Because she's a Democrat. That's the only reason you're okay with it. But it's ridonculous for him to say that after being accused of sexual harassment multiple times. Talk about lack of political awareness.

>> ^quantumushroom:

Cain calling out a cretinous woman who reeks of self-annointed royalty is fine by me.
"Suck this or lose your job" Filth Clinton, not so much.

Cain calling out a cretinous woman who reeks of self-annointed royalty is fine by me.

"Suck this or lose your job" Filth Clinton, not so much.

I never liked royalty... so, long live king Hybrid?!


(disclaimer: this is a congratulation post)

So you basically agree it the government that the true problem but you instead choose to attack other such as in the video.


Smart, very Smart.

>> ^cosmovitelli:

>> ^bobknight33:
You issue is the Government. Your elected officials vote for this. Stop voting in crooked officials and this shit will stop.

Impossible under the current system. That's like telling Italy to just get rid of the Mafia.
Anyone who doesn't play it their way will be assimilated by the application of large (for normal people) bribes, and/or smeared and ruined through the right wing press.. or killed.
These are people who have ACTIVELY campaigned against global warming awareness and financial regulation, who tricked the US govenment into handing them $800bn last time they fucked up, who make money off dead brown babies ('we don't count bodies - especially childrens bodies').. and so much more.
You are dealing with the same sort of men who under different circumstances become dictators and torturers. You want to take their money and power off them? Good luck.
The USA was created because of the impossibility of reform under the entrenched European mafia families (i.e royalty and aristocracy).
Imagine if the US got to the point where some overpriveliged simpleton became ruler just because his daddy was before him, and realligned the countrys military and economic clout to serve only the aristocratic elite of newly minted barons and earls?
It may be time to find a new bit of land somewhere..

>> ^bobknight33:
You issue is the Government. Your elected officials vote for this. Stop voting in crooked officials and this shit will stop.


Impossible under the current system. That's like telling Italy to just get rid of the Mafia.

Anyone who doesn't play it their way will be assimilated by the application of large (for normal people) bribes, and/or smeared and ruined through the right wing press.. or killed.

These are people who have ACTIVELY campaigned against global warming awareness and financial regulation, who tricked the US govenment into handing them $800bn last time they fucked up, who make money off dead brown babies ('we don't count bodies - especially childrens bodies').. and so much more.

You are dealing with the same sort of men who under different circumstances become dictators and torturers. You want to take their money and power off them? Good luck.
The USA was created because of the impossibility of reform under the entrenched European mafia families (i.e royalty and aristocracy).

Imagine if the US got to the point where some overpriveliged simpleton became ruler just because his daddy was before him, and realligned the countrys military and economic clout to serve only the aristocratic elite of newly minted barons and earls?

It may be time to find a new bit of land somewhere..

These are from her "Shelley Duvall's Fairy Tale Theatre" series. My wife got the whole series a little while ago and we re-watched it for the first time since both of us were kids. There are a ton of older actors and comedians including and incredibly hairy, young Robin Williams as the Frog Prince.

I miss Shelley Duvall sometimes as she's been in a few of my favorite movies that I watched as a kid. I honestly thought she was dead but I just looked her up on IMDB and she's living a quiet life cashing in royalty checks.

Monday, August 15. 2011

Nero in the White House
By Mychal Massie

Three significant historical events have been eclipsed by Obama: 1) Jimmy Carter will no longer be looked upon as the worst president in American history; 2) Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton will no longer be recognized as the greatest liars in presidential history; 3) Clinton's stain on Monica's dress, and what that did to the White House in general and the office of the president specifically, will forever pale in comparison to the stain and stench of Obama.

I need not spend much time on the failure of Obama as president. His tenure has been a failure on every measurable level. So much so, in fact, that some of the staunchest, most respected liberal Democrats and Democratic supporters have not only openly criticized him – some even more harshly than this essayist – but they have called for him to step down.

Richard Nixon's words "I am not a crook," punctuated with his involvement in Watergate, and Bill Clinton's finger-wagging as he told one of the most pathetic lies in presidential history, in the aftermath of Obama, will be viewed as mere prevarications.

Mr. Nixon and Clinton lied to save their backsides. Although, I would argue there are no plausible explanations for doing what they did, I could entertain arguments pursuant to understanding their rationales for lying. But in the case of Obama, he lies because he is a liar. He doesn't only lie to cover his misdeeds – he lies to get his way. He lies to belittle others and to make himself look presentable at their expense. He lies about his faith, his associations, his mother, his father and his wife. He lies and bullies to keep his background secret. His lying is congenital and compounded by socio-psychological factors of his life.

Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood.

As the stock markets were crashing, taking with them the remaining life saving of untold tens of thousands, Obama was hosting his own birthday celebration, which was an event of epicurean splendidness. The shamelessness of the event was that it was not a state dinner to welcome foreign dignitaries, nor was it to honor an American accomplishment – it was to honor the Pharaoh, Barack Hussein Obama. The event's sole purpose was for the Pharaoh to have his loyal subjects swill wine, indulge in gluttony and behavior unfit to take place on the property of taxpayers, as they suffer. It was of a magnitude comparable to that of Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski's $2 million birthday extravaganza for its pure lack of respect for the people.

Permit me to digress momentarily. The U.S. Capitol and the White House were built with the intent of bringing awe and respect to America and her people. They were also built with the intent of being the greatest of equalizers. I can tell you, having personally been to both, there is a moment of awe and humility associated with being in the presence of the history of those buildings. They are to be honored and inscribed into our national psyche, not treated as a Saturday night house party at Chicago's Cabrini-Green.

The people of America own that home Obama and his wife continue to debase with their pan-ghetto behavior. It is clear that Obama and family view themselves as royalty, but they're not. They are employees of "we the people," who are suffering because of his failed policies. What message does this behavior send to those who today are suffering as never before?

What message does it send to all Americans who are struggling? Has anyone stopped to think what the stock market downturn forebodes for those 80 million baby boomers who will be retiring in the next period of years? Is there a snowball's chance in the Sahara that every news program on the air would applaud this behavior if it were George W. Bush? To that point, do you remember the media thrashing Bush took for having a barbecue at the White House?

Like Nero – who was only slightly less debaucherous than Caligula – with wine on his lips Obama treated "we the people" the way Caligula treated those over whom he lorded.

Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement – while America's people go homeless, hungry and unemployed.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

What did I do to give you that impression? I think the concepts of royalty and tradition are both bullshit.

And we already are friends, dumbass -- Facebook wouldn't lie to me.

>> ^rottenseed:

No, I just thought you liked royal tradtions...jesus. What's a fag like me gotta do to make friends around here?!

Nowhere does it say here that Paul Revere warned the British of anything.
Paul Revere's House

As a matter of fact it very clearly states in his personal letters and deposition of the midnight ride that he did everything that he could to avoid the British.
Paul Revere's Letters
Apparently there were lots of threats by the British soldiers to "blow his brains out". (Read it, you'll see. ;^)

I am not sure how she is making the connection between the British and the right to bear arms. The Declaration of Independence says nothing about bearing arms. It does say lots about the abuses of the American colonists by the British Royalty and about the elimination of taxation without representation. I thought that it was the Constitution that was adopted once independence was achieved that gave the right to bear arms.

Midnight Ride - 1775
Declaration of Independence - 1776
American Revolutionary War ends - 1783
United States Constitution adopted - 1787
Bill of Rights - 1789
2nd Amendment adopted - 1791

This tells me that the right to keep and bear arms was not ratified until 16 years after the midnight ride and was likely not a burning issue at the time.

As I am not a scholar of American history I may be mistaken and would happily defer to anyone who has the right of it.

>> ^eric3579:

Thank you

In reply to this comment by geo321:
Excellency!

Thank you

In reply to this comment by silvercord:
Well done, Mikes!

Thank you

In reply to this comment by Shepppard:
Congratulations!

You're most welcome sir/maam

In reply to this comment by MikesHL13:
LOL. Thank you

In reply to this comment by Deano:
Like a cowering Sony Executive I bow down before thee.

Thank you

In reply to this comment by Zifnab:
Wonderful work, great sifts and great commentary! Capes for everyone! Congrats!