Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
15 Comments
kronosposeidonsays...OMG. How has this NOT been sifted already!? Ya know, a while back I thought about posting a video for this very same piece, and then I got distracted by some other video and thought, "Oh well, it's probably been sifted already."
I'm glad you posted this one, girlfriend.
Norsuelefanttisays...Nice post, but:
http://www.videosift.com/video/Dave-Brubeck-Take-5-1961
The same song, but different performance, so I guess it's fair game...
crittttersays...^ I listened to both. Slightly different tempos, 5 years difference, if you love Dave Brubeck, listen to them both and hear the evolution.
Trancecoachsays...that time signature is like.. totally ridiculous. and great
Farhad2000says...One of my all time favorite jazzy tracks. It was reminds me of early summer days in Montreal, the sun shining, the breeze coming down from Mont-Royal, smoking carefully rolled joints in the park under a canopy of blooming green trees, you can hear the drumming from Pan pan from a distance. Bliss.
*promote
siftbotsays...Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Thursday, July 3rd, 2008 1:02am PDT - promote requested by Farhad2000.
10677says...Can someone please explain Jazz to me? So much of it just sounds random and dissonant to me - like that entire stretch from 1:00 to 1:17 or 1:53 to approx 2:50. It just sounds so gross. I'm almost physically repulsed by the ugly sounds coming from that sax, and it is a startling constrast with the beautiful intro of this song. What is the merit and reasoning behind Jazz?
Crakesays...^buy a sax, go nuts, and find out?
I've only felt some sort of jazzy inspiration a couple of times, playing my sax, but it was awesome. now i live in a dorm though, and a sax-mute is an unwieldy, expensive thing, and stuffing it with a woolen sock doesn't cut it, and [insert a thousand other excuses]...
siftbotsays...Tags for this video have been changed from 'Dave Brubeck, Take Five, 1966' to 'Dave Brubeck, Paul Desmond, Take Five, 1966' - edited by Ornthoron
Farhad2000says...*promote
siftbotsays...Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Sunday, December 14th, 2008 10:40pm PST - promote requested by Farhad2000.
siftbotsays...Tags for this video have been changed from 'Dave Brubeck, Paul Desmond, Take Five, 1966' to 'Dave Brubeck, Paul Desmond, Take Five, 1966, 60s' - edited by kronosposeidon
laurasays...*reclaimvote!!!!!
raviolisays...Yeahh!!
1-2-3,
1-2,
1-2-3,
1-2,
1-2-3,
1-2,
1-2-3,
1-2........
Opus_Moderandisays...>> ^10677:
Can someone please explain Jazz to me? So much of it just sounds random and dissonant to me - like that entire stretch from 1:00 to 1:17 or 1:53 to approx 2:50. It just sounds so gross. I'm almost physically repulsed by the ugly sounds coming from that sax, and it is a startling constrast with the beautiful intro of this song. What is the merit and reasoning behind Jazz?
It's improvisation. Sometimes you have to really be in the musicians head, so to speak, to get it. Because it mostly depends on how they feel at that time. Listen to the one in Norsueleffanti's link, that one is a little more melodic.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.