Yea, it was such a brilliant post I don't know what I'm going to do with myself.

>> ^blankfist:

Not nice to tell people to shut up.

Not nice to tell people to shut up.

>> ^gwiz665:

Yeah just read up on it. I'm with you on your view regarding the video. I also think he's out of line with his insinuation. I do also think you should tone down the language in there; calling him a cunt will only escalate it, I think.
He can call you whatever he likes, even though it's not nice - and vice versa of course. There are some "rules" about personal attacks, but the attacks have to be pretty outrageous. I mean, look at what people tend to call QM every once in a while, and it's tolerated.
Throbbin's a nice guy, I guess he's just got an exposed nerve about this since he has little daughters (would be my guess).
In reply to this comment by dannym3141:
>> ^gwiz665:
O_o Who's been doing that?
In reply to this comment by dannym3141:
Is there something in the rulebook regarding people accusing me of being a child molester?

Check the comment i made last, then look above that one. I'm sure he meant it tongue in cheek but ... people - especially americans - over react to things like that. Or react without all the facts.
That and he's clearly several bricks short of a house, i'd like to see him warned for acting like an arse.


Fair enough, i'll stop even commenting.

He fits my description of scum of the earth - if you have kids, the last thing you should do is take it as a token to call everyone a paedophile for no reason.

Hey! It's not nice to attack me in my sleep.

In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Hiiiyaah!

>> ^gwiz665:

It's a word. It's even a written word. I don't see the harm.
Graphic content sure, sexual content sure, but words? We're not sfw'ing the comments either... fuck fuckety fuck-fuck-fuck. If you want your kids to use the internet unsupervised, be grateful we're as sfw as we are, and pray your kids don't go to encyclopediadramatica, rotten, b0g, 4chan or any of the other NSFW-fests.
You're not forcing them to learn it by having "I'm a motherfucker" on a t-shirt here - you can tell them, "that's a swear word, please don't use it in public or at all.. it's not nice" and that should be it.


I was going to totally disagree with this, but then I realised that if you want children to browse through the sift, t-shirt ads would probably be your smallest concern. SFW means safe for work and in no way means a video is suitable for young children. Two examples of videos that are not marked as NSFW:

Uncle Chuck Had His Eye Removed
Oh the horror, the horror! Snakes and Fishies eaten alive!

Edit: Acutally nevermind this comment. I see the actual issue was showing someone a specific video without offensive ads showing up on the page.

It's a word. It's even a written word. I don't see the harm.

Graphic content sure, sexual content sure, but words? We're not sfw'ing the comments either... fuck fuckety fuck-fuck-fuck. If you want your kids to use the internet unsupervised, be grateful we're as sfw as we are, and pray your kids don't go to encyclopediadramatica, rotten, b0g, 4chan or any of the other NSFW-fests.

You're not forcing them to learn it by having "I'm a motherfucker" on a t-shirt here - you can tell them, "that's a swear word, please don't use it in public or at all.. it's not nice" and that should be it.

Guess not... nice video

My 3 year old commented that she "Was standing on the sink, which is not safe. She was being not nice daddy." Personally, I just waited for her to slip off the sink, and come out of the hospital in a wheelchair singing that same diddy. But I am glad she is okay nevertheless.

But how is this comedy?

Shame on you all. Didn't your mothers teach you it's not nice to laugh at crazy people?

If people aren't nice to me, I'm not nice back. You are escalating this as much as I, but honestly it's already being blown out of proportion.

I thought "That Girl with the Rack" was a hilarious title, and I still do, because OBVIOUSLY she has a bunch to offer in the video, so it was a bit of a self-deprecation making the title. And the title WORKED, people saw the video, which is the point of any title. People seem to infer that I am a horrible person, disrespectful to women and what not, and I don't like people being aggressive at me for a stupid title. In this response you are unduly aggressive too and there's really no need for it. You say I'm the one throwing a temper tantrum - well, let's both cool down a little here.

This is why I responded poorly to you, to not take it out of context:
"No one accused you of committing a crime, but if you really cannot acknowledge why your title is demeaning and rude in referring to the individual in the video - and to women in general - then you are in denial."

Denial is something I've been accused of before, so I'm a little sensitive about it, because it is just not true. I know exactly what the title is and I chose it for a reason, not to disrespect women, not to be demeaning, but to make a damn joke.

"stop being a whiny little boy"
Very mature. I had a similar response here first, but like you said, it would just escalate it even further. I had expected better from @Issykitty.

Can't we both just be mature enough to not escalate this any further? I don't want the drama and I doubt you do either.

In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
Plucking a laundry list of words out of context in reference to your lame title does not equate a personal attack on your character as those comments were simply pointing out what I reiterated (in that your title sucked balls, seriously), and I'm really confused as to why you see it that way. I don't know what to tell you. We're all nazis/ pc thugs to you if we call your title out for what it is.

I don't give a shit or not what changes you make with your fucking title so don't do me or anyone any favors. I was responding to the seemingly misplaced temper tantrum that you threw, but I guess I know what to expect from @gwiz665. Don't fucking dare tell you that your title is demeaning, even if JUVENILE is a way nicer and gentler word to describe what I'd actually want to call your "Girl With The Rack" title. You decided from the get-go that you were going to have a hissy fit with the first person that called out your title for what it was. You are escalating this and turning it into something personal when it originally wasn't. Stop being a whiny little boy.


In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
@Issykitty "Kindly"? Are you kidding now again? "Disrespectful", "shameful", "juvenile", "sucky", "pathetic", and "denial". Those are not kind words. If you poor sensitive people had asked me nicely, I would have changed the title without throwing a hissy fit, but when people instead insinuate that I should be ashamed or attack my person, that just doesn't feel very kind at all (yes, I'm sensitive about my person, so I hit back). A PC thug by any other name is still a thug. Stop being a goddamn thug!

Honest opinion is one thing, being condescending, patronizing, and spiteful is another.

Back then I did not know how to cry foul. I wanted to see that video was on the sift, and now it is. I have since posted other videos related to the same subject matter.

I know better now, and have worked hard to be able to promote and *quality the videos and discussion I think are worth having. What keeps me around here is the comments videos inspire. I gain nothing by eliminating that. I have no intention of performing such a resurrection, or robbing @supersaiyan93 of votes. I just thought it was an example worth pointing out of misuses of power points. >> ^gwiz665:
The laws of the land were different back then, but that was indeed a wrongful discard. You should have cried foul back then, I think it would be not-nice to resurrect it now to grab the votes. >> ^notarobot:
A while back, when I was new, I posted a videothat was discarded by someone who erroneously declared it to be a dupe without even watching it. That same video has since been reposted and presently has 53 votes.
Now that I have privileges, do I promote my old vid to get the votes dupeof'd onto mine, or do I preserve the comments on the current vid that did not fall victim to mistaken discarding by leaving it alone?

The laws of the land were different back then, but that was indeed a wrongful discard. You should have cried foul back then, I think it would be not-nice to resurrect it now to grab the votes. >> ^notarobot:
A while back, when I was new, I posted a videothat was discarded by someone who erroneously declared it to be a dupewithout even watching it. That same video has since been reposted and presently has 53 votes.
Now that I have privileges, do promote my old vid to get the votes dupeof'd onto mine, or do I preserve the comments on the current vid that did not fall victim to mistaken discarding by leaving it alone?

Bad keyboard kitty. Bad kitty. Bad, bad, bad.... you aren't supposed to make fun of people when they die. That's just not nice. BAD KITTY!

oh, I just can't stay mad at you.

Look at how cute you are in that little dress playing the piano. You're my little snoogy-woogams. My wittle snoogy-woogams. Who's my snoogy-woogams? Who's my wittwe snoogy-woogams!? You are. Yes you are. Yes you are. You are my wittwe snoogy-woogams! snoogy-woogie-snoogy-woogie.....

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Think-Globally-Act-Locally

(Someone invoke isdupe when the promote has worn off.. not nice to dupeof in the middle of that.)

That does look like a direct design rip-off.

Might want to throw them a "that's not nice" email.