By the way, the math and statistics are very sound. If you aren't a faith-based math believer, then you cannot believe Bush won Ohio in 2004.

Here's the deal, the official story is somehow Bush voters were too afraid to answer exit polls honestly or refused to answer. That is what the pollster consortium maintains is required to "fudge" the polling data to make it match the real precinct results.

Now a couple of fun facts if you believe the official story. Bush voters only in certain precincts responded to exit polls this way. Where Bush got majority of vote, these precincts had over representation of Bush voters lining up for the exit poll (and vice versa). Ok, I could maybe see how you might fall for this (though even in repressive regimes where we send election monitors, they don't need to fudge the exit polls).

(Think about that for a moment.. exit polls have always been used to detect fraud in every country for decades. Elections have been over turned from international election observers. So, you live in some small corrupt country where you might get thrown into dark cell or murdered depending on how you say you voted, but even there the exit polls don't have this "Bush-voter exit poll fear".)

Ok, so now the smoking gun.

In places where they had a lack of Bush voters responding to the exit poll -- (ie. a vote for Bush recorded, but no exit poll vote recorded; meaning for example 60 Bush votes and 40 Kerry votes but of the 10 people exit polled, 4 said Bush and 6 said Kerry) -- these precincts all saw overwhelming support for Gay marriage amendment. So, the President race has this Bush anomaly, but the Gay marriage amendment matches the un-adjusted exit polls.

Either people are both lying to exit pollsters and rural Ohio approves of Gay marriage AND exit polling which has worked for decades NO LONGER WORKS... Or.. They shaved enough votes in enough precincts to pad a victory. And we are only talking about 5% stuffed punchcards.

Would it surprise you to know Ohio election officials shredded the 2004 ballots in violation of a court order, and rigged recounts in most counties (pre-counted the pre-selected precincts), and there were hundreds of optical scan ballots that looked like this one:
http://www.wakeupandsaveyourcountry.com/cheated/imgs/home/ballot.jpg

I totally agree.

The U.N. uses exit poll data to determine if small countries have held fair elections.

The 2004 exit poll discrepancies in America were...statistically alarming.

If such poll results would have taken place in any other country, the conclusion would have been obvious: the republicans stole the election again.

All hail the Resident of the United States! Sifted some time ago was an expose on Diebold and electronic voting in general. They put some handy little virus on the pc cards the put in the machines, did a test vote and recorded the records. It made one of the participating election workers cry because she realized all her work was for naught.

*dead (revver embed)

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by oritteropo.