search results matching tag: pulsars
» channel: motorsports
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
- 1
Videos (11) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (1) | Comments (14) |
- 1
Videos (11) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (1) | Comments (14) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
I Changed Astronomy Forever. He Won the Nobel Prize for It.
@vil: Well, it's actually Bell herself that has a similar opinion:
https://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/astr2030_12/sn/Bell.html
And that doesn't mean she was ignorant to the issue - she *did* tear the sexist media a new one, with gleeful wit:
I Changed Astronomy Forever. He Won the Nobel Prize for It.
It would have been a rare occurence indeed for the head of a science project to share the accolades with a student. She was second on the original paper.
Also remember this is a Nobel prize for physics, so it is very much to be had for the scientist who starts the project, creates the equipment, sets goals, is reserved when the student finds something new but then listens to her, the hypothesis and confirmation part is important and was not ms. Bells work...
So yes, the astronomical observation and discovery of the first two pulsars is hers.
The Nobel prize for physics for the discovery of pulsars went to the two scientists that contributed the most to the confirmation of the rotating neutron star hypothesis. IMHO rightfully.
Could a student have been included, man or woman? Unlikely.
Kind of..
I Changed Astronomy Forever. He Won the Nobel Prize for It.
Kind of, but the head of department is morally and ethically obligated to make note of the subordinate who made the actual discovery or breakthrough and usually shares the prize at least if it doesn’t go directly to the discovery maker alone. This is especially true when the head misinterprets and discards the data and denies any discovery was made until the discoverer, on their own, forms a hypothesis, tests it, and repeats it, all without the head of department’s involvement.
In this case, one person made the discovery and the department head dismissed it, then that subordinate on her own continued her investigation and formed her own hypothesis, tested and verified it, and only then her department head became convinced, then took ALL credit for the discovery with no mention of her. That is NOT how scientific teams work.
This wasn’t just her discovery, she figured out what it was too…her hypothesis and her testing, her repeating the discovery, almost certainly her writing it up. If she were a man, she definitely would have gotten credit for both the discovery and the hypothesis, and for confirming her hypothesis. She might not have been given the “prize” individually, but she would have definitely gotten the credit and shared in the accolades. (I think a male in the same position would have shared the prize at a minimum, and had the department head claimed credit as they did here, would have publicly disgraced the department head by proving they not only had nothing to do with the discovery, they had dismissed it when shown and added nothing at all to the hypothesis or testing it, and they would have been drummed out of the scientific community for plagiarism and theft of intellectual property).
When he dismissed her findings completely, he removed himself from the discovery and she became group leader of her own separate project. She deserves both prizes, both monetary awards, a public apology from the man who stole her work without giving her credit, and a serious civil judgement against him for any bonus, advancement, raise, accolades, or paid engagements he received based on his lie that he discovered pulsars. That’s her money that he stole.
OK I will take a risk on this one. Every scientific breakthrough is supported by scientific personnel who run experiments and collect data. The head of the laboratory or institution gets to interpret the data and get the Nobel Prize. That is how teams work in science.
Its even in the video, getting the discovery discovered is a lot of tedious work, someone has to find the anomalous signal, that is great, someone else then gets to state a hypothesis about what it means, which when it proves to be right gives them the prize. Seems fair. Even if its just one on one student and professor, unless the student comes up with a fundamental concept, just noticing an anomaly does not make a Nobel Prize laureate of the student. Even if his line of search is originally against the opinion of the professor.
Now arguably in this case Ms. Bell made a bigger contribution than just collecting data and if you juxtapose that with how women were treated back then, its a nice story. But if she were a man in the same position there would be no Nobel Prize either. And possibly no compensating prize years later.
And yes she deserves her prize, I believe.
Whole New Worlds: An Aladdin History of Exoplanets
Wasn't easy being a planet hunter back in the day *promote
I'm looking for
1 tug
The pull of a planet
1 tell
A wobbling sun
I've searched for years
Haven't found a one
But they're out there
1 jump
In radial redshift
1 slip
Of spectral lines
They'll see if I can show them the sines
Pish tosh
Green men
Take five
Take ten
Just a little cash guys
Budget's tight
Don't fund this trash guys
I can take a hint
Better face the facts
Second-hand'll have to do
Eww
All you planet hunters at the bottom
You've got fact & fantasy entwined
Finding planets except they haven't got one
Well they gotta be forming readily
When you think about it given we've got nine
1 jump
A blip in the spectrum
1 shift of meters per second
1 graph of period power
They laugh but I'm not sour
Here goes
18 months of data
Cross & correlate it
All I gotta do is run
Pish tosh
Green men
Ah don't mind them
If only they'd look closer
Would they see a pure void
No sirree
They'd find out
There's worlds galore
To see
Make way for Pegasi
51 Pegasi
First was a world
Round an old pulsar
That's true
But the news
Is a sun-like star
With wobble
Too quick & precise
To be designed
No fluke not a spot
If you like it hot
You're gonna love this find
Pegasi 51b
Planet discovered
Orbit traced
Every 4 days
Hot as can be
Its order-Jupiter size
Was something of a surprise
Especially given its star's proximity
Pegasi 51b
It's a new era
To detect
Exoplanets
Soon there'll be three
As planet pulls on its Sun
It shifts the stellar spectrum
That's how we found 51b Pegasi
How'd a planet get so close in orbit
Cause I thought you needed ice to form it
Did it later undergo some strange migration
Star too small to be so long-pulsating
And too old to be so quick rotating
Is there any other good interpretation
This will certainly help with our funding
We got your funding
We got your funding
Got a surface of 1200 C
It's treacherous
So treacherous
If in time this new breakthrough feels mundane
Planets are common
That's proof
Of the truth
I've been telling you
This is no mean anomaly
Pegasi 51b
Planet uncovered
Round a far
Main sequence star
Spectral type G
We know its mass to be high
Half Jupiter by sine i
It's 15.61 pc from home
And it shakes our faith in how planets are formed
And its star is in Pegasus
Give it an A and thus
Label the planet as b
51 Pegasi
Plotting Doppler shifts is glacial-pace
And that astrometry never prevails
But baby you're in luck cause
Up in space
You got a planet-finder never fails
You got the power of statistics now
You got a view without an atmosphere
So no more nights spent locked up in your tower
All you gotta do is wait right here
And I say
Kepler the planet-searcher
Got a dip, no 2, no 3
We just measure brightness
Plot it out & that's transiting photometry
When your stars do this
And your curves displace
Then your star's got this
Transiting its face
Then you hit compute
And lookie here
You get good diameter data
From that dip
And orbit distance from the length of year
Well now we need this tale supported by
A ground observer with a good Échelle
We got 2000 planets certified
2000 more that only time will tell
But let's take em all, plot em out
And find out if we're really all alone
Is there a rocky world we've found no doubt
That orbits in the habitable zone
Like home?
Kepler the planet searcher
Got an Earth 452b
Part of a throng
40 billion strong
There ain't never been a field
Clever as the field
There ain't never been a field
Better than the field they call
Exoplanetology
I can show you a world
A shining shimmering planet
Found concealed in the band-shifts
Of the closest star in sight
I've found hope in the skies
And facing wonder I wonder
Could the sine wave discovered be
A planet fit for life
A whole new world
A new fantastic point of blue
Placed in that narrow zone
Where water flows
Midway tween cold & steaming
A whole new world
Its sun a faint, reddish hue
Could there be waiting here
A biosphere
Evolving in this whole new world to view
Fathoming a whole new world to view
Unbelievable find
Indescribable feeling
Earthlings someday revealing
Through directly captured light
A whole new world
Don't just stare from a far
Though nigh impossible to see
Wouldn't close up be bolder
Next to its parent's flair
If life is there
We'll know through atmosphere spectroscopy
A whole new world
Block the glare of the star
A laser starshot to pursue
With a star-shaped occulter
Chasing that crazy dream
That's always been
Of walking in a whole new world with you
a whole new world
That's where we'll be
A thrilling chase
A home in space
For you and me
Star Trek: Bridge Crew Trailer
Cool enough, though not sure I'm sold on this over Artemis Spaceship Bridge Simulator... this basically is that, but having VR requirement and set in a Star Trek universe (from the comments it appears to be the JJ Abrams universe). I'm not one to be upset about it being Ubisoft.
Pulsar: Lost Colony is another one in the same thing, though it seems to be a bit more ambitious in total scope, though missing the VR requirement. It has away missions. It's the one I'd be more interested in playing... were I to have enough friends to play any of these. lol.
oritteropo (Member Profile)
you seen the Nissan Pulsar that does 240kph?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON0-VqV9vt4
Miss the old way of showing OLD videos that just got ten/10 votes to first page? (User Poll by ant)
Dear Ant,
Can you please confirm you have "Newness" selected on the front page?
That listing is without any doubt displaying published videos in order of newest publish date. This is the listing of the latest published 15 videos as directly fetched within the database:
Best Drive Thru Prank Ever
Porn Sites (RealLifeDickParty.com) - Aziz Ansari
Everything Wrong With The Hunger Games In 4 Minutes Or Less
Close Your Eyes and Fall Down
You ever get so broke, that it just becomes funny to you?
Russian Extreme Sport Mountain Ball Ends In Tragedy
The wobbly beam of the Vela pulsar
Chinese Don't Need No Stinkin' Cannons
Tosh.0 - Uncle and Niece Talk
Male to Female - 3 Year Timeline
The Ronettes - Baby I Love You (Isolated Vocals)
New Changes to YouTube?
The new russian 5th generation stealth fighter Sukhoi T-50
Atheist TV host boots Christian for calling raped kid "evil"
Star Trek TNG - Test Footage
That listing is identical to the videos currently displayed in the front page's Newness listing.
If you'd like, you can continue pretending I'm not here and respond to Dag again, but I'm sitting right here.
Sincerely,
lucky760 (not Dag)
Dag, go find an old submitted video (e.g., a year old is a good age) that has not been bumped to the front page with less nine votes. Vote it up to ten votes so it can be go to the front page. However, it is not on the front page. It is buried on page #<whatever number beside 1>.
Joy Division's graphic designer explains famous album cover
Tags for this video have been changed from 'post punk, english rock, unknown pleasures' to 'post punk, english rock, unknown pleasures, pulsar, pulsars' - edited by RhesusMonk
NordlichReiter (Member Profile)
Your video, Neutron Stars: Magnetars Pulsars- History Channel, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
A Universe wide Sift... (Art Talk Post)
Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
^From the outset you have to make an assumption that ETs are trying to make contact with other ETs. That might be a pretty irrational assumption- but it's one that we could easily make. After that, it's just a matter of finding the medium.
You're right, it could be something so far beyond us- that we have no way of grasping it.
All of our rapid advances in communication tech over the last 100 years has given us some species hubris that we are cutting edge- to a type III civilisation, we would be ants building nests - but even ants have a kind of ambition- so maybe we shouldn't lose hope.
Also, with regard to pulsars, or any stars for that matter- there could be barely discernible fluctuations in the light strength that would form a kind of modulation. The pulsar pattern might be the bigger signal saying "hey look at me" and then the subtle message comes after you know that's where to look. If I wanted to create a message beacon that many galaxies could tune in to, I would use something like a pulsar- so at least people would know where to look.
This snippet from the Wikipedia article on pulsars is very interesting:
A Universe wide Sift... (Art Talk Post)
Well quantum foam is a theoretical concept, we could just as well say we will communicate by playing the strings under the super string theory.
Pulsars on the other hand have a very steady beat of radiation. So I don't know how that could translate.
I still think SETI is a bit far out there, I mean how does an ant know what a radio wave looks like? How would we know what advanced civilization communication looks like then? I do understand their concept of looking for above normal signals.
But whats there to say they are emit signals now? The internet could be run as a closed system and you can never detect its communication. Like say a closed LAN.
Questions.
A Universe wide Sift... (Art Talk Post)
Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
I've often wondered if there might be some FTL communication net that we just haven't detected yet - vibrations in the quantum foam.
Or if you don't need FTL - maybe some pulsars are carrying messages. Optical SETI is an interesting sub-branch of SETI
The Top 10 Star Trek Technobabbles
People have already pointed out that #3 was a self-deprecating joke, but I'd like to point out that #5 was literally Data verbally inputting a password, and that #2 was entirely composed of real scientific concepts like gravity and pulsars...
Most Trek technobabble from TNG was pretty well done, and while some of it was science word salad (e.g. subatomic fluctuations with lepton and meson activity), it's usually a lot more comprehensible than computers in 24.
I'd love to see someone put together a compilation of crackpot shit that they've said or done with computers in 24.
8217 (Member Profile)
You are now an outcast. Never return to Ivory Tower. You are to wonder aimlessly on a barren moon somewhere close to an active pulsar. Be gone now. Infidel.
In reply to this comment by Kuga:
Shit, man. I accidentally discarded your Sift Talk post, my mistake completely. Very sorry!