search results matching tag: nutty
» channel: motorsports
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (32) | Sift Talk (1) | Blogs (4) | Comments (170) |
Videos (32) | Sift Talk (1) | Blogs (4) | Comments (170) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Kid Faces Expulsion for Shooting AirSoft Gun at Home
AFAIK playing with toy guns is a staple of growing up for ~every boy.
This story sounds nutty.
-scheherazade
'Enders Game' Writer's Ridiculous Racist Rant Against Obama
This needed to be the first post!
Referenced article can be found here:
http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2013-05-09-1.html
Card very clearly qualifies that the quoted statements are entirely a 'what if Obama decided to act like Stalin or Hitler' mental exercise and not his personal beliefs. The stuff he throws in prior as his actual opinion is far more moderate and not nearly so nutty. This has gotta be one of the lowest points I've seen from Cenk...
Well I'm disappointed in TYT.
The original article on the Slate was hack written 'Caveat in Paragraph 19' tabloid junk. The caveat being that they fail to mention they are quoting fiction until the very end of the article.
TYT have taken the bait and regurgitated the story without even mentioning the caveat. The conviction that Cenk has in his furore (which is exactly what tabloid articles aim to cause) makes me doubt TYT's credibility on other stories they report that I haven't happened to have read first.
The article the Slate quoted is "Civilization Watch - Unlikely Events" which you can read directly here.
Cards' political views are about as far removed from my own as you can get; but this essay was about reinterpreting history and the absurdity of predicting the future.
You could argue that Card is protecting his real views behind a shield of fiction, or some weak argument to that effect, but It's obvious TYT didn't even read it
Grand Theft Auto V - First Gameplay Trailer
So wait. They make the game on PC, squeeze it on console hardware...and then don't announce a PC release? I thought the idea of developing just for consoles meant you could fine tune the engine for specific hardware, but you say that they make a PC "version" and then scale it backwards. Sounds nutty.
I'd wager a lot of this stuff IS running on the ingame engine, in real time, but that its heavily scripted with very little actually interactivity.
Anyway. The heist focus sounds cool. Also, for me GTA is a driving game at heart. I used to do laps of Vice City in the Sabre Turbo trying to beat my best time. Shooting at people was a minigame inbetween driving. If they can flesh out the minigame thats cool, just not at the expense of driving.
At this point it's pretty likely it's a development build running on PC, too early to tell if it's really been optimised well for current gen consoles.
Anyway, I'm glad they're focussing explicitly on mechanics. I've always found GTA games to be full of superflous 'gameplay' I wouldn't ever spend time on. Perhaps I'm part of the cynical bunch that doesn't buy the immersion angle.
If more mini-games this time around are actual fun diversions then great. If the gun mechanics are tightened up, maybe it'll play as a better 3rd person shooter in it's own right.
Otherwise, I worry they're just bloating out the feature pool like they've done in each successive sequel.
Q&A From The Busey Zone
As nutty as he is, I find him irresistibly endearing.
Another friendly reminder from the Association of Motorcycle Helmet Manufacturers of North America to always remember, "Tuck your head inside, before each ride."
Hheheheh...The Busey Zone must be the opposite of the Zandor zone
Squirrel Launcher Gets Rid Of Pesky Squirrels in .5 seconds
One day he's going to do this to the wrong kind of squirrel, and while he's standing there cackling and congratulating himself on another of man's triumphs over nature, the squirrel is going to unfurl her little arm flaps, perform a graceful 180 degree bank and enter a steep high-speed dive, razor-sharp incisors leading, and screaming death from above as she homes in on her new found nutty prey.
Kinetic energy is their ally. Never forget.
Emma Watson is Dangerous!
>> ^Kofi:
I get the feeling that if you grew up with the Harry Potter paradigm then she was someone you had a crush on. Now that she is grown up it's legitimate to sexualize her. No doubt she is pretty but she still seems like a 12 year old to me. Cute, yes. Sexy? Nope.
I didn't grow up with it--I lived through the entire 80s and 90s. I have never seen a single Harry Potter anything and I have no desire to do so. I don't find her "sexy" or "attractive" or "cute" or anything like that, and suggesting that someone would dig on underage chicks says a lot more about you than it does about the person you're accusing of such a thing.
>> ^Quboid:
I think she's very hot (and I haven't seen any Harry Potter films and don't have any weird under-age mental images) but the 'net's opinion of her seems nutty. Why do people think she's any less vacuous or self centred than anyone else? I can't help but feel that it's at least 90% because they find her attractive, which is ironically vacuous.
She is slightly pretty, but hot? I'll have to disagree with you there. Her hairy upper lip doesn't really do it for me. I find her rather average. Maybe it's the "girl next door" thing she has going on that get some guys feeling all tingly. No idea.
Emma Watson is Dangerous!
>> ^ForgedReality:
I honestly don't understand the big deal about her...
I think she's very hot (and I haven't seen any Harry Potter films and don't have any weird under-age mental images) but the 'net's opinion of her seems nutty. Why do people think she's any less vacuous or self centred than anyone else? I can't help but feel that it's at least 90% because they find her attractive, which is ironically vacuous.
Don't Pet the Kitty
>> ^PlayhousePals:
>> ^pumkinandstorm:
Awwww, he seems so afraid of something...poor kitty.
hmmm ... I interpreted it as a neurotic cat that was probably like this on occasion. Not too scared or it would have ripped that guy petting it to shreds! Too much of the old nip perhaps ... who knows. It's the same sound some cats get when you scratch the base of their tail [neither of mine do however] =o)
Kitty crack!!! That would explain it! Damn nip makes them all so nutty.
Dancing Sign in Calgary, Alberta
Those nutty Canadians!!
Louis CK - "Apologize"
and, if you will bear with my nuttiness and take a logical leap with me:
at the heart of climate change is a psychological issue: an entire species that acts as if the world revolves around them. each unique little special snowflake.
if you are teaching your kids this, you are perpetuating the problem.
Man Shoots Unmanned Police 'Speed Enforcement' Vehicle
>> ^shagen454:
The guy has to be a little crazy to do that. Not that I find anything really wrong with it and I love that he did it; but the guy is obviously a little nutty.
You'd have to be crazy to go to all that effort and then not even break in and steal the thousands of dollars of camera equipment inside... Shit, that one still camera looked REALLY nice. There was other equipment in there too.
If they can afford that kind of hardware and just leave it out on the side of the road and drain the battery, why can't they pay some rent-a-cop to do the same thing?
Man Shoots Unmanned Police 'Speed Enforcement' Vehicle
The guy has to be a little crazy to do that. Not that I find anything really wrong with it and I love that he did it; but the guy is obviously a little nutty.
The Most Expensive Coffee in the World
"mmmmm.....nutty"
Can Wisdom Save Us? – Documentary on preventing collapse.
Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
Then, in that same vein - could you make the case that religion is not necessarily the cause of atrocities either. Correlation is not causation. Or in other words - Nutty sociopaths may be religious - but it's not why they commit atrocities - just a side effect.
>> ^Fletch:
^ Not completely true, and I would argue that the cult of personality surrounding Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, Mussolini, et al, is at the very root of religion. They may or may not have been atheists, but they were definitely using religion of a sort to gain and keep power. Dogma is dogma, and blind faith in dogma or a leader IS religion, whether that faith is whipped up through nationalist rhetoric or pious devotion to a deity. "Christian" is just a different flavor on the same banana split.
Hirohito was viewed as a living god. Hitler killed Jews because he felt it was god's will. This whole "atheism was responsible for the Holocaust" bullshit is just that... tired bullshit. It's the reactionary mantra and selective parsing of history by blissfully-ignorant religious zealots who can't compute, or, just refuse to accept the utter devastation religion has wreaked on the human species IN THE NAME OF GOD.
Lack of belief is not a belief, and connecting atheism to 20th century atrocities is several logical fallacies all rolled into one dumb assertion. Believing it and saying it over and over doesn't make it true, and just because some murderous bastard was an atheist doesn't mean some nutter's concept of atheism was the cause.
>> ^dag:
^Shiny makes a good point - Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot - the biggest baddies of the 20th, we're all atheists. Might it be that extremist ideologies of any kind are the problem?
Europe: Lost Without Christianity
On the bright side the only place this BS appears is on nutty christo networks and a little site that sifts talking cats.