Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
11 Comments
hpqpsays...Brain = 'sploded.
RhesusMonksays...*promote
siftbotsays...Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Tuesday, May 15th, 2012 11:22am PDT - promote requested by RhesusMonk.
kceaton1says...Without looking I'll assume this can apply directly to String Theory and the number of "structural dimensions" needed in order for it to work. I'll look quickly and see. However if I'm wrong, the reason I made this quick assumption is knowing about their "dimensional conundrum": how many are there? I'll go check, their may be a strange link even if not thought of already as they deal, in some ways, with a bit of the same problem, indirectly. BRB.
------
edit-
Only a limited number of connections, so more or less, NO. They are not as of right now connected. But, if they both end up on the same number of dimensions--the number is the same--that WOULD indeed be interesting. Something to put on the back burner me thinks, to remember for a far off or not so far off future...
jmzerosays...These are pretty pansy little numbers; sure they're kind of long, but they're computable. We know digits of this number.
If you want truly large numbers, you want to use the Busy beaver function. These are numbers for which we can say beautiful, absolute things like:
in the context of ordinary mathematics, neither the value nor any upper-bound of Σ(10↑↑10) can be proven
That is a majestic bloody number.
My_designsays...I just round it off to 42.
Gutspillersays...g64 - 1 = Brain don't explode.
DrNoodlessays...What a shitty and pointless thing. Ramble ramble ramble.
brycewi19says...So what about g65?
messengersays...*learn
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (Learn) - requested by messenger.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.