Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
10 Comments
gwiz665Balls to the walls, I'm gonna love this. *quality
siftbotBoosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by gwiz665.
mintbbbThanks for the quality!
MarineGunrockI couldn't imagine an actor better suited for that role. He perfectly represents everything I imagined when reading the books.
hpqpAlan Rickman has one of the best cinema voices evar (not to mention his excellent acting).
mintbbbI saw the first movie before I read any of the books, and since then I have been a Snape fan! No matter if he ends up being evil or good, Snape is the man! My hat's off to Alan Rickman!
SlipperyPeteERODELBMUD SLLIK EPANS
Mikus_AureliusI thought the films got Snape dead wrong. They have him vaguely menacing and cryptic. He doesn't even really act like an authority figure.
In the books he's openly sarcastic, insulting, and threatening. He's wickedly intelligent and disdainful of those who aren't.
Probably the main place the films fail for me is not in plot simplifications or ill-conceived action sequences, but the fact that characters like Snape and Dumbledore are warped beyond recognition.
spoco2*viral
Can I just mention how much I hate that the US version of the first film got the retarded title of '...Sorcerer's Stone' instead of '..Philosopher's Stone'?
The Philosopher's Stone is a thing of legend and intrigue, the Sorcerer's Stone just sounds ridiculous and cheap.
To rename the book because of fears of parent's/kids not wanting a book with 'philosopher' in the title, and not knowing of the legend is so pandering, so thinking the worst of the American public. I hate it.
siftbotAdding video to channels (Viral) - requested by spoco2.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.