search results matching tag: pier

» channel: motorsports

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (125)     Sift Talk (0)     Blogs (9)     Comments (196)   

Piers Morgan vs Ben Shapiro

Bruti79 says...

When was the last time someone walked into a food court and killed a bunch of people with a hoagie and a large coke? Booze is allowed and can be dangerous, but it is also illegal to drink and drive, also being drunk isn't a legit court defence.

Don't ban guns, like I said, they are tools for a lot of people where I live. Things like shotguns, hunting rifles are things that are needed to survive. Maybe it's the difference between Canada and the US. I trust my police services to defend me when I call.

I still don't see the point of hand guns for the public. Why does anyone need one? Again, it could be a difference of culture. Why would anyone need an assault weapon? Call the cops.

*edit: I also hate that Piers is using this to make himself like a hero. To me, him doing this is the same as when Fox News brings on the Phelps family to boost ratings.

GeeSussFreeK said:

I should point out that I agree with the thrust of this statement, just not the aim. People don't need unhealthy food either, but I would rather convince them rather than dictate it, if that makes any sense. 'Don't need' and 'shouldn't be allowed to possess' are 2 different arguments.

I would be interested in your argument for the non-possession of assault rifles. How will you justify it versus other things that are legal and demonstrably more lethal? Would the argument be consistent with the prohibition of drugs or alcohol, if not, how does it differ?

Piers Morgan vs Ben Shapiro

wax66 says...

Ugh... Piers is such a prick. I may usually side with the left on social issues, but dude... Shapiro completely owned Piers in both logic and in being reasonable.

Piers Morgan vs Ben Shapiro

chingalera says...

Well, I'm no fan of bullshit- Morgan got schooled in proper semantics and courtesy. The winner of the proper use of the fucking English language with a view to transmission of information and "How to answer a fucking question when asked goes to the guy who just shit down Piers throat and asked him how the kak-burger tasted.

Really think Breitbart died of natural causes?

Kofi (Member Profile)

Piers Morgan - Alex Jones Goes 'Full Retard' Part 1

Piers Morgan - Alex Jones Goes 'Full Retard' Part 2

Piers Morgan - Alex Jones Goes 'Full Retard' Part 1

VoodooV says...

haha! the number of deaths in UK and USA are just a little factoid?

tell that to their loved ones, motherfucker!

Sorry, you unhinged piece of shit, the 2nd Amendment is not sacrosanct, neither is any amendment or anything in the Constitution. That's why they're called amendments.

The more you know.

For those on the sift who are for unrestricted access to guns: At the very least I hope you can acknowledge that Alex Jones made you guys look very...very irrational and deranged. It wasn't exactly a shining moment for your side I hope you can admit.

It cracks me up that Piers didn't have to say anything, he let Jones hang himself with his own rope.

Piers Morgan - Alex Jones Goes 'Full Retard' Part 1

robbersdog49 says...

Ha ha ha! Fuckin' nut job. 4:18 is a classic.

This video shows the difference between american and english political TV. Piers Morgan is a fuckin' tool, we were glad to get rid of him in the UK, but he's doing things the english way, which is a debate. A proper debate where each person gets to say their point and then lets the other person answer the point. American TV has always pissed me off because of the lack of debate. It's all down to who shouts loudest and it's a crock of shit.

Jon Stewart on Gun Control

Jon Stewart on Gun Control

truth-is-the-nemesis (Member Profile)

Jon Stewart on Gun Control

VoodooV says...

you can have my hammer when you pry it from my cold dead hands.

Holy shit, that guy that Piers was interviewing was unstable.

When you acknowledge that it's OK that we take firearms away from criminals and the mentally ill. Then you acknowledge that weapons are not a right, they are a privilege. A privilege that can be taken away with the consent of the governed.

I think a good way to sum up what most people want to do is weed out the irresponsible gun owners from the responsible. Every time someone makes an argument for sensible regulation, the strawman of a total gun ban is thrown back. Sorry, but please try and pay attention.

Maybe YOU take owning firearms seriously. Maybe YOU train diligently, maybe YOU have your weapons securely locked up. Maybe YOU take safety seriously. Maybe YOU would be beneficial to have around in a time of crisis. But a lot of people don't and aren't.

If you acknowledge that the firearms are a responsibility, then regulation is a very responsible thing to be asking for.

We don't want your guns (except maybe assault weapons), keep them, just prove you can keep them safe. I think that's what most people are asking for.

Piers Morgan - Alex Jones Goes 'Full Retard' Part 2

Piers Morgan - Alex Jones Goes 'Full Retard' Part 1

SiftDebate: What are the societal benefits to having guns? (Controversy Talk Post)



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon