report - they were never the real questions. Now the real question is why don't they talk more about their shadow-based dating. THAT'S SO VERY UNSCIENTIFIC. THESE SO-CALLED ENGINEERS NEED TO RESIGN! RESIGN THEMSELVES TO A LIFE OF PRISON FOREVER THAT IS!

Look, when your anti-American nutball conspiracy is so - I'm just going to say it - stupid that Noam Chomsky won't even placate its believers, won't even hedge his bets on whether it has merit, then you know you're out to lunch.

And don't bother replying (to me anyway). I have all your comments on ignore, and will forever. You may think this makes me a coward. Feel free to post about that to people who don't have you on ignore. However, I can say with confidence that you will never have anything interesting to say, ever, in your miserable, stupid life - so I don't think I'll miss anything.

^ coward

WOW Jmzero, you are a cock!

*discard

Discarding this post - discard requested by original submitter Constitutional_Patriot.