Hmm. I see your point, and it was my bad in not noticing that the times were different. I can never remember what the best call is for potential dupes like this - where the time differs, but the intention/message of the clip remains the same. What do others think? Perhaps it needs a discussion? In the meantime, I'll call *notdupe >> ^mintbbb:

>> ^Hybrid:
dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Kicking-Ass-on-the-Keyboard

If you want to call this a dupe, is OK. However, this is the whole song, and the other is a 1 minute 39 second clip. So technicall tyey are not dupes (I didn't notice the other submission when I submitted mine).

Not a problem kind of figured it would come up.

In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Oh damn, you're right. My bad. *notdupe

Oh damn, you're right. My bad. *notdupe

Ok, did more research, maybe I can call a *notdupe and rescind that prior comment based on community precedent:

http://videosift.com/talk/Careful-with-the-DUPE-invocation

*notdupe

Not sure if this is a dupe!
1). the other one is dead so we can't compare.
2). Read the comments: Things that just don't even come up in this video:
a). History of Bush
b). Slavery
c). Talk about the Civil War in general
d). Creationism museum
e). "...this video starts off by attacking a creation museum, then goes off on a tangent about nations, crazy denials of various people and then... Bush lie-berry? Going on about Iraq? Winning the war on terror? Where to start? What connection do they have?" --user #9684

Just doesn't sound like the same video to me! *notdupe

*notdupe

Also, *notdupe. One is short the other is long and the point of the two videos is different.

I can see that. I like this embed better, too. Can we *notdupe it?

In reply to this comment by Tymbrwulf:
I don't know if you can constitute that as a dupe due to the different music changing the pace and feel of the video.

In reply to this comment by KnivesOut:
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/3-328-Still-Pictures-of-London-Mashed-Together

Sorry isosceles, this is a much better embed than the original, but still a dupe.

*notdupe

There should be some sort of dedicated page that lists all the videos that have had the new dupeof called on them. So gold members and higher can go through that list calling isdupe on them, if they are infact dupes. A "Dupe Pool" essentially

Also, what if a video isn't a dupe? Shouldn't it be possible to say notdupe, to remove it from awaiting isdupe?

*notdupe either. Different views.

Perhaps we could have an added security, be doing it like with ban - the first dupeof invoker adds the link and the second just says *dupeof and it happens, or another says *notdupe and the first dupeof is cleared again.

*dupeof should send straight to discuss whereas 2 (gold or above) members must agree with a *dupe command. (2) *notdupe commands will return the video

Perhaps we could have an added security, be doing it like with ban - the first dupeof invoker adds the link and the second just says *dupeof and it happens, or another says *notdupe and the first dupeof is cleared again.