Hmmm. Ok fucj it. I'll go and find a video with Aussies praising the confiscation of their property and rendering the place crime-free...ish.

This is more for the country that's headed towards a colossal fist-fuck because of politicians (criminals), pharmaceutical companies (insulated from mention by all major media and, not surprisingly, self-pimping turds without a clue like TYT, one of THE most flaccid, non-journalistic cretinfests on the web) who help to "create" mental-health problems larger than they need to be by unleashing damaged goods full of legal drugs prescribed by complicit doctors. Step in, the magic wand of unraveling and deconstruction of the U.S. Constitution by appointed and approved, so-called scholars from Harvard(oh hey, the same place not a few of the cunts who run the country hailed-from) to "provide" a solution for a problem that they created and you have the slow-motion train-wreck of the coming police state in one of the best places to be on the planet.

Everything is propaganda sparky, it's your job to wade through what you perceive to be bullshit, kinna like I'm wading thorough yours without really wanting to argue.

Brave New World. Newsflash: Eliminate gun-free zones, arm yourselves against an agenda to let mental health monstrosities roam the place un-checked on hardcore psychotropics with guns STOLEN from their fucked-up mommy, and don't ask a country who will hide their guns from a government determined to take them ALL away to accept anything less than a sane solution to what is primarily a problem created by the people with the MOST money, power, and influence.

Tell me why the pharmaceutical companies shouldn't be having their asses dragged across the coals on television for their part in mass-murder? Answer: Because they have more power and money than a gun lobby.

Again, I give fuck-all about loaded facts and figures form any side of the aisle, they mean dick because the real issue lies in governments fist-fucking their citizens. Shame on the the Brits for letting their government take their shit away and shame on the Aussies for letting the Crown fuck them as well.

the only way to explain this movie is with a before and after universe. where universe one story line takes place, and another where the other version of the story happens, we watched timeline B. where the people are sent back to and killed. it IS possible that the mom was killed by some other gangsters and the kid goes awol in timeline A, the movie would have taken place, and that by sending people back are in fact sending them to the alternate version of timeline a.

or

in theory, if you follow how quantum states work, if sending someone back in time, you are actually removing him from our existence and creating a world for that person to appear in separate from ours but still within it, or kinda imbetween us, but not visible to us, and that 2nd world would then only exist because of that person, making sense that what happens happens, but by killing himself, he no longer is able to exist in that new world, forcing the matter in the new world to "overwrite" the original where he was sent from.
kinda like how quantum matter does not decide what it wants to be until it is measured. that stops world 1 from making sense, erasing world 1 with the new world 2. this is most likely the only way to prevent the time loop issue caused by most "time travel" movies.
or, in star trek terms, world 1 is real, world 2 is not. unless something happens in world 2 that breaks world 1. making world 2 the most likely outcome for the future. erasing world 1 and world 2 becomes the world.

or even simpler, world 1 happens, then interferes, creating a 2nd image of itself, until something happens in world 2 that breaks world 1s existance, they both exist, and don't. until something happens to tell matter in those worlds what happens. so until that point where world 2 overwrites world 1. both exist and world 1 is still free to interefere with world 2. or how ever many versions there are. you send someone back, they are killed, and both worlds are able to agree with the outcome merging and continuing as if nothing happened.

if you follow... i think i got ahead of myself with this one. this is all of course a movie.

http://videosift.com/video/Spying-On-The-Home-Front-PBS-Frontline

http://videosift.com/video/Fight-for-Internet-Privacy



http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552225-38/senate-bill-rewrite-lets-feds-read-your-e-mail-without-warrants/

The day is long past that individuals have a say in who, what, when, why, and where intelligence communities can peruse their personal business-Welcome to the New World Order of fries and drink your milkshake!

....choggie warned you...choggie warned you ALLL!

>> ^Norsuelefantti:

So soon USA will become a cult nation? Can't wait.


Trips me out that it took someone besides the submitter and 2 days to add this to the cult channel. Mormonism is about as glaring an example of a cult as any of them. Others you may have heard of....
Scientology
Jehovah's Witnesses
Church Universal and Triumphant
Moonies
Raëlism
Christian Scientists
Unification Church...and a shitpot full of others including some fringe militant polygamists with their heads up to their red necks up each other's asses.
It's a brave new world, William Gibson fans get ready because he pretty much nailed with every novel possible scenarios for soon-to-be Planet E, and whack religions factor way in.
Personally, I'd love to have al...er, some of you, members of my church someday

Couldn't agree more

>> ^deathcow:

I imagine a cheetah in the wild could probably kick her butt speed-wise... you know... one which has to work for food.

You must have READ MY MIND . I wish i could promote a comment, but I can't so you'll have to settle for an ^upvote^
In reply to this comment by deathcow:
I imagine a cheetah in the wild could probably kick her butt speed-wise... you know... one which has to work for food.

Oh and yes, "vapid"...Facebook is nothing if not vapid....and apparent.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/investors-sold-stock-facebook-ipo-17049466#.UDS5bKNWIa4

Facebook phenomena has its roots in what sells to the masses.
Defend it against its detractors, oh user and supporter, and you may cloak some denial in the realization of its hold on you.
Support it, and you may indulge in a diversion which gives incredible power over your life to others, some anonymous, to many aspects and influences in your robotic existence.

Play well with others, and discover a brand new world of someone parked in a cubicle in Langley, Virginia knowing what brand of baby powder you like to use on Wednesdays for that special date....
THIIINK ABOUT IT!!??

The kitty apocalypse has began. His death will herald in the new world order. I have stockpiled Catnip in the hope I will be spared.

New ideas cost money, child, and are uncertain profit-makers. So shut up and passively swallow our regurgitated shit-vomit.

Sincerely, Hollywood.>> ^Sagemind:

Reboots are great - but movie-makers don't seem to realize that imagination still exists. New stories are being written everyday. I'm getting tired of the the reboot.
I want new stories, new worlds, new plots, new characters - Is that too much to ask?

Reboots are great - but movie-makers don't seem to realize that imagination still exists. New stories are being written everyday. I'm getting tired of the the reboot.

I want new stories, new worlds, new plots, new characters - Is that too much to ask?

November is coming... so hilarious.

Will you promise to leave the country when Obama is re-elected?

Also, your boy Rmoney built a a healthcare plan very similar to the one you're so enraged about. Wow, that must sting.>> ^quantumushroom:

Didja read my post before commenting, because health care is not really the issue here, serfdom is.
We have had a very similar scheme in australia for DECADES. If you dont get private health cover, the govt will tax you to a rate where you would otherwise be paying for it anyway, in order to provide public care to those too poor to even pay taxes to begin with.
So why does anyone there bother to buy private health insurance? Isn't socialied medicine just as good or better than for-profit health care?
This ensures EVERYONE IS COVERED EVERYWHERE, no matter the circumstances.
If you have ZERO insurance and you have to amputate a leg, or get coronary bipass surgery....ITS FREE!
We have that here too. Ever hear of Medicaid? What about the "free" care for the 12 million illegals here (more than HALF of Australia's ENTIRE population)
Our standard of care is FAR above yours, WE SPEND LESS GDP PER CAPITA than you for it too!
You're really going to compare an island of 22 million to the USA? You are FAR from utopia.
https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2007/187/9/challenges-heal
th-and-health-care-australia
Access to (Australian) health services is becoming less equitable. Patients’ out-of-pocket costs have grown 50% in the past decade and now, for some, present a sizeable barrier to needed care.
You don't get it because you're not an American. As an honorary member of the Euro system, you will always see government as the solution to everything, and that's fine for you, but that shit doesn't fly here. The settlers didn't flee England in search of a new world in order to have a gigantic leviathan government coddle us. Fucking Obama and King George III of England look a lot alike these days, maybe it's the crown.
Your assumptions are many and flawed. You assume taxocrats (the American left) want to "save" money. They couldn't care less, we've spent 9 trillion on a failed war on poverty. Liberals measure success by the weight of their good intentions, not results.
In other words, insanity.
If this was really about the 30 million uninsured, there's more than enough revenue just to cover them. But Nooooooo, EVERYONE is now a subject of the King, because this corrupt legal decision isn't about health insurance, it's about control. Tyranny. The end of freedom.
Fuck 'em. November is coming.

Didja read my post before commenting, because health care is not really the issue here, serfdom is.

We have had a very similar scheme in australia for DECADES. If you dont get private health cover, the govt will tax you to a rate where you would otherwise be paying for it anyway, in order to provide public care to those too poor to even pay taxes to begin with.

So why does anyone there bother to buy private health insurance? Isn't socialied medicine just as good or better than for-profit health care?

This ensures EVERYONE IS COVERED EVERYWHERE, no matter the circumstances.
If you have ZERO insurance and you have to amputate a leg, or get coronary bipass surgery....ITS FREE!

We have that here too. Ever hear of Medicaid? What about the "free" care for the 12 million illegals here (more than HALF of Australia's ENTIRE population)

Our standard of care is FAR above yours, WE SPEND LESS GDP PER CAPITA than you for it too!

You're really going to compare an island of 22 million to the USA? You are FAR from utopia.

https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2007/187/9/challenges-health-and-health-care-australia

Access to (Australian) health services is becoming less equitable. Patients’ out-of-pocket costs have grown 50% in the past decade and now, for some, present a sizeable barrier to needed care.

You don't get it because you're not an American. As an honorary member of the Euro system, you will always see government as the solution to everything, and that's fine for you, but that shit doesn't fly here. The settlers didn't flee England in search of a new world in order to have a gigantic leviathan government coddle us. Fucking Obama and King George III of England look a lot alike these days, maybe it's the crown.

Your assumptions are many and flawed. You assume taxocrats (the American left) want to "save" money. They couldn't care less, we've spent 9 trillion on a failed war on poverty. Liberals measure success by the weight of their good intentions, not results.

In other words, insanity.

If this was really about the 30 million uninsured, there's more than enough revenue just to cover them. But Nooooooo, EVERYONE is now a subject of the King, because this corrupt legal decision isn't about health insurance, it's about control. Tyranny. The end of freedom.

Fuck 'em. November is coming.

Well and of course we know #1 actually can be continued as for some reason there seemed to already be people there.

So in fact they probably found it first a LONG time ago up by Alaska's volcanic chain via the Russia/Alaska land-bridge that would have existed there for a time; plus someone would have to fill me in but I'm not entirely sure where the Polynesians "may" fit into all of this--as I know they were also known to be GREAT seamen and went very far on extremely small vessels (the ones I'm thinking of you actually have your legs in the water and it carries about six people and is designed sort of like an odd Catamaran)--Hawaii for example was settled into by 300-500 CE. Then the Vikings in Greenland, Canada, and North America (I think just Maine and a few points in Newfoundland--they also didn't stick around for long in these areas as they left these "western" camps to go back to Greenland for the winter). Finally, Columbus made it who sailed around The Caribbean a bit (basically Cuba then Haiti I think; if I remembered right--after coming from the Canary Islands).

There may even be more history to it as unfortunately we know how history is written AND if you don't have that much of a language and worse no paper or way to reference or keep track of old material, telling your story becomes VERY hard as it was never recorded in the first place. All we have left is archeology to help guide us to these newer, more exact figures and finders.

BUT, Columbus did find the first real trade route for 15th century Europe to a "New World", one that had its own spices and plenty of bounty, and THAT is what meant everything. THIS is what people should remember, not that he found it first or the round Earth garbage--that is just bad teachers and even worse (as I READ THEM) terrible history books!

>> ^messenger:

Wouldn't this have been easier if the lengths of the towropes had been staggered so they'd all have more room?


and without katy perry?

Brave New World