Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
5 Comments
Zonbiesays...wow thats impressive...
iwastheturkeysays...That's it. I'm moving to Montana.
Enzobluesays...Utah has the lowest lung cancer rate in the US.. but noooo that comes from smoking doesn't it? *snicker
Edit: Their total fossil fuel emissions map almost looks exactly like this one: Lung cancer by state With the exception of California, (Thanks Santa Ana winds!) Surprise surprise.
Ekleksays...Would've been nice to show the CO2 emissions in this fashion as a global phenomena that goes beyond political boundaries (enabling to show the emissions relative to the rest of the world..this video looks at total emissions of several countries:
http://www.videosift.com/video/Hans-Roslings-GapCast-Energy-and-Emissions
), but this way daily car/airplane commuters and gadget aficionados in the US are pointed at more directly - especially because by showing the geographical distribution of emissions over time.
Aemaethsays...>> ^Enzoblue:
Edit: Their total fossil fuel emissions map almost looks exactly like this one: Lung cancer by state With the exception of California, (Thanks Santa Ana winds!) Surprise surprise.
Actually, it looks quite different. Notice the emissions in Washington, Nevada, and Oregon, then compare to Wisconsin and Minnesota. I get where you're going here, but it doesn't seem to be a strong correlation to me.
I am surprised how little LA has, considering how a few years back there used to be smog alerts.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.