This is strange. Why didnt they tell us about a secondary attack along with the planes?

The fire fighters say there is a bomb in the building, come on.

How does this happen, and they hide this. This is proof that they are hiding things from us about the tragedy.

Before you attribute the plane to causeing the explosions think about how does a plane up there, cause explosions down there?

However I do like to see both sides of this story, people argue its a conspiracy and people who argue against it, through this discourse we may at some point a long time from now find some common ground.

If I can I will post a video of someone that disagrees with the conspirators.

first

Yeah, weird. I have come to think that they are transformers exploding...
http://www.youtube.com/results?q=transformer+exploding&search_type=
Each of those buildings had a good sized town's electrical supply in them. Lots of transformers and they go off just like that when their electrolytes overheat.

>> ^NordlichReiter:
Before you attribute the plane to causeing the explosions think about how does a plane up there, cause explosions down there?


All I see in this vid are images taken after the towers have fallen. I see nothing in here showing secondary explosions actually taking down the towers. And that first supposed explosion shown sounds suspiciously like part of the tower landing on the street (they're doing demolition work near my house and that's exactly what it sounds like when they toss steel girders off the third floor down into the main yard--you can hear the boom for miles). One of the reporters even says it "sounds like" explosions but clearly is referring to the sound made by the collapsing pieces of the towers.

But even assuming that actual explosions were taking place, I don't think it's hard to find evidence that several gas lines were cut after the collapses. Also, fires were burning underground for months after the collapse of the towers. The whole attack site was a toxic disaster with a mix of hazardous chemicals piled on top of each other. I don't think it takes that much of a logical stretch to consider that when you mix toxic chemicals with fire you're going to get explosions.

Structrual engineering - if youve never even had a look at what gos into skyscrapers, then perhaps you should consider not jumping to conspiracy conclusions so quickly.

please enlighten us all concerning structural engineering charliem, we'd love to read...no jumpers, they make a mess of things....

*long

This video has been flagged as being at least 10 minutes in length - declared long by Zonbie.

I don't believe in conspiracy, i believe in right or wrong.

Believe this: the administration has failed to honor Inteligence that stated "Binladen determined to attack in united states"

Then again this administration attacked Iraq for bad intelligence on weapons of mass destruction, which were never found.

In both cases the administration was wrong.

What does it mean when fire personnel say "There is a bomb in the building?"

>> ^SDGundamX:
>> ^NordlichReiter:
Before you attribute the plane to causeing the explosions think about how does a plane up there, cause explosions down there?

All I see in this vid are images taken after the towers have fallen. I see nothing in here showing secondary explosions actually taking down the towers. And that first supposed explosion shown sounds suspiciously like part of the tower landing on the street (they're doing demolition work near my house and that's exactly what it sounds like when they toss steel girders off the third floor down into the main yard--you can hear the boom for miles). One of the reporters even says it "sounds like" explosions but clearly is referring to the sound made by the collapsing pieces of the towers.
But even assuming that actual explosions were taking place, I don't think it's hard to find evidence that several gas lines were cut after the collapses. Also, fires were burning underground for months after the collapse of the towers. The whole attack site was a toxic disaster with a mix of hazardous chemicals piled on top of each other. I don't think it takes that much of a logical stretch to consider that when you mix toxic chemicals with fire you're going to get explosions.

*discard

Discarding this post - discard requested by original submitter NordlichReiter.