If we're going to criticize the realism of it: How about the fact that the paratroopers were obviously falling several times faster than terminal velocity?

And also the fact that it's another American Godzilla (cause what could go wrong?)

Take their guns? Nah. We should just give them ours. What could go wrong?

"What could go wrong?"

I watched drive last night for the first time.

Imagine a decent movie about the mafia, a guy who screws up and him trying to make good for hsi wife and kids. Theres all sorts of interesting charaters, a garage operator who got in trouble with the mafia in the 80s, and now runs a stunt car company, a jewish ganster who wants to be italian. Sounds good... interesting. Well they took that movie, and for some reason slapped in an additional bad guy, cept hes mute, has no expression, and then kills all the actual characters that were interesting.... oh wait, no... hes the good guy... apparently...

Its as if at the last minute they had an executive come in and say, what this movie needs is a mute psycopath... what could go wrong.

@Sagemind, Agreed on all counts. Education will receive fewer incorrect submissions, but both will continue to require some managing.

I'm thinking of *Pedagogy as a clearer name for Education. Other names don't capture what the word "Education" does because it includes theories of learning which are abstracted from teachers/teaching/classrooms etc.

I didn't specify above, but I'm pretty clear on line between the types of things I want the Learning channel to include and not: a video where the intent of the creator was clearly or presumably education. For the channels in the description above, that's obvious and easy.

Things that are out: normal *news broadcasts/exposé journalism; crazy/interesting/neat-thing-happened (*wtf,*comedy); people learning the hard way (*EIA,*fail,*fear);

An edge case that I might allow are things like http://videosift.com/video/Why-You-Should-NEVER-Pump-Iron-Alone, where could reasonably guess it was published not for any wow factor (nobody laughs at him on camera or comes off looking victorious), but to educate others about what can happen if you're not careful (and it was clearly sifted with that intent). This is different from http://videosift.com/video/Jumping-into-a-frozen-pool-What-could-go-wrong where the intent is clearly comedy/fail.

@dag, Ba-dum ching.

There were more ways that could go wrong than right.
That's what you get for being stupid.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

This achievement has earned you your "Silver Tongue" Level 12 Badge!

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

>> ^Fletch:

Did he say his new band was "Seeks Clue"?


I thought he said his new belt is called sears kill. Strange either way.

>> ^Zaibach:
Not what I expected.
Yeah, among the other candidates for "What could go wrong" is successfully getting through the ice, but not being able to find your way back out.

In reply to this comment by Yogi:
After that, just lay down on the ice to keep the swelling down.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!! =oD

Sumnabitch!!!! *dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Jumping-into-a-frozen-pool-What-could-go-wrong
>> ^radx:

http://videosift.com/video/Jumping-into-a-frozen-pool-What-could-go-w
rong

This video has been declared a duplicate by the original submitter; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by messenger.