What a screwed-up invidual O'Reilly is. A bully, plain and simple.

"An exposition of sexuality in a minor situation is inappropriate in an academic setting."

So... anyone who exposes their heterosexuality in school is also inappropriate? Isn't that just as much an implication of blatantly declaring their sexuality in an academic setting?

Why yes, yes it is. Good point Bill. ::eyeroll::

"They're not flaunting their sexuality."
"How do you know?!"

Bravo, Bill, Bravo.

Every criticism levelled at O'Reilly must also be levelled squarely at the millions of people who view his show.

oh, god! o'reilly used to be a highschool teacher?!?!

"You have to respect their point of view because it is a valid point of view."

Yes, Bill, defend bigotry again. Don't "normalize" homosexuality.

God forbid we finally except the fact that some people are gay.

What a dumb fuck!
I'm sorry but no wonder in his experience, kids rebel.
He's a dumb fuck.

Does this guy have kids.

Holy crap. NONE of Bill's 'valid points' are in any way valid.

* Why is it bad to normalize it? It SHOULD BE NORMALIZED, because it is completely NORMAL for some people to be gay.
* It's harder to be a gay person. Well DUH, if dickheads like you keep making it 'abnormal' and make kids feel wrong to be gay, then that will continue... it SHOULDN'T be harder. And the only way it's not going to be harder? Is to make it NORMAL.
* Religion. A Fucking bullshit argument. Because some people are bigoted and don't like homosexuals, and use religion as their get out of jail free card to be a bigoted shit, that does NOT make it ok in any sense of the word. Fuck religion as an excuse for being a racist or bigoted dick.
* Sexualising minors? In what way are they doing ANYTHING more or less than the hetrosexual kids? Fuck off once again.

Gah... narrow minded shit for brains who tries to do the 'well, some people have these valid concerns'.

THEY ARE IN NO WAY VALID

NO WAY

IN NO POSSIBLE WAY ARE THEY VALID