As an atheist myself, I agree with everything the guy says. However satisfying it may be for us to hear a guy sticking it to believers, I do not think it's very useful in the grand scheme of things. Most of these videos are just preaching to the choir (if you pardon the religious metaphor ).

Atheists enjoy these videos because it reinforces their positions with better eloquence than most could manage themselves, and believers are going to get riled up and call him infidel, godless or whatever religious put-down they prefer. Calling someone an idiot or unworthy of respect is not the way to make them adhere to your point of view.

If the goal of these videos is to de-convert religious people, or to make them 'see the light' (hehe), it can only fail.

Still, I like those videos, keep 'em coming.. but lets not delude ourselves about their intended audience and the social impact they intend to have.

wont matter in 3 more years.

your pondering is an exercise in pointlessness, infidel.

the poles are going to reverse in 2012, at which point, a vengeful mayan god will wake up from a long nap. All those not baptized with the power of the Melchisedech Preisthood, stripped from the earth after the crucifixion and failure of the surviving apostles, then restored to the earth by jesus and the angel moroni through the prophet Joseph Smith, shall perish.

All Mormons currently in orbit on this earthly plane will follow the zombie prophet, bringham young, to Missouri. Where the mayan god, known to those in the latter days as Jesus Christ, shall reign as king for 1000 years. Worker Ants of Zion will be busy. happily enslaved by their heavenly king, digging up the names of every soul that has ever been sent and moved on from physical existence, for the past 6000 years. tirelessly baptizing every dead mortal being in global history. preparing for the final battle between good and evil. assembling their tabernacle armies. so that Yahweh almighty can finally cast his judgement on humanity and every soul he thought to create can take their place in one of three levels of his merciful heaven.

then my parents will eventually get their own planet. and ill be a motherfucking princess.
bitches.

"It's only "slurring" if being a muslim is a bad thing."

It's slurring when you use it as a slur.

You mean like when you use Christian, Mormon, religious as a slur?

You're accusing him of being a Muslim, as though "Muslim" instantly means terrorist. It does not.

A muslim who is not warring against infidels is disobeying the quran. A muslim who is not deceiving infidels about his true nature is disobeying the quran. A muslim who is not working to create an islamic government in the country he inhabits is disobeying the quran. A muslim who refuses to beat his wife is disobeying the quran. A muslim who allows an image of mohammed to be produced is disobeying the quran...

There's a damned good reason very few Westerners flock to the islamic way of life and muslim-run countries in general. Can you guess what it is?

There are Islamic Fundamentalists, and there are Islamic Moderates, just like there are Christian Fundamentalists, and Christian Moderates.

Yeah, I've been meaning to ask where are these Islamic Moderates or more importantly, where is the tolerant, peace-enjoying, advanced civilization they've built? There must not be very many of them or perhaps CAIR and the Fundamentalists stole all the microphones...

You're apparently quite happy with allowing the Fundamentalists all the free reign they need to fuck up our country, as long as they Christian Fundamentalists.

Your arguments of Christian fundamentalists versus islamic fundamentalists is a dead end and you know it. At least in a majority Christian nation your overt bigotry against Christians won't end with your head being removed from your body.

That makes you a hypocrite.

A bigger hypocrite is Obama taking a pledge to "support and defend the Constitution".

I stand by my original statement: I wish this guy praised America like he does Islam.

I am sick to death of this slurring of Obama.

It's only "slurring" if being a muslim is a bad thing. The video is edited and yet even the unedited message is crystal clear: "I am not a muslim, but I revere the long history of muslims in America (there is no such thing) and celebrate islam's ideas and achievements...but remember I am not a muslim!"

Any sane person who has observed Obama's knowledge of and deference to muslims would assume he is sympathetic to muslims.

islam is incompatible with Western Civilization. The quran does a pretty thorough job of laying down the law as to who is an infidel and must be converted or killed. It also demands that governments be islamic governments or destroyed.

After a year of malfeasance, it's rather clear how little "racism" has to do with the disastrous course The One has set. Only Obama knows for sure if he's really a muslim. To me, he's close enough.

>> ^quantumushroom:
Why would Muslims serve in our military? A damned good question. A "faithful" Muslim must war against "infidels" aka anyone who is not a Muslim. This is not extremist blather, it's mainstream Islam and it's in the Quran.
Islam is incompatible with the West. You won't find any lefty-diversity phonies converting to the backwards religion anytime soon.


Just like there are many ways the Bible is interpreted which leads to moderate and extremist Christianity, there are also many ways people interpret the Quran, not all leading to extremist Islam.

Why would Muslims serve in our military? A damned good question. A "faithful" Muslim must war against "infidels" aka anyone who is not a Muslim. This is not extremist blather, it's mainstream Islam and it's in the Quran.

Islam is incompatible with the West. You won't find any lefty-diversity phonies converting to the backwards religion anytime soon.

no, thanks for catching it.

In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
Sorry oxdottir! 'tis a dupe.

http://www.videosift.com/video/WTF-Fox-News-Guest-Makes-Really-Odd-Face

Infidel - You were told to touch nothing but the lamp!
Put the Ruby down, slowly and carefully - and maybe with a little luck you haven't doomed us all...

Congrats..., now where is that diamond....

Tags for this video have been changed from 'dylan, infidels, license to kill, 80s, 1983' to 'dylan, infidels, license to kill, 80s, 1983, knopfler' - edited by silvercord

When I think of fun loving great places to visit or live.....well just read and see what I mean.......................(the Koran is not a simple history. It is the way all true Muslims must live.
What Islam Isn't
By Dr. Peter Hammond
FrontPageMagazine.com | Monday, April 21, 2008
The following is adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat:

Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.

Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called 'religious rights.'

When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to 'the reasonable' Muslim demands for their 'religious rights,' they also get the other components under the table. Here's how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

United States -- Muslim 1.0%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1%-2%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. ( United States ).

France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris --car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam - Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace -- there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 99.9%
(Where's your next vacation to?)

>> ^xxovercastxx:
Considering his first marriage ended in 1977 and he didn't remarry until 2009, and that he began hosting "this show" (The Late Show) in 1993, it's rather likely that no infidelity was involved, at least on Dave's part. Even Late Night debuted in 1982, so he'd already have been divorced.


He's been with Regine Lasko since 1988, so infidelity was involved.

>> ^Rotty:
I never watch david letterhead or the rest of your "late night" morons. And, I'm not surprised at the amount at the amount of support for infidelity here. Like half admitting your fuck ups is enough.


What's the fuck-up? That he had sex with an employee? Pfft, unless he directly abused his power and she had been the one complaining, that might have been the issue, but it really isn't here. You can argue that employer/employee relationships always are wrong, but are they really? If no one is taken advantage of then no one loses.

^http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM0g-7sZeSo

I think the quibble over the word "infidelity" is a bit beside the point. The public opinion is generally that infidelity means spousal infidelity, which this probably was not. (They were on a break!! )

>> ^garmachi:
I can't think of a classier way to handle that situation.
Also, why the eruption of applause at 7:55?


I think you had another video open, or a banner in another window, which had applause and it coincided with 7.55, cos i had no applause at that time mark.

And infidelity isn't completely inappropriate as a tag. Go look it up. It could be calling him an infidel, ie. religious infidelity. Or just performing a disloyal act. It doesn't require that you're married or committed to another person.

I really don't see any of the fuss:
NEWS FLASH - MAN HAS RELATIONSHIPS WITH WOMEN THAT HE KNOWS OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS.

Ok, it was at work, but if it was inappropriate, it's for the women to say so. Wouldn't be surprised if they say so now, because it's the perfect time to cash in - magazines and interviews and such. Such is the world we've created.

>> ^demon_ix:
>> ^Rotty:
I never watch david letterhead or the rest of your "late night" morons. And, I'm not surprised at the amount at the amount of support for infidelity here. Like half admitting your fuck ups is enough.

Because the entire Republican party renounced Senator John Ensign when he confessed to having an affair, right?


No, doucehbag, did anyome SAY that?

>> ^Asmo:
>> ^Psychologic:
>>
Doesn't infidelity generally require that the offending person be married at the time?

That's what I was thinking. As it stands it's just a (kinda ugly) guy getting his freak on with his employees.


I guess that depends on your standards of life. I really don't care about these hollywood pukes, but you people can justify whatever you want. How many weddings for your sister do you want to attend?