Kevin Ryan is a Chemist that was employed by Underwriters Labrotory
NIST is an Agency with Bush Appointees.
What is Bush Science? One of the most important facts.
The Bush administration appointees have been distorting Scientific fact.
Here is a fact : No Building exhibiting all the characteristics of controlled demolition has ever NOT been a controlled demolition.
Mike Taylor of the National Association of Demolition Contractors says it looked like an Implosion.
Ronald Hamburger - a structural engineer aqnd contributor to the FEMA and NIST reports said that it appeared to him that charges had been placed in the building.
He asks "Where are the real experts?"
He discusses all the various reports
The same players that lied about OK City also were the ones who covered the WTC buiding collapse.
Gene Corley
Charles Thorton
Shankar Nair
These guys say they knew what happened.....HOW?
10 Comments
siftbotsays...Moving this video to Constitutional_Patriot's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.
quantumushroomsays...http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=4#steel
Truthers take comfort in the belief that 9-11 was an inside job, I think, because it's reassuring to believe evil intent remains solely in the sphere of wealthy, civilized Caucasian cabals and that an insane Islamic menace is just a glib fabrication of warmongers.
As for Oklahoma, I guess Tim McVeigh went quietly to his execution because the conspirators threatened to kill him if he exposed them.
There can be no compromise on these subjects.
jimnmssays...From your own link:
The Madrid fire burned for 24 hours at temperatures up to 800°C (1500°F) and did not collapse. In 2004, Venezuela's tallest building burned uncontrolled for 17 hours and did not collapse. WTC7 had two small fires which burned for 6 hours and it collapsed in what looks like a controlled demolition.
When the tapes from 9/11 firefighters in were released, there was no mention of communication problems as we were told, and firefighters only reported small pockets of fire, not a huge inferno that can melt steel.
If those fires were burning at 1500-1800°F, the people on that floor would have been dead.
I'm no conspiracy theory nutcase, but I'm also not stupid, the "official" explanations of collapse just don't match reality.
Constitutional_Patriotsays...*promote
siftbotsays...Self promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued - promote requested by original submitter Constitutional_Patriot.
SDGundamXsays...>> ^jimnms:
From your own link...
(lots of info snipped)
If those fires were burning at 1500-1800°F, the people on that floor would have been dead.
I'm no conspiracy theory nutcase, but I'm also not stupid, the "official" explanations of collapse just don't match reality.
You're assuming that the entire floor is at a uniform temperature. That's not how a building fire works. The temperature only needed to be that hot in specific pockets to weaken the supports. You also don't have to weaken every single support (ie, the whole floor doesn't need to be engulfed in flames) to cause a catastrophic failure. Although built with redundancy in mind, every support beam can only take on the load of so much stress from other failing support beams before it too fails.
I know conspiracy theory-ing is fun, but there are more gaps in the conspiracy theories than in the official explanation of what happened in 9-11. That makes the official explanation "truthier" in my book.
EndAllsays...*conspiracy
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (Conspiracy) - requested by EndAll.
antsays...*dead I think.
siftbotsays...This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by ant.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.