Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
7 Comments
kir_mokumi would love to talk to these guys after a bottle of single malt...
hpqpUgh, I feel dirty for upvoting this... the *stupid hurts so bad!
acidSpineIt's amazing how their massive brains fit inside their tiny thick skulls
Boise_LibWhy do I always think Ray Comfort is trying to sell me a ShamWow?
Invisible Space Dust sounds like a good name for a band.
YogiIt's pretty cool how you can call Scientists...Evolutionists and dismiss them. I mean I understand you don't want to believe an Evolutionist...by how about the Scientists that developed the concepts that gets your Nascars to go faster? Or the big Plasma tv in full HD you can use to watch your Nascars make another left turn?
I get that you don't want to believe any friggin idiot that posts a video on YouTube. But to reject any sort of expert opinion whatsoever? Just stop going to the doctor...turn off your tv...go outside and make a hut.
sawtoothsays...I'm always amused at the painting requires a painter, creation requires a creator argument that Ray loves so much. Of course, the creator never seems to need to be created. Funny how they always leave that bit out.
TrancecoachIf Atheists believe that "nothing made everything" (a "scientific impossibility"), does that then mean that "Theists" ("religionists?") believe that "something/someone made everything?" And what made that something/someone? And how is this any more scientifically possible?
Using a empirical/scientific argument to support an inane philosophical position is simply shallow and foolish.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.