Sorry,

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/A-Dating-Video-Montage

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by mintbbb. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by mintbbb. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

sorry, but

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/A-Dating-Video-Montage

This is a deleted scene from the training montage in Rocky IV.

This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by mintbbb.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Ellens-Hilarious-Scare-Montage-10-15-2010

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Hybrid. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

I'm not a film maker but a cinephile, and from what I gather you have two of the exceptions correct. Another is when breaking the fourth wall or if a character is also a narrator (eg Rango).
In reply to this comment by TheFreak:
Sooooo...

I know there are some film makers on the sift. Somebody explain to me the rule on looking at the camera. I got the idea from somewhere that you were supposed to look off to the side of the camera rather than directly at it, in order to not freak the viewer out.

From this video it looks like there are two exceptions?

1. When the camera respresents the frame of reference of a character.
2. When you WANT to freak the viewer out.

Am I pretty close?

You really think that was all the explosions?
>> ^Reefie:

Well that was a nice montage of all the explosions from the movie
Seriously though, can't wait - have always enjoyed a good action-packed extravaganza!

Well that was a nice montage of all the explosions from the movie

Seriously though, can't wait - have always enjoyed a good action-packed extravaganza!

Don't know how I missed it!

>> ^Larson:

1:22
>> ^Deano:
No Ferris in there?

1:22
>> ^Deano:

No Ferris in there?

bound to happen.

interesting to me that I watched Kubrick montage concurrent with Gagnam Style yesterday.. coincidence?.