Kymatica

submitted by EndAll
1 decade 5 years 5 months 3 weeks ago
by Ben Stewart

21 Comments

westysays...

This is pretty shitty

the video is composed and presented as a factual to be taken seriously video yet the content is very poorly stitched together with no real scientific backing or reference.

This guy also uses copleaty non descriptive language that is easily open to interpretation.

if you have some philosophical ideas that are not based in science you should not present them as scientific fact or fact, you should eathor present them as philosophical ideas and draw atentoin to that or present it as a fictional exsploratoin which contains your philosophies.

of course if you have a philosphy/idea that you feal can be largely proven by science clearly reference and show how and what has made you come to your conclusion , simply stating your conclusion is a pretty shitty way to try and make people believe what you are saying.



~Whats really stupid is that i would probably be open to some of the concepts within this but its unbelievably pore presentation make the actual message incredibly inaccessible for rational evaluation.

~just to be clear visually it looked quite nice, by presentation i mean the actual data within not imaginary.

srdsays...

For some reason I'd have expected to see a fact-based program if it's called a "documentary".

Kind of disturbing to see the people who are so against "teaching to controversy" flocking around this production that lays on the mysticism so thick that I had to turn off after 3 minutes.

enochsays...

>> ^NordlichReiter:
This is not science. Interesting as it is.
I have never heard of a science called Astropsychology or whatever.
I've heard of Metaphysics
Science does not deal with ideas or emotion. It deals with observation and then subsequent experimentation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience


and psychology is a science by your definition?
really?
while i agree with you this is more metaphysics than anything ,it does, in the beginning, deal with the nature of consciousness.something that psychology STILL has not been able to properly define.
now i am not saying that psychology has not brought some great advances to the table but i wont call it a science just like i wont call a chiropractor a doctor.this documentary was simply making the statement that psychology was born from the mystery schools and historically that is correct.who WERE the first scientists?
priests for the church and they attended these mystery schools.shrouded in secrecy and were the few who were literate in that age.that is another discussion though.

please understand my friend that i am not by my words defending every minutae that is proposed in this film,just that i found it interesting and some things i agree with,other things i cannot due to lack of proof and/or a reasonable explaination.
but ask yourself these simple yet profoundly complicated questions:
who ARE you?
what IS consciousness?
if you reflect on these questions truthfully and openly you may start to realize why i found this film...interesting.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments

 
Create New Playlist
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More