>> ^djsunkid:
I just noticed this was in cooking. Just because it is a fryer, doesn't mean it belongs here.


The cooking channel has a strict anti-cannibalism policy, then.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'deep fried, watchmen, rorshach, eew' to 'deep fried, watchmen, rorshach, eew, badassery' - edited by EndAll

This video has been declared a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by rasch187.

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Watchmen-aerosol-graffiti-timelapse-video

I'm surprised I didn't see any mention of "Who will watch the watchmen?" graffiti that was so prevalent in the novel.

Otherwise, awesome stuff.

I heard that Alan Moore put an evil curse on the Watchmen movie. I love him.

A Terry Gilliam Watchmen would have been a fucking disaster.

I'm going to say it: I liked 'V for Vendetta,' but I'll grant you that I never read the book. Having said that, I do agree that 'From Hell', 'League of Extraordinary Gentlemen' and 'Watchmen' were all steaming piles of poo. And so was '300.'

*talks

This is why I only watch obscure art house films from Bulgaria shot on expired film stock using pin hole tin cans.

Cinema is dead.

Seriously bar seeing Watchmen and ridiculing it I have no interest in any new releases so far. Sure those upcoming Sci-fi flicks look interesting but the best Sci-fi films seem to have been made already.

I mean I can't even count the amount of times I watched 2001 and Bladerunner.

Party pooper.

In reply to this comment by djsunkid:
I just noticed this was in cooking. Just because it is a fryer, doesn't mean it belongs here.

... said the guy with the "Watchmen" avatar.

Thanks Johan!


>> ^rasch187:
promote, see here for details: http://woohoo.videosift.com/talk/And-The-Winner-Is-1#comment-734884

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

>> ^Sylvester_Ink:
I thought the movie was pretty decent and all, but one thing I object to is that Rorschach was never this sadistically brutal in the GN. In the GN he uses the cooking fat as a quick way to defend himself, but here he uses it as a coup-de-grace that's really unnecessary.
The same goes for the flashback scene of the child rapist. He does not outright murder the guy, as he does in the film, but provides him with a more fitting punishment.
And finally, there's his killing of Big Figure. In the GN he drowns the guy because that's the quickest and most efficient method he has on hand. In the movie . . . well, although we didn't see it, it was certainly unnecessary.
That's what made Rorschach a likable character in the comic. He was dispensing justice in his own way, but here it seems to be a slaughter he savors, and that makes him less likable a character.
Ah well, enough from me.


Weird, I'll have to reread the GN to say for sure, its been a few months, but I remember the whole thing with Big Figure going down about the same way. I at least remember laughing at the blood leaking out from under the bathroom door. I thought this scene and the one with the pedophile murderer being fairly close. Maybe I read into it a bit differently.

All and all I was impressed by the movie, it seemed to stay fairly true to the GN aside from obvious time issues(no guy floating around on dead bodies in a GN series for starters), and the complete lack of tentacled beast at the end.

Your video, Watchmen - Rorshach: You're locked in here with me!, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.