Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
6 Comments
marinarasays...*promote
siftbotsays...Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 6:26am PDT - promote requested by marinara.
Edgeman2112says...Private Entity = utilities, networks, phone companies, banks, etc. For example, hackers can today get into utility networks and manipulate the function and output of that facility. That represents a public danger to which the government should have an interest in protecting. The private utility should protect itself, but many can scantly afford it.
messengersays...You're missing Cenk's point, that this legislation, once again, is overly-broad in its application. It's unnecessary for it to cover all private entities. It could be limited to government and utility companies, but it isn't. Protection isn't the problem. It's that this bill introduces too much protection, and it will be used to shut down websites that don't pose a serious threat.>> ^Edgeman2112:
Private Entity = utilities, networks, phone companies, banks, etc. For example, hackers can today get into utility networks and manipulate the function and output of that facility. That represents a public danger to which the government should have an interest in protecting. The private utility should protect itself, but many can scantly afford it.
notarobotsays...If they have their way, we're all going to jail.
Studios: embedding YouTubes makes you guilty of infringement
Porksandwichsays...Jail, only if you don't have money...they want you to pay to stay free until you can't.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.